|
Can you please try again? Should be fixed.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Chris. Yes, it is OK now.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi.
I recently got my technical blog up on code project. Less than a day later my account was closed because I was reported as a spammer.
I have no clue why. And I can't get back into my account. How do I fix this? I haven't spammed (as far as I know). I know one article was declined, and I understand - but it doesn't make me a spammer.
My actual account is: Member 11381994
|
|
|
|
|
I believe it was because of the high number of outside links you posted in your technical blog posts. There were various invitations to check out courses or books, that may have been inferred as spamming. Also, your posts are very blog-like (as one would expect), but we're ideally looking for blog entries that better resemble articles. Closer to this: SignalR + RX (Streaming Data Demo App 1 of 2)[^].
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
I did not intent to spam at least. The one with the course I agree with and should not have been in the ones that came to CodeProject. The book review I feel better about, because its a darn good book I really liked
The blog is a mix of technical and softer topics (for technical people).
If that sort of content is not welcome here I will not bother you anymore, but I would very much like my account back
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately the book review is not quite in line with what we would like for Book Reviews, though I could tell by reading it that he inspired you a lot, which is good.
You account should be restored, but I would avoid posting any outside links on the site from here on out.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
I will avoid that
But I outside links are OK if its reference material I believe could be useful? Or is that not allowed either?
|
|
|
|
|
Please avoid doing so.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Roger that! Is there any measures I need to take in order to get my account unlocked?
|
|
|
|
|
Should be re-actived now
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
I was reading this article in the moderation queue
http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?aid=871778&av=1300074&msg=4992947#_comments[^]
I was trying to flag it appropriately and the moderation functionality is missing I have tried a ctrl f5 on the page but no moderation functionality on the page.
Using Opera 27.0, have also tried in on Chrome too and it is the same.
Forget it as when I reloaded just it appears to be working
Every day, thousands of innocent plants are killed by vegetarians.
Help end the violence EAT BACON
|
|
|
|
|
I think this bug came up a while ago as well but can't seem to find it now.
I just edited a question (just some language improvements and cosmetics) and the question shows as edited but the name from the editor shows as '(no name)'.
Is this intended, caching issue, ... ?
I have a screen shot if you want it.
Link to question:
How to select a record in T_SQL useing stored procedure[^]
Tom
|
|
|
|
|
A question is repeated twice and both times it got some good solutions.Can we consider it as a repost .Because by doing so it will affect the solutions too
|
|
|
|
|
It would be good if the solutions from a reposted question could be moved to the original question.
Of course, that would require that we identify the original question when reporting a repost. Which probably wouldn't be a bad idea, apart from the extra workload for the hamsters to implement it!
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Is it possible to get to the normal web site format using a tablet, I get the mobile view on a 12" tablet and it looks bloody ridiculous, I can read it from 15 paces.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Go to extreme bottom-> Click on Full-site.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
Shock, horror, it worked. Thanks Rohan.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Do remember how to do it - it undoes itself every couple of days on mine...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Can you please go to here[^] on your tablet and email me the results? chris at codeproject...
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Cant login via Facebook.
Got such an error - facebook url does not match the application settings.
|
|
|
|
|
We've opened a ticket with Facebook but still not heard back from them
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Right now, this[^] is in moderation queue. I reported as 'Extremely poor quality'. What makes me think is, there is published version also : Add a Favicon[^]. How such content is getting approved? I think its time to redefine what 'Article' or Tip/Trick means.
Its Tip/Trick. As per our guidelines, Tip/Trick = Problem and quick solution to it. In this case, there is no problem or solution. It should be noted that we consider some short Articles as Tip/Trick,but adding favicon to site? How to consider it a Tip/Trick?
Suggestion : It would be great if names of those who approved gets displayed.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Rohan, I agree with you that a lot of very marginal stuff is getting through as "articles;" I am not sure what I can do about that. My "standards" for written work are so "high," that I haven't been able to bring myself to getting into that aspect of participation on the site, fearing I would be too intolerant.
«I'm asked why doesn't C# implement feature X all the time. The answer's always the same: because no one ever designed, specified, implemented, tested, documented, shipped that feature. All six of those things are necessary to make a feature happen. They all cost huge amounts of time, effort and money.» Eric Lippert, Microsoft, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
His friend[^] was working on one article at that time and he published this[^]
I am trying to find Article on : Drag controls from toolbox and put them on page.
:thud: :thud:
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
Even if the article/tip is published, you can report it.
That is the way, we can clean the poor articles/tips.
Different moderators view might be different for the same article/tip which is marginally correct/wrong. I think because of this reason, approver's names are not getting displayed: To avoid argument among moderators.
My Suggestion: In 1 or 2 cases when article is marginally OK, i have approved it and then felt that there should be take back option.
Life is a computer program and everyone is the programmer of his own life.
|
|
|
|