|
And the answer I usually get for something like this: this happens only to you
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah - sorry about that. We spent a distracting day cleaning out the database from the remnants of the spammers. The further we got along the faster things went and we're pretty much caught up now. During the scrubbing the database was a little distracted.
Sorry about the timing but the spammers aren't being as considerate as one would wish.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
There is a password site called BugMeNot which provides login details for those who don;t want to set up a new account. And it shows quite a few CP login details: codeproject.com passwords - BugMeNot[^]
But ... StackOverflow is barred, so you can't post them there: stackoverflow.com passwords - BugMeNot[^]
Shouldn't CP be the same, given it fits the "Community" criteria in the same way as SO?
Quote: Sites should only appear blocked here if they match one or more of the following criteria:
Pay-per-view: users pay money to access the site
Community: users register only to add/change content (but not to view)
Fraud risk: user accounts contain sensitive details e.g. banks, online stores, etc
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Previously:
Block CodeProject From password sharing site[^] - April 2008
Look at this![^] - September 2014
The danger of bugmenot.com logins[^] - September 2018
Last update from Chris: "We keep an eye on them"
The "community" option on their removal form explicitly excludes sites where you have to register to "view or download attachments". IIRC, unregistered users can't download code from articles.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I know - but if SO can be excepted, shouldn't CP as well?
Until today I didn't even know they had an exceptions list!
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I guess their argument would be that you don't have to sign in to SO to download anything.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Personally I'm not fussed if people choose to refer to a list of accounts that are not even vaguely reliable. BugMeNot would do a better service if they actually removed the listings that were bogus.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Please, oh most Honorable Hamsters, can we have a message at the top of the bugs'n'sugs page outlining how to navigate to delete an account? It would save a bit of grief for both those who want to leave and those of us that have to point the way.
Cheers,
Peter
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
You're assuming that those who want to leave would read the message.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, probably a vain hope, since they cannot find (or read) their own account page.
|
|
|
|
|
Now the account page is not that intuitive and I can feel with the members having problems to find the relevant section.
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
You are right. Maybe the "Close My Account" part would be better on the main page.
|
|
|
|
|
Does it really need to be that obvious? Have you ever tried to find it on FarceBook, or Twatter, or even SO?
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Well ... yes, for the people who are not bright enough even to find their own account page. And, no, for those who are super intelligent; like um ...
|
|
|
|
|
Good Day
I have gone through all my online profiles and found that I have too many on Code Project, would you please delete this profile for me?
tiaanc348@gmail.com
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
Unless you are logged into the account using your email and password, it probably won't be deleted for you - and since you have posted the same request from two different accounts already, it's unlikely you are.
If you can log in under that account, you can delete it yourself:
1) Hover over your username at the top right of the page. A drop down list will open.
2) Select "My Settings" from the list.
3) In the resulting page, select the "Privacy" tab.
4) There are two options:
4.1) Under "Account status" there is a checkbox "Close my account"
4.2) Under "Forget me Forever" there is a checkbox "Forget me. Forever."
5) Select the appropriate checkbox, make sure that "I have read and agree..." is ticked, and press "Save my Settings".
6) The rest is history ... as is your account.
But requesting a closed account just based on the email could far too easily be malicious, so it's much better that the owner logs in and does it themselves.
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Good Day
I have gone through all my online profiles and found that I have too many on Code Project, would you please delete this profile for me?
tiaanc348@hotmail.com
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
Go to your settings page (Hover over your name at top right). Select the privacy tab and take it from there.
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Why this
Here: bank project[^]
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
It is not submitted as an article, but as a project. Maybe that is the default behaviour for projects in the queue? It surprised me, too.
noop()
|
|
|
|
|
For me it looks like submitted as an article (and only the subject contains "project"):
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I remember it had been submitted as a project in the first place. Maybe the revision has been made under a different type.
noop()
|
|
|
|
|
that is something like "out of memory" for my brain
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Nah, probably just a stack-overflow
noop()
|
|
|
|
|
Take this page for instance: generic Java question returns displaying page 45[^]
... scrolling down to the bottom page selection (widget(sp?)) ...
If I select the "previous" page (44) I don't GET the previous page.
Instead I'm rocketted to today's new entries. Likewise, if I don't scroll to the bottom of the page 45, and thus never see that I'm actually on some page in the distant past, and click "prev" above me ...
I'm rocketted to today's entries.
I know, I've just got too much time on my hands and need to get a better hobby.
[EDIT]
Ok, THAT link is not at all what I pasted into the Bugsug Message box ... so ... what to do.
REPASTE:
retaining jquery datepicker data between views in ASP:MultiView - JavaScript Discussion Boards[^]
That's not a thread at all. Whatever. Never mind. Move along. Nothing to see here.
[END EDIT]
|
|
|
|