|
Where does it say that? And if so, why not list the top fifteen?
|
|
|
|
|
|
I still don't see where they referenced any top ten or twenty list.
|
|
|
|
|
The word 'this' in the survey description is a link.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, so it is, not very obvious; no underline, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
You realise that list is just the number of times that the language appears in google search? It's not a measure of how much the language is actaully used. For instance, just by saying "C++, C++, C++, C++, C++, C++, C++, C++" the TIODE popularity for c++ increases
|
|
|
|
|
I merely identified the source of the list. I don't think the TIOBE list is actually useful.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
There are scary number of C++ developers here, this is making me nervous. I thought they are long gone... and we (C# devs) are the cool guys
|
|
|
|
|
Don't know about cool, but when we start talking about being actually useful, nothing beats C++[^]:
|
|
|
|
|
Nemanja Trifunovic wrote: Don't know about cool, but when we start talking about being actually useful, nothing beats
C++[^]:
I would replace "useful" with "complex" or "massive scale". C# can be used to write useful apps.
|
|
|
|
|
Nish Sivakumar wrote: C# can be used to write useful apps
In theory
|
|
|
|
|
I started coding in C# 3 years ago and have not looked back ever since. My productivity has greatly increased. I do not miss C++ at all.
|
|
|
|
|
If that fits your needs, by all means go for it. It's, after all, right tool for the job.
Nuclear launch detected
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pointless discussion. Just use an appropriate tool for the job in hand.
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
They are actually getting more. Over christmas I threw Visual Studio off my notebook, along with the rest of the Mickeysoft stuff. And then I got myself a nice free IDE, the Open Watcom C++ compiler and tons of open source libraries.
Ok, the Watcom compiler once was one of the best you could have, but probably has not kept up well after it was not commercial anymore. It probably will eventually have to be replaced, but for now it is a pleasure to use it again.
Farewell Mickeysoft, and thanks for all the fish
|
|
|
|
|
Check out clang[^], although (unless you fancy struggling with the hell that is GNU on Windows) you may need to get MSVC back on to get it built.
|
|
|
|
|
Rutvik Dave wrote: I thought they are long gone... and we (C# devs) are the cool guys
I just showed a 1920x1200 full screen Mandelbrot renderer to my C# coworkers that allowed you to zoom in using the mouse wheel, and left-click-drag to pan around. Works at 50 frames per second using double precision math so you can zoom in to the point where the whole set would be the size of the orbit of Pluto. Possible due to it being coded in Microsoft's C++AMP and exectuted on a high end AMD graphics card. Whos Cool Now!
|
|
|
|
|
Ya ya ya... Whatever...!
|
|
|
|
|
I saw that same sample code in Visual C++ 2012. It is extremely cool. I wish I understood the Direct X components of that software.
|
|
|
|
|
I wrote my own C++/AMP routine because all the samples I saw only used single precision floating point which gives you a very shallow zoom before you can't generate any more detail. There isn't much to the DirectX side, just setting up the device, the thing which I found confused others when they looked at the code was the C++ Lambda function which you can find described here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anonymous_function#C.2B.2B[^]
|
|
|
|
|
I bet that the vast majority of you, C# developers don't know C++, while the vast majority of us, the C++ developers do know C#. What does that tell about you and us, huh?
|
|
|
|
|
I completely agree with you. Once you learn C++, C# and Java got really easy to learn.
Happy Programming
|
|
|
|
|
Absolutely correct.
C# and it's ilk are just cheap knock-offs of the real thing.
The most realistic analogy fathomable is that it's much like a comparing plastic inflatable vs. a real woman.
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | "As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error." - Weisert | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
W∴ Balboos wrote: comparing plastic inflatable vs. a real woman.
Meaning C# has fewer holes? Yes.
|
|
|
|