|
See my recent post in the lounge.
When I posted the topic, I changed my sig and it posted. I replied, and I still have my old sig. I replied again, same old sig.
Something subtle is going on that I am missing. Do I need to logout and log back in? Is this a cache issue?
Charlie Gilley
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
Has never been more appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm pretty sure that that is by design: you change your sig via the Username dropdown "My Settings" and selecting the "Forums and QA" tab.
The one on the "Message" page is a temporary change.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
|
And I suppose I could have done my homework first instead of soliciting the comments of the EXPERTS before putting this, my neck, on the block to see if this "topic" is not indeed a well rounded discussion already ... and from that draw the actual attention I wish to bring here, and thereby itch my own rub, but I'd like to suggest that somehow, some way the format disposed by the server as a webpage of Questions tagged by the user's choice and given some sort of the kind offered (unanswered|active|new\top rated), where indicative of the "Page 1 of 21" (lower left) followed by the first ten page links (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10), and then immediately to the lower right where both "First dot Prev dot Next" become instrumental in switching to the next fetchable set in the 21 total ... the returned set for "Next" actually be 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19. and 20; not page "2" of "21". For example here: Quick Answers[^]
After all, isn't the lower right hand apellative of "Next" refering to the next set of ten found items tagged as what the user wishes to narrow his list of possible entries by using a filter?
I could post an image of what happens when I pick "Next" at this first filtering and what you would see in that image is the "Page 2 of 21" message that would be propagated by a mouseclick on "2". And I could spell out the word "REDUNDANCY" in Photoshop, copy and paste that image for further effect but I think anyone who is unalienably amenable to comments, agent of CP or no, would agree that the first paragraph of description of my observation should suffice. 
|
|
|
|
|
I have to disagree here. In every online page navigation UI I've ever seen, "next" takes you to the "next page", not the "next set of page numbers".
And I imagine that going from page 1 to page 2 is far more common than wanting to jump from page 1 directly to page 11.
As for the "redundancy": yes, you could find the specific page you're on, find the link to the next page number, and click on that. But that takes more effort than just clicking on the "next" link. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
W11/Edge.
Clicked an article in email, logged into article in browser, clicked bookmark which had a busy on it for a couple of minutes, after which the page updated as bookmarked.
However once the page had loaded, duplicating the page or attempting to load the user bookmarks page, or even CodeProject Home got the above error. Edge tools was there for more info, didn't occur to open them.
Clearing the cookies for the site and logging back in, BAU. 
From the above, and looking through what it's built with, and these answers:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58215104/whats-the-neterr-http2-protocol-error-about? , could be anything really at first blush, or can it be narrowed down at all?
Thanks.
Seg-asparating Coding
modified 4 days ago.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
I have been receiving The Insider Daily newsletter regularly since I joined.
However, since about a week ago I no longer receive this even though it is still marked as subscribed in My Settings.
Have you stopped publishing this or is there a bug in your distribution list?
Hoping this can be resolved.
Thank you and best regards.
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like a stop.
Let's see what happens
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
They said they were on vacation in a news article, but that same article also says they would be back by Monday (yesterday as of this writing) but I haven't seen much activity yet. Guess we'll have to wait a little longer
|
|
|
|
|
When I try to download any project after signing in, I get a message
"Ticket:
Error: An error occurred in this page. The error has been recorded and the site administrator informed.
Abort, Retry, Fail?"
For example, either download link on https://www.codeproject.com/Articles/6237/Enhanced-MFC-Message-Boxes.
|
|
|
|
|
On my side, I can download both zip without any problem.
|
|
|
|
|
Why did my codeoroigect emails stop on aug 31. I used to get two emails a day.
|
|
|
|
|
I also have experienced this. I get the daily build but not the daily insider
|
|
|
|
|
I'm having the same problem. Even tried re-subscribing.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm having the same problem.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ditto. No newsletters for me either.
if (Object.DividedByZero == true) { Universe.Implode(); }
|
|
|
|
|
Same here, I really miss my daily dose of news
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same Issue here. 
|
|
|
|
|
Ditto. I love the daily insider.
|
|
|
|
|
SUGGESTION put " do not reply Google it " back to rules
on more serious note
would it be possible to somehow add a note
"posting development software (IDE) question - like "QtCreator " or "Eclipse" is OK "
or
Add "post created with AI assistance help"
note should be added when appropriate
Cheers
|
|
|
|
|
Lol, and maybe also, do not answer before 8am?  
|
|
|
|
|
jana_hus wrote: "posting development software (IDE) question - like "QtCreator " or "Eclipse" is OK "
Already available, just use the correct forum.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris has previously expressed his distaste for the "let me Google that for you" site.
However, if someone posts a question that shows zero effort, which the poster could easily have solved by typing their question into a search engine and reading some of the results, then "google it" can be a perfectly valid response.
Aside from the ongoing enshitification of Google's results, the main reason for it becoming less useful as an answer is the huge number of almost-identical questions with "google it" as the answer, which push the actual answer further down the list. But that's not an argument against "google it" answers; that's an argument for closing the low-quality zero-effort questions so that they're not indexed by search engines.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
