|
A-wow, what a square, don't you dig the scene?
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
This is going to be possibly insensitive but was that author ALWAYS a she? If I get a hand slap about this so be it.
|
|
|
|
|
What would you do differently at work if you were the boss? I'm really surprised that's not 100%
|
|
|
|
|
Not me. Have had the same laptop for 6 years. If I get a faster machine, I "might" become more productive. Then my boss would expect that all the time. Keep the expectations low and use technology as the scapegoat. Win-win.
|
|
|
|
|
OK, that makes perfect sense. I sit corrected. 
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Let your workplace be upgraded. You might always blame the IT, they can slow you down even more than old technology. 
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
You are a fan of Wally, aren't you?
Oh sanctissimi Wilhelmus, Theodorus, et Fredericus!
|
|
|
|
|
Every week, I politely ask "Where the F**K is my helicopter?!?", but no-one ever has an acceptable answer.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
IBM X-Force Red, which is a team of veteran hackers at IBM Security with the primary aim of uncovering potential vulnerabilities in networks to help safeguard against them, announced today that it had discovered a potential weak point in network security that hackers can exploit to infiltrate the network and subsequently gain access to the devices and the data on it. Beware of IBM security "researchers" bearing gifts
|
|
|
|
|
Just the name "X-Force Red" tells you that they're a wunch of bankers who are pretty much giggling, drooling, and m@sturbating their way through their "discoveries".
A good kick in the bollocks for each of them. It's the only viable solution.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I just wonder... why the hell are those guys not used in the QA doing those discoveries before shipping the product
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
For decades, the dream of motorists all over the world has been a car that could run on frothy buckets of cheap, garbage fish like tilapia or something. Even more shocking
OK, not completely on topic for the news, but you never know when you might need this information.
|
|
|
|
|
Theoretically, a diesel-type engine can be produced that runs on ambient air -- we certainly have the technology for it.
I wonder why no-one has ever made an effort to prototype this.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: I wonder why no-one has ever made an effort to prototype this.
Because as far as there are people getting immensely rich with oil, the rest of the technologies will probably have to wait their turn
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Realizing the article is tongue-in-cheek, I do want to point out that the author completely ignored how much it would cost to keep 7200 eels alive and zapping. Far more than keeping the most gas-guzzling vehicle going, I suspect. - Or any other method to keep your electric car going.
Brent
|
|
|
|
|
I'm sure his next article will try putting a windmill on the roof. That way, the wind generated by driving will charge the car so you can drive farther. Perpetual motion! 
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Changes to configuration files don't change signature, can add malicious features. Shocking
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Shocking
Do you really think it?
I am kind of getting used to such news and it doesn't shock me so much.
Quote: Tsakalidis said that he had contacted Electron about the vulnerability but that he had gotten no response—and the vulnerability remains
Quote: A request from developers to be able to encrypt ASAR files was closed by the Electron team without action.
But this is still something I can't understand and makes me 
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: I am kind of getting used to such news and it doesn't shock me so much.
Sorry, that was meant to be a joke based on 'Electron'.
Failure is an option. 
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Aw c'mon now don't be so negative.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
With the release of .NET Core 3.0 Preview 7, C# 8.0 is considered "feature complete". That means that the biggest feature of them all, Nullable Reference Types, is also locked down behavior-wise for the .NET Core release. "Cause it don't mean nothing"
|
|
|
|
|
It’s something that shouldn’t be possible. Scientists have been left baffled by a star that appears to be older than the universe itself. It's probably just using a fake ID
|
|
|
|
|
This is one of those articles where you first think "oooh" and then read it and wonder that if this is the quality of logical reasoning of scientists, we're all doomed.
|
|
|
|
|
News.com.au edited: Pseudo-Scientists have been left baffled made ecstatic by a star that they can pretend appears to be older than the universe itself.
Fruggin' astronomers/astrologists!
Their bollocks kicks to needed are.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
No, it's just the science illiterate journalists who need that treatment.
The Plank satellite's data has produced the best estimate of the universe, tightly constraining it to 13.799 ± 0.021 (13.778 to 13.820) billion years.
We don't have the ability to constrain the properties of really old stars outside of clusters well enough to get tight estimates of their age,with the result that the best that can be done for HD-140283 is 14.46 ± 0.8 (13.66 to 15.26) billion years.
As anyone with a halfway decent science/math background would understand any number within the range is supported by the data; and that the overwhelmingly more plausible explanation is that the stars true age is almost certainly at the very low end of the range; and that more precise measurements of the stars parameters/better models of that type of stars evolution would almost certainly constrain its age farther downward as they have in the past. The current age estimate - from 2013 - lopped ~750m years off the previous upper end of the estimate range; which had gone all the way to 16bn years.
HD 140283 - Wikipedia
Strange 'Methuselah' Star Looks Older Than the Universe | Space
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
