|
Kent Sharkey wrote: still clinging on to dated tech, like email
Clearly they should be using Snapchat instead.
|
|
|
|
|
u fail to understand .. the requirements are send by watsapp ... the specs are send by watsapp... the marketing done on instagram..the website is
on facebook..you can find the prices on instagram...dm me for delivery... the app is in the cloud... hell we dont have a office !!!..its all
cash on delivery !!!
Caveat Emptor.
"Progress doesn't come from early risers – progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." Lazarus Long
|
|
|
|
|
Except from secret closed door meetings at a well known technology company discussing some businesses refusal to unquestionably adopt new technology ...
This is why all customers need to be coerced to the cloud where they have little to no control over what they are required to use/accept. With the old model of ownership clients are able to opt out of future updates to our software. We at [redacted] have tried a number of solutions to coerce customers over to whatever new products we are promoting at the time but outdated concepts of ownership and choice have made this impossible so we are now moving customers to the cloud where they will have no choice about adoption. Yes the customer can always opt to stop using our services but unlike before they will have no older version to fall back on since the move to the cloud means the customer has no on premise option. In the old days if they did not want to upgrade from Windows 7 to 10 they could opt to keep running Windows 7 as long as the apps the use would keep working. The advent of the cloud and the services it has spawned like [redacted] are enabling us and our fellow cloud based brethren to remove customer choice while still making money. The cloud is truly a corporations greatest asset.
While the cloud allows us to control our customers software choices the unsecured IOT (Internet of things) will allow us unfettered access to every household on the planet and so our next biog goal is how best to coerce customers to accept unsecured IOT devices. Any ideas ......
End Excerpt
And some people wonder why there are those of us in the real world who don't embrace new technology without question or opt for the wait and see approach.
|
|
|
|
|
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
If you're so inclined, CBS is streaming their coverage of Apollo 11's 1969 mission to the moon right now, from soup to nuts. No, it's not in 4K
|
|
|
|
|
...nor even in 720p, never mind 1080p!
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
Back then, crayon on toilet roll was one of the better options.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
That's how they did some of their best design work too.
"They have a consciousness, they have a life, they have a soul! Damn you! Let the rabbits wear glasses! Save our brothers! Can I get an amen?"
|
|
|
|
|
All you need to do to wipe an object from footage is draw a box around it, and the software takes care of the rest for you. "Just as soon as I belong, then it's time I disappear"
|
|
|
|
|
For the 50th Anniversary of the Apollo 11 Moon Landing, take a tour of the code of the Apollo Guidance System. Just in case you need to maintain the code
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Just in case you need to maintain the code
Oh, sure, make fun of my life's work. But when I'm sitting happy on the moon and you're still stuck down here and staring up then we'll know who's the smart one! 
|
|
|
|
|
New ElectionGuard SDK to be open-sourced on GitHub; provided for free to voting machine vendors. It looks like you want a democracy. Do you want help with that?
Yeah... I'm going with 'no thanks' on this one.
|
|
|
|
|
If they secure the election results as good as their OS... 
well... what could go wrong? 
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
They seem to be demonstrating that they could secure it if they wanted to. Which in turn says that they don't really want to.
"They have a consciousness, they have a life, they have a soul! Damn you! Let the rabbits wear glasses! Save our brothers! Can I get an amen?"
|
|
|
|
|
It should open by presenting white text, describing what has to be done, on a blue background.
That will save a few memory registers, later.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
A former Microsoft software engineer was arrested on Tuesday and charged with mail fraud for allegedly attempting to steal $10m in digital currency from his former employer, US prosecutors said today. I wonder why he's an 'ex-employee'?
|
|
|
|
|
and he only used a test account... what would have happened if he had used the admin account?  
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
With skills like that, he should be re-hired as a security consultant.
«Where is the Life we have lost in living? Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge? Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?» T. S. Elliot
|
|
|
|
|
GitLab finds 68% of security professionals feel that less than half of developers can spot security vulnerabilities, but most people feel it's a programmer's job to write secure code. "Wicked, tricksy, false!"
(Because I've used the "When two tribes go to war" line way too many times)
|
|
|
|
|
ZDNet wrote: In short, Torvalds, and many other programmers see security experts as getting in the way of creating productive code.
That's a perversion of the explanation Torvalds give prior to that drivel of a "conclusion". Filling a security-hole is often a sign of a bug, and mitigating the hole isn't enough - one has to adress the bug. That doesn't mean that we prefer "creative" code, quite the contrary.
Also love how they shift the problem to the developer, repeating we are expected to be knowledgeable about security. Well, most of us are.
ZDNet wrote: Another problem is it seems many companies don't take security seriously enough.
What they're saying is that most companies don't want to put money into security, because it is seen as a cost that needs to be cut.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
How interesting. I find that 100% of security professionals that have never done SA or DevOps work are useless, overpaid fools.
"Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by stupidity."
- Hanlon's Razor
|
|
|
|
|
It won't last. Brothers and sisters are natural enemies! Like Security Specialists and Developers! Or Database Administrators and Developers! Or Program Managers and Developers! Or Developer sand other Developers! Damn Developers! They ruined Software Development!
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Python 3.8 is feature complete at this point, which makes it a good time to see what will be part of it when the final release is made. Two words: Walrus Operator
Oh, those crazy python kids...
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft to explore using Rust
Microsoft plans to explore using the Rust programming language as an alternative to C, C++, and others, as a way to improve the security posture of its and everyone else's apps.
|
|
|
|
|
They should.
It's in line with the decay in their quality.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
