|
CPIAC2013[^]
I guess the info provided is not wrong anywhere in the timeline.
kinda pay back to CP! 
Starting to think people post kid pics in their profiles because that was the last time they were cute - Jeremy.
|
|
|
|
|
How about a checkbox or filter (I think the current filters are inclusive not exclusive) to hide contest entries from the latest updates or latest articles?
I think a lot of good articles are getting buried by contest entries. I'm not really interested in reading a one or two paragraph contest entry, but I do want to read the articles. Its slightly annoying to have to dig back through a few pages of contest entries to find meaty articles.
Easy? Hard? Not sure, but I think it would be beneficial if it could be put in!
|
|
|
|
|
This is already meant to be happening.
Which page are you seeing this on?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
That moment when you think the OP is closeing your questions just for the fun of it. I'm sure that if a question is a question then a question is a question, huh. So if a question is closed then is it not a question? But if some one asks a question like "how do I do this?" Then I'm sure that it shouldn't get taken down, because its a question, jus the cause some one might not justify the question as good dosent mean it should be taken down, I think OP should leave it there for people to find and if there is no answers for that question, lets say 5days then it should be taken down, not on in the first 10mins, and also a post should not be taken down if there are answers on it, I would say that is slack, taking Down a question if it already had answers on it, come on, that answer may have been the answer to the question!.
Anyway sorry, that's me getting just getting frustrated at things, I thought I'd let you know.
|
|
|
|
|
Reminds me of a scene from Big Bang Theory:
Leonard: <Nonsensical spaghetti logic rant about Penny>
Sheldon: You're a lucky man Leonard.
Leonard: Why's that?
Sheldon: You're talking to one of 3 people in the western hemisphere capable of following that train of thought.
Leonard: So, what do you think?
Sheldon: I said I could follow it, not that I cared.
Don't worry Leonard, Sheldon is here 
|
|
|
|
|
What? *Brain Overloads*
Keep Clam And Proofread
--
√(-1) 23 ∑ π...
And it was delicious.
|
|
|
|
|
Not all "how do I do this?" questions are equal.
"I need to write a website for my school project. How do I do this?"
or
"I'm trying to connect to a webservice, here's my code [...]. It keeps throwing error "...". How do I do this?"
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: I'm trying to connect to a webservice, here's my code [...]. It keeps throwing error
Still having problems with that web service I see. 
|
|
|
|
|
When I visit a question, then sometimes there is a long comment (containing a ton of code for example), then I would like to collapse it so I don't have to scroll a long time when I want to scroll to another answer.
I also suggest to add this link also on deleted comments: when a comment contains a lot of code, then it is mostly deleted, and some members have the privilege to see deleted comments, so it would be nice that there would be a link to collapse them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't need that button. CP is already on my "Most visited" page 
|
|
|
|
|
I am editing this article [^] its originally written by Vince, however when i submit it back, the original author name is lost and its replaced by mine.
I tried remove my name from author, however unable to do so. Could someone from admin team restore the order
"Opinions are neither right nor wrong. I cannot change your opinion. I can, however, change what influences your opinion." - David Crow
Never mind - my own stupidity is the source of every "problem" - Mixture
cheers,
Alok Gupta
VC Forum Q&A :- I/ IV
Support CRY- Child Relief and You
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, he placed it in the right forum. This forum is frequented more by the site team.
|
|
|
|
|
That's fine. I thought the problem is related to Article,so he can have quick response in Article's Forum.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
No, the problem was related to the submit wizard or any other intern thing.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
All fixed.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
I replied to a message in this thread (Thread[^] from Mark_Wallace, and it appeared under a later thread by him in the same thread.
(It should be obvious which are at fault by the content)
Is something up with the "Reply" mechanism.
"If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough."
Alan Kay.
|
|
|
|
|
This article is currently in the moderation queue, but at the top of the article it says it's an old version of the currently published article:
http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?waid=90103&aid=644687[^]
I don't know what to do when I come across that.
[EDIT]
Well, it is no longer showing up in the queue. I wonder if anyone was able to check it out before it got straightened out.
[/EDIT]
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
modified 3-Sep-13 3:55am.
|
|
|
|
|
I have recently posted an article and have been told by a number of work colleagues that they have been unable to vote on the article as the IP address has already been used to vote even when they are logged in.
"Someone at your IP address has already voted for this item."
I work in an enterprise environment where all internet traffic is managed via a dedicated proxy server. As such, all connections to CodeProject from the enterprise will be seen by CodeProject to be coming from a single IP address. I understand the reason why multiple votes from a single IP address are prevented, but I fail to see the reason why the IP restriction holds when multiple logins are used.
It is quite disheartening when the work put into creating an article is not able to be recognised by colleagues.
|
|
|
|
|
John, first of all, thank you for taking the time and effort to write an article for CodeProject. While I do sympathise with your frustration over your colleagues being unable to vote en masse for your article, the IP restriction was put in place to prevent a single person creating multiple accounts and using them to mass vote/downvote. Unfortunately, the measures mere made necessary because of idiots who try to abuse CodeProject. Sorry.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Pete for the explanation. I guessed that was the reason why that was the case.
Thankyou for the reply.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I also understand your frustration but I guess Pete explained quite well why this is necessary.
Quote: It is quite disheartening when the work put into creating an article is not able to be recognised by colleagues.
Why do you and you colleages not vote from your/their home computers to show the appreciation for the work done? Or alternatively from the smartphone (as long as you're not using the same wlan ) (Yeah, not the easiest way but it would be a start)
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
