|
I just noticed that the Q&A list does not show the solved tick for those questions where my solution was accepted.
|
|
|
|
|
Can you show me an example? I'm looking at QA and seeing lots of questions with ticks besides them.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I think he means that if his solution is the accepted one, then the question does not show a tick. (If you already figured that out, then sorry).
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
---
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
|
|
|
|
|
I see ticks too. But not for those questions that has been answered by me and got accepted as solution. When I go to the list of answers on my profile page, the tick is shown. I will send you a mail with a screen shot.
[UPDATE]
Another answer (How Can I Mask A Password With '*****' In Unix Using C++?[^]) has just been accepted and is shown with a tick mark. It seems that only answers from a limited time period are affected. So you should not spend too much time in the investigation.
modified 18-Nov-14 4:55am.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
example: http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?waid=149272&aid=842542[^]
it was a blog and was changed unadvertently to article with an edition. It is not the first time it happened. I have checked with a tip/trick and the editor has taken the current type of the post into the edition window.
It is easy to oversee it when one is focused with the content, specially if it is supposed to get the current type pre-edition into the selected type. I don't think that the CP-editors make such error or change it on purpose, so I suppose that there is something happening with the type of the contributions when being edited.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
As I see the link is to the response on the deleted message, which was not deleted...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Follow the first link to the search page, not the link to the article message.
The text on the search page shows the spam content, which isn't on the article messages.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Now I see what do you mean...I was following the link on the search page without reading the text on the search page itself...
Now I know how to read spam messages removed before I got there 
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
By the way. Who 'Lucie' is?!
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have just been editing an article in Moderation from this author, the code block formatting was screwed it is now back in the moderation queue for review.
|
|
|
|
|
I noticed.
I guess it's a case of "wait and see" if she spammifies it.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
It had a link in the first version on "Mobile app devlopment" phrase, which took you to mobiers website. I mafe a comment and she removed it and also tried to fix the code formatting but failed.
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: I've seen that name before
Yes, not only about spam. I reported her some days ago because of some plagiarized snaps in an article
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks mate. We will get this sorted.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I had known about this for ages and it was a handy way of finding out what somebody had wrote once a message had been deleted.
|
|
|
|
|
I think "Was" is the operative word! 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I prefer the cleaned up alternative. Specially when following spammers.
It was quite annoying to open a pile of messages just to see that they already were deleted.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Plus, if deleted spam can show up two months later, then the spammers win. And I'm not in favour of that!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
The recent change to the moderation feedback counter, i,e, now you have the red circle with the number reminds me that there is an inconsistency with the feedback notification. It has been there for a while, but just more noticeable with the red blobs.
On an article / tip moderation etc. there are the 2 areas of notification, one to the far right opposite the username and user icon and the other in the moderation panel to the right of the 'Approve.......'
I have noticed that the blob can appear in one of three ways;
1) To the right of the Approve statement
2) To the right of the Username/User picture
3) Both simultaneously.
I can't remember which action triggers #3, but certainly noticed both #1 and #2 this morning while going through the articles and tips in the queue.
I think this need to be reviewed to make sure it is a consistent user experience.
I'll pay a bit more attention and see what actions result in what locations of feedback and report back in there is anything conclusive.
Cheers,
|
|
|
|
|
We should remove the one at the top right if the approval widget is being shown.
Would that help?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Yes that would probably help.
I did notice yesterday, that clicking an item in the approval menu (typically one of the non-approve items) it goes up to the report flag locations at the top right, but if you click again an item, it then goes to the Approve location, so you end up with both blobs visible.
Also, on the Member Profile, the flag doesn't look right where it is. I would maybe move the member bookmark to the top left of the image, and put the flag to the top right of the image, or put them both side by side at the top right (with the flag on far right) or you maybe have other ideas.
|
|
|
|
|
How is it now?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Yep, that appears better with only the 1 location. 
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
