|
It seems that whatever you done helped me - no logout in the last 12 hours...
Thank you very much!
"The only place where Success comes before Work is in the dictionary." Vidal Sassoon, 1928 - 2012
|
|
|
|
|
When composing a message in the forums, the cancel buttons is triggering nothing.
I have to hit "back" or close the tab to abort the action of writing the message (or post blank and then delete it).
No matter if a new message (like an answer) or editing an old one
FF 73.0.1
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure if you will be interested on it, but there is a message adressed to @Chris-Maunder in the S&A forum.
@Sean-Ewington or @Matthew-Dennis I tag you just in case, to speak with Chris.
The post is: Question for Chris Maunder[^]
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Done, thanks
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
You are welcome
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
And it seems to be back with a vengeance. Almost every time I open QA now, I get a different set of random filters in the box.
I empty the box and click "update", and it seems to take. But then a few minutes later, it's set again.
No sign of the cookie you were looking for last time. The cookies I have are:
.codeproject.com:
- __gads
- __utma
- __utmz
- _gat_gtag_UA_1735123_1
- _ga
- _gid
- lpk
- mguid
- vk
www.codeproject.com:
- ai_user
- LoungeTab
- lpk
- mguid
- SessionGUID
The only obviously odd thing is the duplicated lpk and mguid cookies. The values appear to be the same, although they have different expiration dates.
Let me know if you need any more information.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
It's still there intermittently for me, but nowhere near "every time" - maybe one time in twenty, perhaps?
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks mate. This one continues to evade us and so maybe it's the case we simply turn it off for now, rip the code out and start from scratch. There's some mold in there somewhere that bleach just isn't fixing.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
self exploratory title.
Exception up = new Exception("Something is really wrong.");
throw up;
|
|
|
|
|
Chris is working on it. Being the magician that he is, I expect him to pull a hat out of the rabbit any time now. 
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
Mehdi Gholam wrote: self exploratory
Would you like some privacy?
Social Media - A platform that makes it easier for the crazies to find each other.
Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it.
Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
|
|
|
|
|
Making a small change in my profile and I couldn't save without having to supply my password.
OK - not outrageous - done by financial institutions, &etc.
Problem: the only place it seems I can enter it is in the 'change password' area. That was not my intention. Could this added security measure just pop-up a 'enter password', or even more clever, have a space for the password near 'SAVE' and disable SAVE until entered and matched?
| Ravings en masse^ |
|---|
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
It's annoying because you have to hover over a "change password" link to enter it. If password it required on all saves, then it needs to be part of the main form and not in a popup.
Also, having a popup for changing password is just bad design to begin with.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, the design is awful. There's no indication that you're being asked for your password. I had to come here and read this before I could work out how to change my email address.
- Pfft. Coddled kids. In my day, we used to telnet to port 80, then render the page with pencil and paper-- and that's the way we liked it!
- Pshaw! Youngster. Your UID barely fits inside 16 bits. In _my_ day we had to whistle the 1's and 0's through an acoustic coupler!
Tools that support "all of UTF-8 as long as it starts with ASCII" and tools that cannot handle these three [BOM] bytes at all are not really supporting UTF-8.
- Michael Kaplan
|
|
|
|
|
It's not designed to work like this. I'll get this sorted out.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I keep noticing people who, instead of adding missing info to the original question, post pages of code and stuff in comments or even as a solution.
I've wondered if they missed the green [Improve question] button because it's not always visible?
Then I wondered, why should it hide at all? Why is it not showing all the time? And that is my suggestion.
P.S.:
When I say button, another pet peeve of mine is stuff that behave like a button, but don't look like one! How should I know that some colored text in a corner is in fact an actionable element (i. e. a button)? How are new users supposed to know?
But that is a separate issue, on a much wider scope...
GOTOs are a bit like wire coat hangers: they tend to breed in the darkness, such that where there once were few, eventually there are many, and the program's architecture collapses beneath them. (Fran Poretto)
|
|
|
|
|
The idea was to keep the UI clean, but I agree and we're in the process of updating the UI.
Any suggestions you have, send them in! (even mockups if you're keen)
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
One random thought, which might not work:
If a user starts typing in the "solution" box on one of their own questions, show a big warning banner asking them whether they're actually trying to update their question, with a big "edit question" button.
Possibly with another confirmation message when they click submit.
It won't catch them all, but it might make it more obvious to new users who don't know how to update their question.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
I haven't been receiving notifications and newsletters from CP in a while. I suspect that this is due to our company changing the address naming scheme, and phasing out the old addresses.
I wanted to fix my email address in my profile settings, but that requires an email confirmation, and it appears that the confirmation mail is *not* sent to the new, but to the old, invalid email address!
How can I confirm the change of address when the old is invalid?? 
Problem solved: I had mistyped the new address 
GOTOs are a bit like wire coat hangers: they tend to breed in the darkness, such that where there once were few, eventually there are many, and the program's architecture collapses beneath them. (Fran Poretto)
modified 4-Mar-20 4:09am.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for letting us know
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
modified 4-Mar-20 10:29am.
|
|
|
|
|
I am opinionated, so I have been told by many...
I am not against technology, but...
what's with all these (obviously )- an opinion - see above -
LONG ABANDONED and UNANSWERED "quick answers" ?
( Obviously ) oxymoron title.
I am not against keeping archive, but are all these unanswered "quick" questions worth keeping ?
Make a managerial decision
if the "quick" question DOES NOT have accepted answer after period of time , ditch it!
|
|
|
|
|
The decision was made some time ago, and some of us are authorised to remove old questions. The problem is that there are thousands of them. It's a bit like painting the forth bridge (before long-life paint was invented).
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: if the "quick" question DOES NOT have accepted answer after period of time , ditch it!
I'd have to ask .. why?
-Is it really worth going to the effort of writing and testing the code to delete them?
- Not all questioners "Accept" a solution so straight away there are questions as to your thinking.
- Not all questions end up with a solution because a member may have answered the question in a comment instead - this is a very frequent occurrence. So don't delete "unanswered" questions with comments? What if the comment is "please update your question with the code / error message / more detail"
- how long is a "period of time"? One week, one month, one year? Does one size really fit all?
Don't forget, you can report a question as "Unclear or Incomplete", "Off Topic" etc. Just convince 2 other members to do the same and the question will automatically be deleted.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
