|
Works in IE11.
|
|
|
|
|
Works in Chrome too. At the moment anyway.
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
Possibly it cached the CSS, maybe if you try with Ctrl-F5 (or the same combination under chrome to force-reload the page) it will give you the same result. Under firefox I can view the buttons disabling the CSS.
Geek code v 3.12
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
I use 1TBS
|
|
|
|
|
You are correct, but it works in IE8 under Windows XP (even after <Ctrl><F5>).
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
Without the CSS it works perfectly and shows all the buttons. Maybe it is a test to be come CP troublemakershooter?
Geek code v 3.12
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
I use 1TBS
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like there's a typo in the HTML:
<tr class="footer dektop-only tablet-only" style="vertical-align:top;">
Changing that to desktop-only with the dev tools makes the row appear.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Bingo.
1:30AM. Everything works. Time to deploy. Oh, hang on: missed one bit, this will take me 2 seconds and it won't affect anything anyway.
...fast forward 6 hrs, screaming mayhem, thunder, lightning, large prehistoric lizards toppling buildings...
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Dogs and cats living together?
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Stallman using Windows, Apple products working with hardware standards...
Yeah - chaos.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: this will take me 2 seconds and it won't affect anything anyway It's a trap! I've fell for them more often than I'd like to admit
|
|
|
|
|
Same problem as the previously reported "Notification window" from me and others.
Geek code v 3.12
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
I use 1TBS
|
|
|
|
|
The notification window doesn't open fully, it opens just for a handful of pixels, not many under the beginning of the orange rectangle with CP logo.
I can't upload images nor I can access the big NET to use handy services as tinypic or similar...
Geek code v 3.12
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
I use 1TBS
|
|
|
|
|
When i move mouse cursor over notification icon, a drop-down with list of notifications is inaccessible, because is hidden behind the ads.
Tested on FireFox and IE.
Does anybody else have these symptoms observed?
|
|
|
|
|
Same for the menu that opens when you hove your user name next to it...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
I would have replied to the previous requests but... no clicky-linky for me! Did I spam so much?
Geek code v 3.12
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
I use 1TBS
|
|
|
|
|
den2k88 wrote: I would have replied to the previous requests This[^] works.
You have just been Sharapova'd.
|
|
|
|
|
I reply to this: the html code shows the links but they're not visible. Coupled with the notifications and popup troubles I'd say CSS is gone awry!
Geek code v 3.12
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
I use 1TBS
|
|
|
|
|
Seems to be some redundancy[^] on name and time at the moment.
<edit>Seems to be fixed</edit>
modified 27-Apr-15 14:25pm.
|
|
|
|
|
or the "Reply", "Email", etc., options on forum messages are not visible anymore?
Checked in Firefox 36 and Chrome 42.0.
I ain't got no signature.
|
|
|
|
|
Seems like a markup-breakdown.
$('.tablet-only').show();
makes those options 'visible' though.
You have just been Sharapova'd.
|
|
|
|
|
Now, this is brilliant! 5ed and you'd deserve more, like "give a ton of your rep to a member that deserves them"
Geek code v 3.12
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
I use 1TBS
|
|
|
|
|
You flatter me, sir.
Just to let you know that line showcases almost 90% of my knowledge of CSS and JQuery.
You have just been Sharapova'd.
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe the amount of posts from yesterday was enough so Chris closed the party...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I'm concerned about having too many devastatingly bad questions staying too long time in the Q&A forum. But I'm concerned with not-so-bad questions auto-removed too early as well. So, my idea is: different kinds of abuse reports on questions should not be treated equally; they should come with different weights. I'll try to motivate it.
Yes, I understand it can further complicate the system and means extra work. However, weighted system is already applied to votes. So… Let me explain the situation with one particular kind of report, "Unclear or Incomplete" on questions.
As I can see, presently 3 reports on one question in all report categories. If this is spam or abuse or "not a question" or off-topic, this is pretty likely not wrong. Also, I don't think "Unclear or Incomplete" report should ever be ignored. Automatically closing the question on many such reports would blocks some pretty usual situation when an inquirer never really clarify the question, keeping silence or replying not to the point, plays absentmindedly.
But another typical situation with "Unclear or Incomplete" is: the answer is worth answering, but some clarifications are really required; an inquirer has a good chance to make the problem either clear and answerable, or demonstrate the inability to formulate it, but is not given a chance to do so, because the question is closed too early. Note that we don't see already posted reports, we just mark the question unclear hoping for further clarification, but not immediate removal of the question. Giving the "Unclear or Incomplete" report some less weight, for example, something like 1/3, would probably do the trick in a simplest way.
I'm tired of giving at least some answers or comments to help some inquirers who really deserve some help (which could be easy to give on some minimal clarification) but loose the questions and those answers and comments prematurely, before they get a chance to improve questions. At the same time, some never will clarify things. Just shifting balance a bit on this particular report could improve the acceptance of out answers and, hence, general usefulness of the forum.
(My previous question on related issue (on this forum) was: do the inquirers receive the answers on removed questions, which are not visible to other members? I'm afraid not. Is that so?)
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
Good idea, Sergey!
My 5 cents to this statement:
Quote: I'm tired of giving at least some answers or comments to help some inquirers who really deserve some help (which could be easy to give on some minimal clarification) but loose the questions and those answers and comments prematurely, before they get a chance to improve questions. At the same time, some never will clarify things. Just shifting balance a bit on this particular report could improve the acceptance of out answers and, hence, general usefulness of the forum.
I'd suggest to write a help topic "How to improve question" which might be helpful for questioners in understanding what they do wrong. First flag "Unclear or incomplete" should effective a comment with link the mentioned topic. When another member will use "Unclear or incomplete" report, need to provide some extra info why the question is still unclear. Then 3 votes/reports will be enough.
|
|
|
|