|
I saw 3 ... then 5 ... then 7. No glasses. I think if you don't "need" to wear glasses all the time, you shouldn't. Muscle exercise (my theory). I'm old.
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
|
|
|
|
|
4 at first sight. Then gradually all the seven digits. The last one (9) was very difficult, though.
"In testa che avete, Signor di Ceprano?"
-- Rigoletto
|
|
|
|
|
I first saw 1528. Viewing on a Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 tablet. But that was sitting in my brightly sunlit solarium without my glasses.
Moving to the office out of the sun and I see 15283. Add my glasses and I still see 15283. Since I'm in my office I look at it on my desktop. Acer 22" 1920x1080 monitor with glasses I see 45283 and can see faint values on either side but can't make them out at all.
On my Pixel 6 Pro I can see all 7 numbers but the outer two are so faint that I'm not sure if I am actually making them out myself (I think I am) or if my brain is supplying the missing info knowing what others have seen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I see 5283 as soon as my eyes adjust to the weird image. The 34 on the left and 9 on the right I can barely make out exist, then I can see them clearer once my eyes adjust again after noticing them. I wonder if that means I have good vision contrast or bad 
|
|
|
|
|
3452839 much easier to see in the negative
Mircea
|
|
|
|
|
That's cheating. And very clever! 
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP.
|
|
|
|
|
8675309
It’s hard to see but once you have it you don’t want to change it.
It would be easier if they used more than just black and white because the two tone picture is hard to see on the wall!
If you can't laugh at yourself - ask me and I will do it for you.
|
|
|
|
|
OK, I got it!
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
"Hope is contagious"
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2022/02/18/10/54355617-10526875-image-a-1_1645179459119.jpg[^]
Isn't this why I have Lloyds of London to thank for covering my rear when I insert links?
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, the longer I look at the image, the number I feel! I have become comfortably dumb numb! 
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
"Hope is contagious"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ha.. that's why I keep losing at OW hey?
I took me half a second to see a 2 and a double take and concentration to see 4 more numbers, barely...
|
|
|
|
|
One of my customers has drunk the Microsoft Koolaid and gone to Office365. What a steaming pile of elephants.
So with distributed development these days and with the manta of Microsoft products, we have to use Teams for chats and what not.
I need to capture a chat session. All I want to do is save the entire chat session. It's not supported in any reasonable fashion. If you go out to their support sites, you are told you can cut/paste (for a 6 month chat?) or screen capture (seriously?). People have been screaming for this for over 2 years.
Maybe someone on CP knows how to do this? Right now, I've learned that I'm supposed to be able to go out to the export section if it's enabled... no joy yet.
Charlie Gilley
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
Has never been more appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
I hear your pain and have never figured that out either. I don't believe it's possible.
|
|
|
|
|
Your MS Teams Admins can do this not end users. Microsoft has mentioned in many community forums/threads that they have no intention of making an "export" feature available to the end user.
I feel it is my duty to remind all Teams users, especially those in corporate settings, that EVERYTHING you do in Teams is recorded on the servers and can be used against you in every imaginable way...even if you delete the message, it has already been recorded as soon as you sent it.
|
|
|
|
|
It monitors your activity (key strokes and mouse movements) as well.
|
|
|
|
|
that's just gross. I suspect that not many people realize that...
Charlie Gilley
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
Has never been more appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
I know the admins can do that, but frankly, it's stupid. It makes the chat process useless. Begs the question why they still let us use a local .PST file for mail.
Just a shade under automatically rebooting your machine.
scumbags
Charlie Gilley
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
Has never been more appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
Our CIO hates it, prefers Zoom. Everyone else in IT prefers Teams. I rarely have a need to export a chat session, so I don't miss that feature. However, they could vastly improve the search function.
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP.
|
|
|
|
|
Searching for Teams in MS's Graph Explorer shows two entries, "Microsoft Teams" and "Microsoft Teams (beta)" (you may have to login first). I don't see anything promising under the first entry, but under beta, there's items such as "Get messages in a channel", "Get messages in a channel" and "Get replies to a message in channel".
If it's functional at all, it looks like it's possible...but you'll have to build it yourself. This is as far as I've taken it. I haven't looked into how to get the IDs it needs as params.
[Edit]
There's a "Get list members of a chat", which tells you it needs a chat ID, and also shows a link to get a list of chat IDs ("Get https://graph.microsoft.com/beta/me/chats/"). Running that seems to have returned a list of chats I've had with other people. Using date/time stamps, you should be able to find the chat ID you're looking for, and from there, I would imagine, find another API that takes in the chat ID.
Good luck...the fact that you can get the data piecemeal as JSON strings sounds intriguing to me. You may have a differing opinion. 
|
|
|
|
|
record the session in a video?
You can't copy+paste parts of it, but you can at least re-read it offline, or use screenshots to make a pdf of it or try to OCR them
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I saw one group session turn on something called a transcript mode.
I'm sure there are a zillion ways of working around something this stupid, but most of us just use some other tool.
Charlie Gilley
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
Has never been more appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
I really miss the old lync/Skype feature that would archive all chat logs into a folder in your email called “Conversation History”. That folder followed normal email retention policy. This would let you forward it to someone else.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
