|
Either the sort has lost its marbles, or the time stamps are fiction.
Multiple Web0*, all release dated today.
Not a biggie.
Cheers,
Peter
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
...finally I am no longer worried about the 4.97 just because one out of twenty has assigned a 4 instead of 5 
|
|
|
|
|
You can start worrying about that 4/5 again
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I think there need to have some sort of captcha or something to prevent replay attack on the registration page[^] . I'm able to register at least 5 users [start with Soyabean] using Fiddler, just modify my username then submit. I'm sure someone out there already been exploring this vulnerability by registering many accounts. Please look into it.
Some Example:
Are these username generated by the system[^]
@Chris-Maunder
@Sean-Ewington
Bryian Tan
modified 27-Apr-19 15:14pm.
|
|
|
|
|
There is a hyphen in Chris-Maunder if you want to attract his attention.
But ... it shouldn't be necessary here, I think he gets automatically notified of any new threads here; certainly, he checks here regularly.
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks . look like the adversary already injected thousands of fake account into the system already (that my speculation).
Bryian Tan
|
|
|
|
|
Which is odd, because the names are more distinctive of spam than the default "Member nnnnnnnn", but easy to find as a "bloc" because the MID's still stay pretty much contiguous. And I'd trust "Member nnnnnnnn" slightly more than "gdfsrysdeax" or similar ... 
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I've hunted around for this for a bit and can't find it. Not sure if it doesn't exist or I'm just not looking at the right spot.
I'd like to periodically be able to get a report of how many views my articles get. I can see to total views since an article was written, but I can't see how to view how many views this year, or the last 90 days.
If this doesn't already exist, could it?
|
|
|
|
|
Hover the mouse over your username at the top right of the page, and a drop down will appear.
Select "My Articles" from the list for the articles page.
Each article has a "views" count visible:
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
But something seems to be disappear: If I go to my Tip/Trick it shows on the left side "Stats" and there "views". In the past it was possible to click on "views" and it showed a time graph over the views. This is no longer possible at the moment.
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
They are there for me (now you point me at them):
 All I did was open the article, and click on "stats".
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
 you are right. I searched in the "Stats" where "views" and "bookmark" are shown. The "Stats" in the very top works like you described.
Thank you very much.
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
No, thank you - I didn't even know it existed!
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
After @OriginalGriff refreshed my brain. This is maybe what you are looking for:
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
This is nearly what I'm looking for. I'd like to be able to control the date range that gets reported (currently just shows last 30 days), and I'd like the out put either to be just the total or grid.
It would be really nice to be able to put in a date range and get a total of how many views each article had over that range all on one page.
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure, but maybe you will find something here: https://api.codeproject.com/ [^]
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Looked promising, but it doesn't have any information about views.
|
|
|
|
|
This would be article: test[^] brings up an alert box. Looks like he's been trying for a while to get it working: Malicious project ("test", mrbaslote)[^]
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I suggest to remove this testlink. Everyone can click it and see how one can do something like this in the html source.
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Needs to be there so Chris and the Hamsters can tell which it is and work out a generic way to block it - either they or I will remove it when they are solid.
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, you are the boss. I thought only it should be less public, that not every potential abuser can benefit from this "basic research" presented in the test link.
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
But if it is not active or in the same way the abusers managed to bring it in, then it might be more difficult to find a solution.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
@Mentors and @Editors, I just saw this article in moderation, under moderation right now, and it has some code hosted on GitHub as gists. Do we accept that, or we need to suggest an on-site code?
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
AFAIK is allowed, there are a lot of publications hosting code in github
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
For big projects already involving the open-source community, this is more convenient than forcing to maintain two separate code bases.
noop()
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
