|
This at UTC 17:23
And yes of course I closed/started the browser (chrome Version 88.0.4324.150 (Offizieller Build) (64-Bit)) several times during the day.
I hope it helps and again: all this is not a problem for me. But I'm ready to help if it helps you.
modified 27-Mar-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Hit "Save Draft" on article then after much work, submitted it, but got some weird cache error in Chrome. No back button prompt or anything at all.
When the back button was hit, the page reverted to a version hours ago, even though Save Draft was done regularly since.
Anyway of retrieving the lost work?
Also, when opening a new page of the draft, Chrome cache gets an old copy of it- any way to keep it updated?
Thanks
Seg-asparating Coding 
modified 29-Jan-21 10:17am.
|
|
|
|
|
If you look at your revision history and check the box "Show auto-saved drafts" you can see all Saved Drafts.
- CodeProject[^]
I've gone back through some of them looking for one with more text, but I'm not sure which is the best version.
Is this one good?
ScrollCall[^]
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Sean, thanks for the info.
Fantastic- they are all there! The one desired is this - or perhaps the one after.
ScrollCall
Fantastic! Will keep the current and just copy the missing text in to it tomorrow.
Laurie
Seg-asparating Coding 
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you Sean,
you just confirmed what I told @Chris-Maunder or @Matthew-Dennis in the bug below... the drafts are listed in the revisions history too.
so there is something else going on with those reported articles.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I get the “failed to upload” message trying to upload any ZIP file for the already published article. It happened in both cases: if the file has the same name as the older one, or if I used a new name (containing version number).
Article page
Thank you.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
Would you mind emailing me the file and I'll give it a try? (sean@codeproject.com)
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Just tried. Got blocked:
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
sean@codeproject.com
host aspmx.l.google.com [108.177.120.27]
SMTP error from remote mail server after end of data:
552-5.7.0 This message was blocked because its content presents a potential
552-5.7.0 security issue. Please visit
552-5.7.0 https://support.google.com/mail/?p=BlockedMessage to review our
552 5.7.0 message content and attachment content guidelines. m9si5385333jas.48 - gsmtp
No problem. You can get the file here:
Here
Thank you.
—SA
Sergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
I also just encountered this error when editing an existing article and trying to replace its .zip download. This[^] is the article in question. Not only did the download fail to upload, it destroyed the download in the published version! This is a serious bug.
modified 29-Jan-21 13:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
It seems that our bug creation process has affected your ability to upload zips.
I'm attacking it now.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you very much, Matthew.
Could you notify me when I'm able to upload again?
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
You should be able to upload files now.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
That's right, all set now.
Thank you, Matthew!
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
I think messages deleted for spam should be deleted, unless they have answers. 
This is not at all different from having the same number of gibberish posts, it's still a denial of service.
GCS d--(d+) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
would it be possible to allow "multiple selection" for Protectors?
That way we could delete all at once (at least in the visible page), instead of needing to move mouse to each of them, click, move to "delete" in the confirmation, move to the next message and so on...
I can understand "security first" but in such cases it is really tedious to clean up a forum.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Don't quite understand why this article show as approved (by Editor or trusted author ). All it has is three spam reports...
- CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Left side below the tags and the stats is still "pending"
I think it is part of the same bug as here[^]
If you look at the images I posted later in the thread all the Vx are "approved by editor or trusted user" label
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 27-Jan-21 16:03pm.
|
|
|
|
|
All gone
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: All gone
gone, but not fixed I guess?
(no complain, just curiosity)
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I can still see it, and it is marked as closed. I would have expected it to be deleted as are most articles that get flagged as spam.
|
|
|
|
|
... without confirming my mail I can report members and earn points....
see here: SAOTD[^]
And it makes it possible this way, that my messages are not longer need to await moderation
modified 26-Jan-21 15:35pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Even more strange... your messages are chronologically inverted in this forum  
Message below:
Date: Tuesday, January 26, 2021 9:37pm
This Message I am answering:
Date: Tuesday, January 26, 2021 9:30pm
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can you please send me an email (sean@codeproject.com) and I'll get this sorted for you.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
