|
Just checked and I get a graph, but no list - just the blank page.
The graph comes up nice and quickly though!
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Same here, reputation graph comes in a flash but the list is always empty. Just the heading "Reputation History for Wendelius" and completely blank after that.
EDIT: Actually later the same day the reputation list page worked just fine. Could it be a workload issue in the mornings (GMT-2)...
modified 14-Jul-20 3:39am.
|
|
|
|
|
Just tried again (twice) and the list appeared, and very quickly indeed.
|
|
|
|
|
For me worked. 13 pages as usually and a bit faster I would say.
EDIT: But the graphic is still not matching. It is working, but not giving the correct values.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
It works better and better at least for me. Not every time, but at the moment it works more and more positive than in the past (at least better than my English  )
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
0x01AA wrote: at least better than my English
Believe me, your English is fine.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: Believe me, you english is your Google translations are fine.
FTFY  
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
At least when I check my words with google translate I would never write something like "you english is" 
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Don't worry about it. Plenty of native English speakers don't know the difference between "your" and "you're", "its" and "it's", or think that "should of" is correct usage.
|
|
|
|
|
that was me hitting one "delete" too much "writing the joke"
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I am trying to update this article: Beginners Quick Start to Learn React.js
Preview, worked fine. When I pressed publish, I got 503 error. Went back and tried, I get "Unable to make article available." as a text at the top of edit article page.
Can someone please look into it?
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
We've been having issues with our Redis client. I've restarted it and you should be good to go now.
I'm going to tackle this issue on Monday when I get back from vacation.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
Sure, thank you! I will retry.
UPDATE: It looks okay now and worked.
modified 11-Jul-20 12:37pm.
|
|
|
|
|
good on you Matthew - hope you have fun on the last couple of days vacation
let us know what if anything we can do to help
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
modified 13-Jul-20 14:26pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Damn Redis client is acting up again. I've got it working again, at least for a while.
I think I'm going to be busy next week when I get back from vacation.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
Same as Bruno reported 5 threads down #1.
Multiple WEB0*
Very occasionally ^F5 gets it.
Probably nothing you don't already know....
Cheers,
Peter
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Our redis server again had problems so Matthew finally lost his patience, blew the database away and is letting it rebuild. During the downtime there may have been missing data but that should be all good now.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
It sounds like Redis is making Matthew want to pull his hair out.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, this is his now because I no longer have hair to pull out
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
So while I'm editing a page online, I go to zip up a file and replace my current deliverable with an updated version. It takes a little longer than expected - about 5 minutes because life intervened.
Anyway, *while* I'm still editing someone tried to download the file and the system couldn't find it.
So what it looks like at least, is at the time I had edited, between when I deleted the file and when I replaced it with a new one, the user could not get to the old file.
To bottom line it, from my observations (and correct me if i'm wrong)
Behavior: Deleting a file removes it from the available downloads immediately.
Expected behavior: Deleting an attached file does nothing to the public article until "Publish" is clicked.
I understand if there are some technical limitations to this, but maybe a little notice above the files section at the very least would be helpful.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
We should clarify the UI.
When you upload a new version of a file while editing, the old version is still there and available. It needs to be for exactly the reason you described. You then submit your update and it goes to moderation. The old files are still there, but the new version will use the new versions of the files you uploaded. once your article is approved your new files then overwrite the old files and your new content overwrites the old content and the users see the new content and new files.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Then I don't know what happened here: CPPkg: Create Zips of Your Source Code From Visual Studio[^] (see Roger500's comments) he was trying to download while I edited and the system couldn't find the file. When I was done editing we both downloaded again no problem (i did it as a test)
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
Because you deleted the existing file Roger couldn't download it.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
