Faster method run at a time

Question

1.00/5 (2 votes)

See more:

C#

Is there any faster method other than Delegates to call more than one function at a time?

Posted 19-Sep-11 5:45am

softprga

Updated 19-Sep-11 5:46am

v2

Add a Solution

Comments

#realJSOP 19-Sep-11 11:49am

What does that mean?

Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov 19-Sep-11 11:53am

First, show you code with delegates and explain the requirements. Without it, this question does not sound like a sensible one.
--SA

Philippe Mori 19-Sep-11 21:20pm

If your application process a lot of data by calling a lot of function, then I would suggest you to try alternatives and measure them to see how the performance is affected.

For general applications, then simply select the best design for your application.

1 solution

Add a Solution

Add your solution here

Treat my content as plain text, not as HTML

Preview 0

…

Existing Members

Sign in to your account

...or Join us

Download, Vote, Comment, Publish.

Your Email
Password
Forgot your password?

Your Email
This email is in use. Do you need your password?
Optional Password

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Please subscribe me to the CodeProject newsletters

When answering a question please:

Read the question carefully.
Understand that English isn't everyone's first language so be lenient of bad spelling and grammar.
If a question is poorly phrased then either ask for clarification, ignore it, or edit the question and fix the problem. Insults are not welcome.
Don't tell someone to read the manual. Chances are they have and don't get it. Provide an answer or move on to the next question.

Let's work to help developers, not make them feel stupid.

This content, along with any associated source code and files, is licensed under The Code Project Open License (CPOL)

Rob Philpott · Answer 1 · 2011-09-19T06:16:00

Delegates are pretty quick, so it's unlikely you'd need something faster. When you say calling more than one function at a time, do you mean chaining multiple methods together on a delegate to call sequentially? I presume so, unless you referring to the asynchronous programming model for multithreaded access.

An alternative is to define a method on an interface, get all 'subscribers' to implement this and then just iterate over a collection calling the method, but frankly I have no idea whether that would be quicker. I *think* that's the way Java does it.