|
Posted that in the lounge:
Displayed 'in moderation'
Deleted by myself even I have no possibility to delete it by UI
modified 1-Apr-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't understand "Quote: Deleted by myself even I have no possibility to delete it by UI
How did you delete it if you didn't use the UI?
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think it is a good idea to post it here how I did that? But if you wish I can do it.
And please don't count me again as abusive/spammer it is my intention to help.
modified 1-Apr-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Use the EMail link at the bottom of my message.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
Done. I hope you recieved it.
modified 1-Apr-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Got it.
Thanks.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
You are welcome. Again I think delete is not a big issue, but I can imagine there are more possibilities by that way to abuse cp. I will try more and keep you informed. The bad boy 
modified 1-Apr-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
This message[^] is complaining about not working https://workspaces.codeproject.com/... link in the article where he posted.
I didn't know there was that "workspaces"sub in CP.
Not sure if it is just an old link that needs to be updated to something new or a problem of the site. That's why I decided to post it here. If this is something not to be considered "B&S" content, please feel free to move the thread somewhere else (Article Forum perhaps?) or tell me the correct place and I will move it myself.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Workspaces was a service we attempted to launch several years ago, but it didn't take off and was shut down.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
Then it is an issue with an author that didn't update the article to remove a dead link...
Thanks for the information
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
This is the option for a forum on a member profile page. When it is checked, it makes the forum read-only even for the owner.
Thank you.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
You seem to have a knack for finding the obscure bugs.
Thanks, I'll look into it.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
No plan survives contact with the enemy. 
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
This article was listed in one of the daily news emails:
Why Software Cannot Just Evolve — a Demonstration | Mind Matters
The problem is that mindmatters.ai is a biased right-wing backed website. The article itself is biased, tainted by the author's right-wing intelligent design creationist leanings. I didn't sign up for news emails from codeproject.com to have such drivel appear in my inbox, so I unsubscribed. If in the future codeproject.com commits to vetting news sources for quality, scientific integrity, etc., I may re-subscribe.
|
|
|
|
|
Duly noted.
Our editors grab news from everywhere without political considerations. However, we get it. Some sites we'll simply put on a list and move on.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Should you really be censoring a site because one person does not like it? I have read the article in question and see nothing contentious or biased in the content.
|
|
|
|
|
My reply was meant to indicate that: yes we hear your complaint, but we don't specifically target or block sites based on politics. There are, however, some sites we just avoid.
Basically we try to be careful and also considerate, and we'll continue to do so
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, that makes it clear.
|
|
|
|
|
If you want an echo chamber or safe space, go elsewhere.
|
|
|
|
|
Previously, I complained that a brand new article was not exposed properly on the page "Latest Articles", https://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/Latest.aspx.
Now, the problem is just the opposite  .
The article not marked as updated appears on the page "Latest Articles".
I intentionally did not check "Mark as updated" on the submission of my old article update, just because this is a major new release I'm trying to publish. I cannot leave the article as is, to avoid confusing the readers, and the problem is serious enough: VSCode extension API broke backward compatibility again and rendered the old version of my product defunct, so I fixed the software and mentioned it in the article. At the same time, I planned to mark the article as updated only after thorough testing and a complete review of the documentation and the article content. The article is:
https://www.codeproject.com/Articles/1194125/Article-Writing-Toolchain-with-VSCode.
By the way, this is the software I use to generate my articles for CodeProject in one click and a single paste operation in the article submission wizard, already automatically formatted to Code Project standards (and even stricter).
In the past, submission of the article update without "Mark as updated" performed successful update without having the article enlisted in "Latest Articles".
Can it be fixed?
Any advice for now?
Thank you.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
I'll be taking a look at this one.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you, Matthew.
I like the aphorism that goes below your messages about flies, a well-known one, one of my favorite.
However, a while ago I started to publish my own ones, and the most recent one (about the ridiculous, in the blog on my profile page) was inspired by this very article and some related ideas.
Thank you.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
If you made significant changes to the article, it may have been added to "Latest Articles" solely on that basis.
|
|
|
|
|
Really? Hmm... How do you know? This is not exactly what I observed. I think my article was added to the "Latest Articles" list after the first update in 2021, while earlier updates have been done in 2017. Then I've done several updates between February 27 to March 1, but in "Latest Articles" it still stays on February 27, even though later updates were somewhat more massive.
Any ideas?
Thank you.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, no other ideas. It was just my impression based on updating my own articles. Sometimes a revision would appear on the site's main page, even though I wasn't checking the "Mark this article as updated?" box.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
