|
|
Reminds me of when the company decided to switch to team approach to everything. Out manager called me to his offce to tell me he wanted me to be a team leader. I told him we didn't have any real teams. He asked what I meant?
I told him that real teams have cheerleaders, so could I interview cheerleaders and design their unifoms?
H decided that I was unsuitable as a team leader, whch was my whole point.
CQ de W5ALT
Walt Fair, Jr.PhD P. E.
Comport Computing
Specializing in Technical Engineering Software
|
|
|
|
|
Dr.Walt Fair, PE wrote: team approach
I just had another one of these episodes today. After an hour on a remote, the teammate got their problem solved and I got further behind! 
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
"Hope is contagious"
|
|
|
|
|
My back, neck and eyes (I have to use 125% magnification) really favor doing things from my own desk rather than crowding aroung the single monitor of a coworker.
Add the fact that I can cross-reference with my code an my documentation when asked a question, trather than going back to my desk, seraching and returning (or yelling from one side of the office to the other)... yeah I do prefer teams meetings unless we are brainstorming or just aligning.
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
The shortest horror story: On Error Resume Next
|
|
|
|
|
Waxing cynical... it's pretty dang smart if you ask me.
The corpora-spyware definitely looks at teams activity for MSFT to sell your employer a metric on how hard you work (or don't).
|
|
|
|
|
Can you please suggest me a free VS tool which generates code documentation like that:
private int CalcBid(HandCards hand, int player)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seems the community edition is free all others paid.
"Ten men in the country could buy the world and ten million can’t buy enough to eat." Will Rogers
PartsBin an Electronics Part Organizer - Release Version 1.3.1 JaxCoder.com
Latest Article: EventAggregator
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you.
Looks good but does not catch my return value?
public List<PlayingCard> GetHandTrumpCards(int TrumpCardID)
{
var lopc = new List<PlayingCard>();
foreach (PlayingCard card in Cards)
{
if ((int)card.CardType == TrumpCardID | (int)card.CardValue == 2 | (int)card.CardValue == 3)
{
lopc.Add(card);
}
}
return lopc;
}
|
|
|
|
|
Check what config options it has.
|
|
|
|
|
Probably not an options thing.
It just does not fill the return section.
The GhostDoc Comment editor shows:
Quote:
public List<playingcard> GetHandTrumpCards(
int TrumpCardID
)
Parameters
TrumpCardIDType: Int32
The trump card identifier.
Return Value
|
|
|
|
|
The return value is not uniquely named. A method may have several return statements, and the values may be expressions, possibly different expression for each of several returns.
The tool could of course create a list of all return statements. The same that you can obtain by a string search. I am not sure how useful that would be.
Religious freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make five.
|
|
|
|
|
Do you say it works only for
return value;
|
|
|
|
|
I never used this tool, but OP presents an example where it doesn't catch his 'return lopc;', leaving only
in the 'documentation'.
I am one of those who likes to get out of here as soon as the job is done; I detest the 'single exit point' style that could increase the block nesting level by half a dozen or more. In other words: Some methods can have half a dozen or more return statements.
You might want to have them all listed above the method prototype; I think it messes it up. With several exits, the reason for leading to that exit is frequently far more essential than the exit value - especially if it is in the class of 'success' or 'failure'! Seeing four 'return failure' and two 'return success' in the documentation is not really informative. Seeing 'return lopc' makes very little sense until you have studied the actual code, seeing how lopc is built, but then you hardly need the documentation telling that lopc is returned!
If you use the template for filling in a brief explanation of what it takes to succeed, or in this case, what is the semantics of the subset of cards returned: Fine. I assume it applies to all the return statements, if there are several.
Also, those insisting on 'single exit point' must refrain from coding any exception that might propagate out of the method. That would be an exit not through that 'single exit point', so trusting that you can catch everything immediately before your single 'return' is fooling yourself.
Religious freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make five.
|
|
|
|
|
|
No I did not, because I was not aware of it.
Thank will try it.
|
|
|
|
|
this processes existing comments.
it does not create the comments themselves.
CI/CD = Continuous Impediment/Continuous Despair
|
|
|
|
|
Of course it does, it needs the comments to convert them to document format. Which is what the OP asked for in his question.
|
|
|
|
|
This is not code documentation, these are just unnecessary comments  
|
|
|
|
|
Extremely necessary if you want your SPICE or ASPICE certification.
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
The shortest horror story: On Error Resume Next
|
|
|
|
|
If those comments/methods are in a class library those comments could be very helpful to folks using that library.
There are no solutions, only trade-offs. - Thomas Sowell
A day can really slip by when you're deliberately avoiding what you're supposed to do.
- Calvin (Bill Watterson, Calvin & Hobbes)
|
|
|
|
|
The autogenerated comments will just tell you what you already see from the name and types. Documentation is for the things you can't see directly.
Personally my preferce is not having the autogenerated comment, then you do not need to waste time finding out if it tells you anything or not.
|
|
|
|
|
I took this to be a framework for filling in you more descriptive comments, such as <param name="hand" />Set of cards currently held by 'bidder'
(I can imagine even more helpful explanations that this, especially if I knew more of the context.)
Without any explanation, just formatting the method prototype in a different layout, is meaningless.
Religious freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make five.
|
|
|
|
|
The crusade against comments wields a rusty pin and calls it a sword.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
