|
I published a blog [Article:5330058]. After a few hours, when I try to see it, I get an error message.
it says:
Quote: Ticket:
Error: An error occurred in this page. The error has been recorded and the site administrator informed.
Abort, Retry, Fail?_
So, kindly help me out!
|
|
|
|
|
You posted a plagiarised article[^], which is not tolerated here. Your article was deleted, and your account will probably be closed soon.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Deeming wrote: your account will probably be closed soon.
Done.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
In my article RLE: The Human Friendly Compression[^]
This afternoon, I got a vote, since all votes are 5 stars, I deduce it was an upvote.
But my reputation log says it was a downvote and removed 40 points 
Is it normal ?
Is there a sequence like clicking 1 star, then clicking 5 stars leading to a downvote in reputation and an upvote in article ?
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
modified 18-Apr-22 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
That's an interesting one!
Hover over the dropdown on the rating control and you'll see there are 8 votes of 5. However, you have 10 votes overall. 2 votes are 2/5 and, because they fall too far outside of the voting trend, have been discounted. If a high level member votes 2, or you get another few 2's, all the 2's will kick in and you'll see a drop in the rating.
The question is: why are those missing 2 votes not being shown greyed out? I'll add this to the list.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for explanation.
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
I just published a new version of my article, and something fail to enforce the standard width.
Was OK with previous version of article.
RLE: The Human Friendly Compression[^]
Using old FireFox 56.
Looks OK with Chrome.
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
Looks OK in FireFox 99.
Probably an issue with the old version of FF.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
The Lounge
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes in very specific circumstances. I'll leave that as an exercise for the reader.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
I wish I could see the original HTML. It's interesting that it's happened in both PRE blocks and straight HTML. Our HTML sanitiser is pretty good at dealing with that (it deals with it everyday).
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
:facepalm:
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
modified 11-Apr-22 1:17am.
|
|
|
|
|
I cut and pasted, I added HTML I thought would break it, but I couldn't (at least in our test rig) break it.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
It would appear that < followed by a space is OK, but followed by any character is not.
This for (int i = 1; i < n; ++i) will not break it:
for (int i = 1; i < n; ++i)
This for (int i = 1; i <n; ++i)will (as you can see):
for (int i = 1; i
|
|
|
|
|
Well done.
(int i = 1; i <n ;="" ++i)
<="" div="">
It looks like it's a regression. We'll add it to the TODO
...or just switch to markdown... 
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: ...or just switch to markdown...
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like this especially happens after a post. Still only experience and no proper way to reproduce.
Chrome: Version 100.0.4896.75
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, and thank you. I will be trying to track that one down tomorrow.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris,
Just wanted to let you know that this seems to be fixed. I could reproduce it 100% of the time. Last week, whatever change you made fixed the overlapping on my end.
|
|
|
|
|
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I tried asking a question in Q&A. When I clicked Submit, it told me there was a problem with my keywords. I fixed the problem and clicked Submit again.
I was then informed I was "posting too often" and to "hold on there tiger".
Really?
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Occasionally I'm told that there was a problem when posting something, only to discover that it got posted anyway. Might that explain it?
|
|
|
|
|
Are you upset that
a) I called you tiger,
b) our system thought, I'm guessing erroneously, that you were posting too frequently, or
c) that we had had to implement posting throttling because of spammers causing havoc and messing up life for everyone
What approximate time was was this, and how many posts had you made (roughly)?
Out of curiosity what was the problem with the keywords? Too many? An error when the system tried to process them?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: our system thought, I'm guessing erroneously, that you were posting too frequently
Based on the error message about the keywords, I assumed the post had failed. I corrected the issue and tried to submit the question again. That's when I got the 'tiger' message.
It turns out the question actually posted: Has anyone written a windows 11 shell extension?[^]
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
