Is there a better solution to this?

Question

0.00/5 (No votes)

See more:

Hello All,
I am trying to monitor a third party application that is not supported anymore.
I currently have a process in a timer thats been set as SetTimer(1,1,NULL) that monitors a pixel as to when it changes color. Using the timer I have been able to capture 95 - 97% of the changes.
This is what I am using in the timer function:

static int Count=0;
CString Test;
HWND Monitoring_App = FindWindow(ClassName,NULL);
HDC hDC = GetDC(Monitoring_App);
COLORREF Color2Test = GetPixel(hDC,x,y);
ReleaseDC(Monitoring_App,hDC);
DeleteDC(hDC);
if(Color2Test == RGB(r,g,b))
{
Count++;
Test.Format("%d", Count);
m_CountText.SetWindowText(Test);
}
SetTimer(1,1,NULL);

Is there a better way to do this?
I could be wrong, will it be possible for me to capture the remainng 5 - 3 %, if I use a thread to monitor the change instead of the timer?
I have no clue about threads.
Once again any suggetions good or bad (there is never bad, we get to learn from them) will be greatly appreciated.

Posted 3-Jul-12 8:48am

FISH786

Add a Solution

Comments

Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov 3-Jul-12 15:28pm

Just a note:
The solution could be a bit worse or a bit better than yours, but it can never be "good". Not just "monitoring" of unsupported application not designed for such monitoring is wrong, just using of unsupported application is wrong. You will never be happy with that until you finally replace it with something supported...
--SA

Code-o-mat 3-Jul-12 15:39pm

Wouldn't your method fail if your monitored application's window is overlapped by some other window, minimized or hidden some way, like dragged off screen or somesuch?

FISH786 3-Jul-12 18:06pm

Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov:
Yes. I am trying to replace it just short of that 3-5%. However it's been a pain. It's just I am learning to programme at the same time.
Code-o-mat:
Yes. It does fail. However I am short of that 3-5% to be able to reverse engineer and replace it.

Stefan_Lang 5-Jul-12 8:07am

On a sidenote, if you wish to reply to someone's comment, please use the [Reply] link at the top right of that comment. Your comment here is just a comment to your own posting and the only person being notified of it will be you. ;-)

2 solutions

Add a Solution

Add your solution here

Treat my content as plain text, not as HTML

Preview 0

…

Existing Members

Sign in to your account

...or Join us

Download, Vote, Comment, Publish.

Your Email
Password
Forgot your password?

Your Email
This email is in use. Do you need your password?
Optional Password

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Please subscribe me to the CodeProject newsletters

When answering a question please:

Read the question carefully.
Understand that English isn't everyone's first language so be lenient of bad spelling and grammar.
If a question is poorly phrased then either ask for clarification, ignore it, or edit the question and fix the problem. Insults are not welcome.
Don't tell someone to read the manual. Chances are they have and don't get it. Provide an answer or move on to the next question.

Let's work to help developers, not make them feel stupid.

This content, along with any associated source code and files, is licensed under The Code Project Open License (CPOL)

enhzflep · Accepted Answer · 2012-07-03T09:46:00

Okay then,

This method that you've employed is known as polling. It is notorious for two reasons -
(a) cpu resources are used even when there's nothing new to report.
(b) when more than 1 target event occurs between polling events, you lose data.

An option that come to mind is that of subclassing the window.

It will require some knowledge of how the program works internally.

Subclassing the window has the consequence that you'll know of the event before it happens, but won't get another notification until just before the next event happens. This will complicate logic somewhat if you want to do anything with the new data, other than just count the times it changes.

I'd look at the program using OllyDbg or IDA Pro if I knew what it was.

Espen Harlinn · Accepted Answer · 2012-07-03T10:04:00

Solution 2

Inject a dll into the legacy application, perhaps using CreateRemoteThread[^] or by listing your dll under the HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Windows\AppInit_DLLs registry key.

Once you have code running inside the process you can get the original procedure for the window you want to monitor using the GetWindowLongPtr[^] and the replace it with your own procedure using SetWindowLongPtr[^].

You will then be able to handle each WM_PAINT message for the window you want to monitor after you have called the original windows procedure.

Best regards
Espen Harlinn

Posted 3-Jul-12 10:04am

Espen Harlinn

Comments

enhzflep 3-Jul-12 17:03pm

My +5 - I'd forgotten about the requirement to be running in the same process to snag the WNDPROC. On a side note, SetWindowLongPtr will return the old WNDPROC when you replace the WNDPROC - you don't need to get it first.

Espen Harlinn 3-Jul-12 17:05pm

True - and thanks :-D

FISH786 3-Jul-12 18:15pm

Espen Harlinn:

I am just learning to programme. If I understood your Solution correct. In short first I would be creating a Hook for WM_PAINT to the thirdparty application and if WM_PAINT gives location of the paint, I should have the full 100% from this process.
If I am right, there will be work cut out for me. :)
Thank you.

Espen Harlinn 4-Jul-12 3:52am

The code for the handling would be similar to what you've got. In windows programming a hook has a special meaning, what I propose is often called window subclassing - and, yes, you should get a 100% :-D

FISH786 6-Jul-12 20:24pm

One last question I hope. How do I convert the screen coordinates that I got from WM_PAINT to the client coordinates?

Espen Harlinn 7-Jul-12 5:19am

Have a look at GetDeviceCaps
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd144877(VS.85).aspx

FISH786 7-Jul-12 13:51pm

I have been reading and trying to understand. However, I am not sure what else am I using to get the actual coordnates after I use HORZRES and VERTRES. I can only for sure do a multiplication with the 2 numbers, however not sure from the list what to use to divide the result by.

Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov 4-Jul-12 0:31am

This is a kind of hack which works, my 5.
--SA

Espen Harlinn 4-Jul-12 3:53am

Thank you, Sergey :-D

FISH786 4-Jul-12 6:29am

Well I really appreciate the help and Ty all.