|
Halp! (not really)
I have a very similar problem.
I have two separate processors in one die. They can share memory. The memory isn't all in one flat region, but rather, it is partitioned out into memory with different properties, like tightly coupled memory geared for instructions or geared for data (ARM is modified harvard architecture)
It's like this
Region Start address End address Size Free Used Usage (%)
BOARD_FLASH 0x30000000 0x31000000 16777216 16446388 330828 1.97%
SRAM_DTC_cm7 0x20000000 0x20040000 262144 253132 9012 3.44%
SRAM_ITC_cm7 0x0 0x40000 262144 262096 48 0.02%
SRAM_OC1 0x20240000 0x202c0000 524288 276328 247960 47.29%
SRAM_OC2 0x202c0000 0x20340000 524288 524288 0 0.00%
SRAM_OC_ECC1 0x20340000 0x20350000 65536 65536 0 0.00%
SRAM_OC_ECC2 0x20350000 0x20360000 65536 65536 0 0.00%
BOARD_SDRAM 0x80000000 0x83000000 50331648 50331648 0 0.00%
NCACHE_REGION 0x83000000 0x84000000 16777216 16777216 0 0.00%
The trick is there are two sets of these, one for each core, and the program code, heap, and stack cannot interfere with memory from the other core. Other than that it is possible to share memory and I plan to in order to enable communication between cores.
So it's a lot like laying out partition tables, but interleaving two sets of tables together with certain overlapping and non-overlapping sections. Also certain sections have to be at certain locations in order to facilitate the ROM actually running the code.
For a certain type of mind this is easy. For me, not so much.
I don't actually need help. I'll figure it out, but maybe some of you have felt similar pain.
Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
|
|
|
|
|
All the time. GParted live USB stick saves the day every time.
>64
It’s weird being the same age as old people. Live every day like it is your last; one day, it will be.
|
|
|
|
|
I wish I had a snappy tool like that. All I've got is NXP's Eclipse based MCUxpresso IDE, and its tables are little better than a CSV editor. In fact, that's pretty much what it is.
I was thinking about making some kind of calculator in C# but the effort probably won't pay for itself for quite some time.
Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: I was thinking about making some kind of calculator in C#
Seems like you could create something 'good enough' using [insert spreadsheet app of choice here; default = Excel].
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
True. That wasn't even on my radar. 
Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
|
|
|
|
|
This comment was based on hard-won experience.
Once upon a time I spent a couple days writing an app to compute some values and the math wouldn't come out the way I thought it should. I fired up Excel to test the calculations and in less than an hour I had verified them plus calculated the values I needed  .
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Researchers demonstrate 3D nanoscale optical disk memory with petabit capacity[^]
Yes, you heard that right: petabit - 100+ terabyte CDs. High density, low power, long life.
And this is a prototype - so expect production to be closer to petabyte if it ever gets there. 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
This is a remarkable achievement, but the big issues here are access speed, reliability, retention period, and cost. For example, we already know how to encode data in much higher densities as DNA bases (2bits/base), but the access speed and cost make this impractical as a data storage method.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
I'd rather petacat.
I'd lose my files in something so vast.
Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
|
|
|
|
|
You can pet mine if you want - just don't rub his tummy. 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
You sound like you're saying 640 terabytes is enough for anyone. 
|
|
|
|
|
heh.
maybe one day it won't be. But right now, to fill that would mean a sea of files I'd never be able to navigate in one lifetime.
Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
|
|
|
|
|
A few decades ago one of my old friends was evaluating a new storage technology for all the x-ray images and a couple dozen other digital high-resolution image formats. Essentially it consisted of the 'foil' of CD-ROMs, but on a flexible substrate, cut to tape half an inch wide, and wound up on a reel, 3600 feet per reel.
The capacity was enormous - this university hospital, among the bigger ones in Norway, estimated that they could store all their images on a single tape reel a year - maybe two, if the future brought other kinds of imaging equipment. They estimated that all of Western Europe might need maybe a hundred reels a year. Maybe a few hundred reels.
This is the reason why they rejected the technology: The capacity was too high. No manufacturer will keep up a production of a few hundred rolls of tape a year - maybe a thousand, for the entire world. A million? Probably not. Ten million? Maybe. But a few hundred: No, absolutely no.
They were right: The technology never made it past the demo stage.
Religious freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make five.
|
|
|
|
|
It's estimated that ignoring physical data (books, papers, ...) we as a planet currently store over 60 zettabytes (1 billion terabytes), and that 90% of that data was created in the last two years. And apparently, the volume of data in the world doubles in size every two years.
Back in 2008, Google alone was processing 20 petabytes a day. Throw in Farcebok, tiktok, twatter, and the cloud and gawd know how much is processed today.
The important thing to remember is that data expands to fill available space (plus 10%)
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: data expands to fill available space (plus 10%)
Dark Data! The next bleeding edge field of study!
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
jeron1 wrote: Dark Data
Latest theory: Dark Matter is made of the diskettes spewed all over the Universe by AOL Intergalactic.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
>64
It’s weird being the same age as old people. Live every day like it is your last; one day, it will be.
|
|
|
|
|
And if we distill the data to valuable information, we probably require less than 1 petabyte of storage per annum. The rest is Tik-Tik videos, Cat videos, repetitive films (all with the same theme), junk data, and assorted babble.
What a waste of hardware. 
(OTOH, selling the hardware enables my employer, Western Digital, to keep me employed, so it's not all loss...)
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
How dare you tell me that videos and photos of Mr. Whiskers are not important
Hogan
|
|
|
|
|
So much of it could be logical links to centralized CDNs, too.
Zillions of duplicates.
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Pfeffer wrote: What a waste of hardware.
I must admit that I contribute to that myself.
Just like I like to go to my bookshelf just looking at their backs, reading their titles and recalling the story (sometimes I pick the book from the shelf to re-read a chapter or passage) - I used to go to the library find good books but hated returning them - in a similar way, it gives me a good feeling to know that my favorite movies are available in my shelves. All my favorite music as well. Just seeing a CD cover can lighten my mood.
No streaming service bankruptcy can take away my access to books, music or movies. No censorship, no economic decision cleaning out the space to make room for more profitable pieces. And: It is nobody's business which books I read, at which times and how many times I re-read which parts of the book. Or watch a movie. Or listen to a piece of music.
I've got several terabytes of electronic information, several terabytes of printed information, practically all of it redundant. It could have been retrieved from elsewhere. But I want to have it available, here at my fingertips.
Religious freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make five.
|
|
|
|
|
trønderen wrote: I've got several terabytes of electronic information, several terabytes of printed information,
Presumably you mean that printed material is stored electronically rather than physically.
Following estimates that a terabyte would hold 1 million books. Probably not realistic to idly scan that number.
How many e-books can you put on a 1 TB hard drive? - Quora[^]
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Throw in Farcebok, tiktok, twatter, and the cloud and gawd know how much is processed today
And the GDP of the US in 2022 was $25 trillion.
But much of that is not kept in bank accounts. And certainly not one bank account.
|
|
|
|
|
Does very dense memory hardware have a greater risk of radiation damage?
Inquiring mind.
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
|
|
|
|
|
If you have a CD/DVD damaged by ionizing radiation, you have much bigger problems than data loss...
Electronic storage (RAM), magnetic media (HDDs) or electron traps (SSDs) can definitely be affected by radiation, changing single bits in the memory. When dealing with physical pits (as in manufactured CD-ROMs/DVDs etc.) or chemical changes (as in CD-R/DVD-R etc.) on a larger scale - it's less likely.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
