|
Excellent.  I am very pleased that you were able to discover the problem yourself and put it up as a response. This should benefit the next programmer who wants to do something similar.
|
|
|
|
|
I have an object that calls a private method, 'populate', in a loop. I need each call to 'populate' to initiate a COM+ transaction.
'populate' instantiates and uses external objects which are configured to participate in the root transaction, but without creating a new root object with only a 'populate' method, I don't know how to initiate and commit the transaction.
Don't get ripped-off by the life assurance industry.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I was wondering whether its a good practise to use optional[^] attribute in IDL. Also I would like to know about using defaultvalue attribute along with optional attrbute.
Please help me with this.
Have a great day ahead!
Regards,
Sohail Kadiwala
(My Blog - http://blogs.wdevs.com/sohail/[^])
modified 21-Apr-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
MSComm32.ocx has the properties:
1) HRESULT CommID([in] long plCommID);
2) HRESULT CommID([out, retval] long* plCommID);
Note: lCommID is the handle to comm-port.
Now according to the MSDN Library, only the second one exist and is only accessible at run-time.
Question: Is it possible to assess the first one at run-time, in order to supply an existing handle.
I am writing a simple replacement TAPI control (replacing an existing unsupport simple control). The customer would prefer it is I used the MS Comm control, instead of the current Comm control (from same company as origanal TAPPI control).
Note: Origanal TAPI control has a bug in it.
Thanks!
INTP
"The more help VB provides VB programmers, the more miserable your life as a C++ programmer becomes."
Andrew W. Troelsen
|
|
|
|
|
How to have a safearray with of its data type as Safearray itself? How to put and get SafeArray within a safearray
Eg:Safearray of type VT_VARIANT can have int(VT_INT),bstr(VT_BSTR)similarly its should also safearray(VT_ARRAY)
Alamelu
|
|
|
|
|
I tried to make a DCOM, and got one problem, it work allright when the dll is placed on my computer with Windows XP, and client on another computer with the same OS, but if another computer Windows 2000 or something else it doesn't work, and client programm says "Invalid Pointer"
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi there,
Can anyone tell me how to set the initial postion of a deskband.
I have succesfull executed the Band Object Implementation Sample from MSDN
But the desk band Initially is always, docked on the taskbar.
What I want is, initially, the deskband to be docked on the right side of the screen.
Thanks in advance,
Kumar.
|
|
|
|
|
I've been given a task by my manager which I think is not possible to do. Our clients will be given an activeX control in which they will instantiate and make calls into. What we are trying to do is validate those calls into the activeX control. That is, when those calls are made, the parameters need to be checked and verified for proper values. Now the solution I have come up with, is to provide clients with my own activex control, which basically IS the actual activeX control they will be using except I added my own code to the implementation to do my validation and report to a file. Now in order for this to work, the client will need to instantiate MY activeX control instead of the real one, use MY activex control as if they were using the real one, and then I can validate that they are doing things properly. This of course requires the client to instantiate MY activex control hence build against my activex control. What she wants is this to be totally transparent to the client. That is, somehow do my validation on their calls to the real activex control but without getting them to have to rebuild against mine. So in other words, somehow intercept the calls from the client to the activex control and validate it with them knowing it. This sounds pretty serious in terms of security, and doesn’t seem doable. The real issue here is this: how do I get a client to use my activex control without them having to rebuild or even know that they're using my activex control? How could I make this validation totally transparent to the client? Can it be done?
|
|
|
|
|
Presumably you don't supply the original ActiveX control, or you'd simply add the validation code into that...
In terms of whether this is a security issue, I'd defer to Keith Brown; he's written a Universal Delegator, which will pretty much help you to do what you need. He's also the expert's expert on Windows Security, pretty much...
Check out this; Clickety[^]
Steve S
Developer for hire
|
|
|
|
|
yes, i wish i could modify the original activex to do my validation!
i'm going to check out that link. so i guess i'm right? without chaging the client code or rebuilding, they can't (normally) transparently do this.
|
|
|
|
|
thanks for the link. checked it out, but my question still remains. for the client to use this delegater that lets me do post-processing, the client still would need to build with this wrapper object, and use THAT object, right? that would still create the dependency for the client on using this delegator. this is essentially a wrapper, no? the key here is to keep the client totally oblivious to what's going on.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Folks,
I am trying to add EVENT HANDLING in the COM component (attributed) in Visual C++ 7.1. But, it takes a lot of time (around 250 ms on my machine) while executing "__raise" method call for each event. This is a serious problem for me as a typical operation in my program throws around 50 events and when 250 ms are clubbed together for these 50 events, the overall operation takes hell lot of time)
Following is the event related code I have added in my program:
*****************************************************************
[
dispinterface,
nonextensible,
uuid("4700BB55-A9D2-46f8-A453-EF8F9658E56F"),
helpstring("_IMyEvents Interface")
]
__interface _IMyEvents
{
[id(1), helpstring("method OnDataChanged")] HRESULT OnDataChanged();
}
class ATL_NO_VTABLE CMyData : public IMyData
{
public:
CMyData ();
virtual ~CMyData ();
__event __interface _IMyEvents;
HRESULT FireOnDataChanged()
{
__raise OnDataChanged(); // THIS CALL TAKES TIME
}
----------
----------
}
*****************************************************************
I would look forward to your suggestions & comments.
Regards,
Arun.
|
|
|
|
|
One more clue:
This COM component accesses a webservice and invoke some methods on it. The webservice is deployed in the Tomcat Container.
(May be this is creating some problem)
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
Does anyonesee the following problem?
I built a COM component, and when I run my program, there's an eeror message:
Debug assertion failed!
Program: D:programs\...
File: dbgdel.cpp
Line: 47
Expression: _BLOCK_TYPE_IS_VALID(pHeap->nBlockUse)
The strange this is that if I build a dll file only (not use COM technique), that problem doesn't happen even the codes in COM and dll are exactly the same.
Thanks in advance for any help.
Nga
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I have created an ATL dll which has a modeless dialog box containing a WebBrowser control. My problem is that whenever I'm pressing TAB key over the WebBrowser control, the focus is not shifting to other controls or links within the web page which is getting displayed within the control.
I have implemented a hook to trap WH_GETMESSAGE message, after that I'm able to get response from the 4 arrow keys and TAB key, but that too within the dialog box.
I have to make the TAB key acting normal within the WebBrowser control that is within that dialog box.
Can anyone of you help me out? Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Ashish
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Does anyone know how to throw exception in COM.
Thanks in advance
|
|
|
|
|
tpndtbk wrote:
Does anyone know how to throw exception in COM.
Till i know COM
doen't support any Exception handlling.
but there other way or hack to do that
-----------------------------
"I Think It Will Help"
-----------------------------
Alok Gupta
visit me at http://www.thisisalok.tk
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Alok,
You mean we can't throw exception in a COm interface function?
So what can we do if the exception happens??
|
|
|
|
|
Implement ISupportErrorInfo interface, and always try to get the HRESULT code. HRESULT tells whether the method executed successfully or some error occured.
I think this might be of your help.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks very much.
Year, I always use HRESULT code... But I mean, how to throw an error message that the user can catch it and see it.
|
|
|
|
|
tpndtbk wrote:
I always use HRESULT code... But I mean, how to throw an error message that the user can catch it and see it.
Sorry for replying late, Actually when your class inherited From ISupportInterface.
it has a special function name
Error which help you to send special human readable warning message or failure reason to client which using your component
-----------------------------
"I Think this Will Help"
-----------------------------
Alok Gupta
visit me at http://www.thisisalok.tk
|
|
|
|
|
Hi.
If, for example, you want to throw an exception from a certain method
"Test()" of a certain COM interface "IMyInterface", a possible simple solution is proposed below.
You can use either the macro "_com_raise_error(...)" or the command "throw _com_error(...)"
inside the method "Test()" for throwing an exception.
In the "client" of your "Test()" method, you can catch this exception as a "_com_error".
In the following you can find a code example.
Hoping this could help,
Manuele
Server
======
#include "comdef.h"
...
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
STDMETHODIMP CMyInterface::Test( int p_Int )
{
HRESULT l_HR = S_OK;
// Let's suppose we want to throw an exception if the
// parameter is zero.
if ( p_Int == 0 )
{
// Create a new error info object and fill it.
ICreateErrorInfo* l_CreateErrorInfo = NULL;
GUID l_GUID = CLSID_MyInterface;
l_HR = CreateErrorInfo( &l_CreateErrorInfo );
if ( ! SUCCEEDED( l_HR ) )
{
return E_FAIL;
}
l_CreateErrorInfo->SetDescription( L"Descrizione Errore" );
l_CreateErrorInfo->SetGUID( l_GUID );
l_CreateErrorInfo->SetHelpContext( 0 );
l_CreateErrorInfo->SetHelpFile( L"HelpFile" );
l_CreateErrorInfo->SetSource( L"Source" );
IErrorInfo* l_ErrorInfo = NULL;
l_HR = l_CreateErrorInfo->QueryInterface(
IID_IErrorInfo,
( void** ) &l_ErrorInfo );
if ( ! SUCCEEDED( l_HR ) )
{
return E_FAIL;
}
l_CreateErrorInfo->Release();
// Throw the just created error info object.
// Alternatively, here you can use
// "_com_raise_error( E_FAIL, l_ErrorInfo );" as well.
throw _com_error( E_FAIL, l_ErrorInfo );
return E_FAIL;
}
return S_OK;
}
Client
======
#import "..." no_namespace
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
HRESULT l_HR = S_OK;
IMyInterfacePtr l_MyPtr = NULL;
l_HR = CoInitialize( NULL ;
if ( ! SUCCEEDED( l_HR ) )
{
return E_FAIL;
}
l_HR = l_MyPtr.CreateInstance( __uuidof(MyInterface) );
if ( ! SUCCEEDED( l_HR ) )
{
return E_FAIL;
}
try
{
l_HR = l_MyPtr->Test( 0 );
}
catch( _com_error e )
{
// Here, you can get information made available
// by interface IErrorInfo
_bstr_t l_Description = e.Description();
DWORD l_HelpContext = e.HelpContext();
_bstr_t l_HelpFile = e.HelpFile();
_bstr_t l_Source = e.Source();
GUID l_GUID = e.GUID();
printf( "\nCOM exception caught\n\nDescription: %s, \
HelpContext: %u, HelpFile: %s, Source: %s, \
GUID: %X-%X-%X-%X",
( char* ) l_Description,
l_HelpContext,
( char* ) l_HelpFile,
( char* ) l_Source,
l_GUID.Data1,
l_GUID.Data2,
l_GUID.Data3,
l_GUID.Data4);
IErrorInfo* l_ErrorInfo = e.ErrorInfo( );
l_ErrorInfo->Release( );
}
catch( ... )
{
printf( "\nGeneric exception caught\n\n" );
}
// Release the smart pointer before calling CoUninitialize
l_MyPtr.Release( );
CoUninitialize( );
return 0;
}
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I would like to create a program that scans the outgoing and
incoming mails like Norton AntiVirus. From my searches I think Norton acts like SMTP+POP3 proxy. Norton does not want its users to change the server settings of their email clients to localhost to work with Norton mail scanning ( a kind of handfree approach). Can we create such a program.
So my idea is that a program that acts as a bridge between "actual mail client" and the email client and captures the incoming and outgoing mail and process those mails (virus scanning with clamav database).
Please help.........
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
