Bugs and Suggestions

24-Dec-11 23:14

How about having a bounty system in Quick Answers section.
Like what stack overflow already have :
http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/16065/how-does-the-bounty-system-work[^]

I think it helps to make those parts more competitive.

#realJSOP25-Dec-11 3:45

#realJSOP

25-Dec-11 3:45

I don't see the point(s). Besides, we don't want to be like StackOverflow.

".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997

Amir Mahfoozi25-Dec-11 4:40

25-Dec-11 4:40

I thought that when we have some people who forget that we have answered to their questions so how about having some people who want to transfer their scores in place of having their questions answered well.
Think of a person who is prepared to give you +500 score from his scores Big Grin | :-D

It's very tempting Wink | ;)

And it was just a proposal and in the world of companies competitions, it's not an unusual happening that a company try to offer something that already another company offered to people.
For example Yahoo provided free mail service to its users and Google proposed it to its users. Then Google provided a lot of space for free and Yahoo did too, to not be left behind.

Slacker00726-Dec-11 23:48

Slacker007

26-Dec-11 23:48

This is not Burger King. You can't have it your way.

Besides, they use a lot of filler and additives down the street at Stack Overblow and it always leaves you wanting more.

Chris Maunder3-Jan-12 5:59

Chris Maunder

3-Jan-12 5:59

It's an interesting idea but not on our list at the moment.

cheers,
Chris Maunder

The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP

Amir Mahfoozi3-Jan-12 17:44

3-Jan-12 17:44

Hi Chris,

Thanks for your kind attention Smile | :)

Regards.

Cancelling a post.

Henry Minute23-Dec-11 23:51

Henry Minute

23-Dec-11 23:51

Currently when cancelling a post a confirmation dialog is shown

"Are you sure you wish to cancel?"

(or something close to that)

This has 'OK' and 'Cancel' buttons. Would it not be better if these were 'Yes' and 'No'.

Henry Minute

Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain
Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?"
“I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
I wouldn't let CG touch my Abacus!
When you're wrestling a gorilla, you don't stop when you're tired, you stop when the gorilla is.

Luc Pattyn24-Dec-11 2:27

Luc Pattyn

24-Dec-11 2:27

yes I want to cancel the cancellation I asked for by clicking the cancel button??

and no, I don't need an "are you sure..." dialog when cancelling out of an edit message attempt when I didn't modify the message at all.

Smile | :)

Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum

Henry Minute24-Dec-11 7:52

Henry Minute

24-Dec-11 7:52

Luc Pattyn wrote:
yes I want to cancel the cancellation I asked for by clicking the cancel button??

I keep doing that and finally got fed up enough to make the suggestion.

Chris Maunder24-Dec-11 9:52

Chris Maunder

24-Dec-11 9:52

We're using the built-in javascript confirmation dialog that, alas, has no options to change the names of the buttons. The only option is to replace the confirmation dialog with a custom dialog using jQuery UI or something.Not difficult, but not, unfortunately, high on the priority list unless it's really, really bugging you or actively causing you stomach cramps.

cheers,
Chris Maunder

The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP

Henry Minute24-Dec-11 11:37

Henry Minute

24-Dec-11 11:37

Add it to the list if you would.

Stefan_Lang3-Jan-12 5:17

Stefan_Lang

3-Jan-12 5:17

'Are you sure?' dialogs are overused. Just skip it!

Slacker00726-Dec-11 23:45

Slacker007

26-Dec-11 23:45

Henry Minute wrote:
Would it not be better if these were 'Yes' and 'No'.

What about the obligatory "abort" and "retry"?

Q&A question won't open

Wendelius23-Dec-11 5:00

Wendelius

23-Dec-11 5:00

For some reason this question won't open at all. How to retreive data from the database to the second table after selecting the user in the first table?[^]

The need to optimize rises from a bad design.My articles[^]

Amir Mahfoozi24-Dec-11 23:23

24-Dec-11 23:23

It seems that someone went to edit it and the system have forgotten to cancel his ticket for editing.

Because the ticket error is given whenever someone requests to edit a post and at the same time another person is busy with editing that post.

OriginalGriff25-Dec-11 1:14

OriginalGriff

25-Dec-11 1:14

Probably not - when a question is being edited, you can still read teh currect content: you just get a message at teh bottom of the question saying "this question is locked for editing by ANOtherUser"

This question will not open at all, and seems to be a database problem, or a major HTML error in the question itself.

Ideological Purity is no substitute for being able to stick your thumb down a pipe to stop the water

Amir Mahfoozi25-Dec-11 1:40

25-Dec-11 1:40

Oh yes!

I didn't pay attention that it should show the question even when someone edits it.

Chris Maunder3-Jan-12 6:11

Chris Maunder

3-Jan-12 6:11

An interesting bug.

We were using

Regex.Replace(result, @"(\&nbsp\;|\s)*(\<\/.*\>)?(\&nbsp\;|\s)*$", "$2");

to trim the HTML string. The reg ex was timing out. A small changed solved the issue:

Regex.Replace(result, @"(\&nbsp\;|\s)*(\<\/.*\>)?(\&nbsp\;|\s)*$", "$2",
                      RegexOptions.Multiline | RegexOptions.IgnoreCase);

The new code will be released after lunch.

cheers,
Chris Maunder

The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP