|
Yep - but when I try to open the article from my articles list, the content source appears briefly, then all I see is the ad blocker message. I can't see anything else on the page which lets me load a previous or autosaved version.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Hang on - If I press the "source" button, it looks to be there.
Ah! Preview works - but I can't edit it in WYSIWYMGIYAL* mode.
Save that version, and edit it again, and ... I still can't see it.
I'll try closing the spellcheck-version-tab and see if that helps ... Nope.
I'll hit "Publish" and hope.
It worked!
* What You See Is What You Might Get If You Are Lucky
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
... except all my images are gone ... 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
OK - if I open it to edit on the Surface, it opens, and images are visible.
The preview shows the images as well.
Press Publish, and the images go through as well.
So it's all working - but can you disable the spell checker for the moment as I'm pretty sure it caused this, somehow ...
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Now this is getting weird.
I have the desktop and Surface side-by-side and viewing the same article: Adventures in 3D Printing Part 3: Making complex apertures - recovering from the Bends.[^]
On the Surface, it looks fine. All the changes - including some typo fixing I did on the Surface a few minutes ago - are there.
On the desktop ... the first image is there, but all the others are missing. The text - including typo fixes - is all there, but there aren't even placeholders for most of the images.
I can edit it on the Surface, but on the desktop I get "your ad blocker..."
Both are running Win10: 1903 (OS Build 18362.476) on the desktop, 1809 (OS Build 17736.864) on the Surface; Chrome Version 78.0.3904.108 (Official Build) (64-bit) on both.
Not sure why the surface is running older Windows, but ... I can't see it being that.
I confused. Anything you want me to try, let me know ...
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, I was able to recreate this issue.
I have uBlock on my Chrome with codeproject.com allowed and got the same error you did.
It seems that you also need to allow cdn2.developermedia.com. For some reason, when uBlock prevents the loading of a.min.js, our ad serving script, I breaks some other JavaScript. I'm not sure how this happens, but will investigate.
So you appear to have two options, disable uBlock while editing articles, or added an excpetion for developermedia.com.
I'm assuming that the Surface does not have an enabled adBlocker.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting ... both running uBlock with CP whitelisted.
No white- or black-list for developermedia.com on either ...
Added developermedia.com to whitelist, and the images are still missing.
Added cdn.developermedia.com to whitelist and they appear, but I still get the adblocker message when I edit it.
Investigating ... Oh fer Elephant's sake! Kasp-bloody-ersky has added a sodding ad blocker as well!
Disable that, and it all looks fine.
Sorry about that - Kaspersky obviously updated itself today and added a pile of crap, it just hasn['t got round to the Surface yet ...
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
i'm sure they mean well, but damn they can break things in the process.
Changing how you system works, in this case your browser, should require an explicit opt-in. If we hadn't investigated, you probably would have thought that Chrome or the OS were at fault.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
I was assuming cookies ... 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
OG in Q/A: Quote: You do take backups regularly, don't you?
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Don't tease OG. The man is in peril! 
|
|
|
|
|
Difficult to backup an article-in-progress, so I just save often. 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Ctrl&A Ctrl&C open a notepad Ctrl&V. Don't see how difficult that can be. I learned that while writing my only tip I published here 
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I have triple checked all my settings but am not getting emails
I registered a few months ago and definitely did not get one email.
|
|
|
|
|
You have not confirmed your email address. I've sent you a confirmation email. Please follow the instructions to confirm your address and you should start getting your newsletters.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks so much and woops 
|
|
|
|
|
Nothing from CP since 16:43 yesterday - it's curentlly 13:21 - and I've had a reply to a forum message from Codewitch 2 1/2 hours ago that should have generated one.
My settings are unchanged, and all say "messages on":
[edit]
I'm not the only one either: The Lounge[^]
[/edit]
[edit2]
I musta startled the Hamsters into movement: I'm getting them now for "new itmes", but not the older stuff I would have expected.
[/edit2]
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
modified 24-Nov-19 9:59am.
|
|
|
|
|
We had a service outage. Matthew applied the boot.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I have tagged Sean and Chris in my answer, but I think this message[^] needs consideration by the staff, that's why I am posting a "heads up" here
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
modified 22-Nov-19 1:58am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Do you think anyone will tell you how to defeat anti-bot features?
If you are a human looking at them, it should be do-able, but hard if not impossible for an automated system.
Telling you how to get recognised as a human bypasses that, and allows you to tweak your bot to pass the test. Anti-bot features are there to protect sites from automated systems, so bypassing them counts as malicious activity.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I would say definite spammer, from his QA answers.
|
|
|
|
|
I'd say he's planning on spamming, but he hasn't started yet - the two answers I can see are poor, but I can't see any links of URLs so there is no spam as yet.
On the "Watch List"!
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
