|
You are correct, I forgot about the special cases.
|
|
|
|
|
#include <iostream>
void myfn(int **date, size_t len)
{
for(size_t i = 0; i < len; ++i)
*data[i] = 1 * 2;
}
I can't see to replicate the issue.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Contrary to articles and tricks, it is impossible to leave a comment on a moderated blog entry.
There is a blog entry with a typo in the title itself; I flagged with a format issue, but cannot explain why to the author.
"Five fruits and vegetables a day? What a joke!
Personally, after the third watermelon, I'm full."
|
|
|
|
|
Problem is not new and they already know it, but I suppose that either it got down in the priority list or it is nastier than it looks and couldn't be solved yet.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I have been notified about a message that I supposed got deleted by the user himself, because there is nothing to find. I have the email notification so I know it is spam, but I can't find the user. I suppose he has got no other messages yet, so he can't be found searching by [Author: "24/7docs"]
Is there a way to directly search a user profile? I don't want to go to the "who is who" and navigate over thousands of pages to try to find him. I suppose he is relative new as most spammers, but is not the same to go through all newcomers of the day than to search for a specific one that might be one or two weeks old.
If no direct "user search" I think it could be a nice functionality for the S&A group.
Example: search for "*keto*", for "*baba*", for "*support*"... the usual suspects.
EDIT: Possible alternative: Link to the user profile in the notification? It already gives the link to reply to the concrete message. It could give the possibility to visit the profile of the author.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 27-Mar-20 4:44am.
|
|
|
|
|
If you have the member's name from the email notification, you should be able to create the URL to their home page. For example I just added your name to https://www.codeproject.com/Members/ to get to your homepage: Nelek - Professional Profile[^].
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry but no...
It doesn't work as you expect. The URL is to be completed with the "@" Nick (the summon one) and it doesn't necessarily is the same as the one being displayed. I mean to get to you, we need:
https://www.codeproject.com/Members/Richard-MacCutchan - Richard MacCutchan - Professional Profile[^]
Trying:
https://www.codeproject.com/Members/Richard%20MacCutchan doesn't find you: CodeProject[^]
Displayed Username is or was "24/7docs", directly adding it:
24 - Professional Profile[^]
Not matching. The user "24" is older than me, and no evidence of a change of nick.
Encoding the "/" manually:
trying "24%2F7Docs" brings me to the user "24" above
and
trying "24/7docs" brings me to "Unable to load the requested member's information."
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 27-Mar-20 7:42am.
|
|
|
|
|
This doesn't work like that unfortunately. For example, my nick shortcut is User-890501 (I tried to change this several times but never succeeded).
"Five fruits and vegetables a day? What a joke!
Personally, after the third watermelon, I'm full."
|
|
|
|
|
We removed the ability to search for specific users because (a) it was being abused, and (b) it was a big load on the servers to do partial text matches in SQL (obviously there are way better ways to do this but since we decided to not do it in the first place we didn't proceed with the better way)
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Ok.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
No to worry. The account was closed, so nothing to search for.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the information
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Is this broken or on the to-do list? I can't believe it's never come up.
Anyway, the author should be notified when someone starts a new thread on the article's discussion board. You get notified of replies, the same as elsewhere, but not the initial post.
|
|
|
|
|
All articles should provide notifications. If not, go to the article and check the 'Email Alerts' popup at the top of the forum and ensure you have some options selected.
Overnight one of our cache servers seems to have suffered a mishap. We're working on it now but no ETA at the moment. This is definitely impacting things a little.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Normally deleted / nuked items are visible for protectors, but I can't see anything.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I just made an answer to a QA question. Right after posting it, I click on the "All Questions" widget, which brings me back to the questions page, but also sets the filter to a bunch of tags, all of them related to VB (the question was tagged C#).
Then I clean the filter, click "Update", which brings me to the Lounge 
When I go back to QA, this time the filter has been automatically set to anything c# relative. Second cleaning of the filter, update => this time it's ok, I stay on the QA forum and the filter has been cleared.
Weird 
"Five fruits and vegetables a day? What a joke!
Personally, after the third watermelon, I'm full."
|
|
|
|
|
If a message gets closed due to spam... and you edit one of the direct answers, you can still see the content of the closed message.
Is that desired so?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
How else could you find the phone numbers for Delhi escort services?
|
|
|
|
|
Not funny, not funny at all.
|
|
|
|
|
I think the question is more, why one should have the possibility to edit an answer... Either block/delete, but sorry _not edit_, not even by an admin.
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Example: I have edited some messages because they had the spam link of the closed message in the subject, and deleting the rest of the messages in the thread was not needed.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, maybe I don't get the point. I think you recgonized meanwhile my limited opportunity to communicate in english
Nevertheless in my opinion the messages containing spam links (what else) should be blocked/deleted by you and not modified by anybbody,
Only my view, and never against you and any other protector.
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
0x01AA wrote: the messages containing spam links (what else) should be blocked/deleted by you and not modified by anybbody,
The spam message had the spam link in the subject. Mark Wallace (here[^]) and Phil.o (here[^]) changed the subject and that was the correct action.
The rest of the people writing a message in that thread were spreading the spam link in the subject, even OriginalGriff (who should know better).
So, I edited the messages to delete the spam link in the subject (original spam and user were already nuked), instead of deleting the whole thread.
I hope you understood it now.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
