|
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
instead one 1-5 vote, a simple 'Yeah Baby' symbol, the more you get the bigger the icon.
Gives you something to aim for.
------------------------------------
"I'm going to walk around a field dangling my keys on a bit of string until I hear whistling noises. "
Steve Harris 2009
|
|
|
|
|
Dalek Dave wrote: the more you get the bigger the icon.
Then we could go around trying to see which one of us had the biggest one???
Jon
'When once a republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of remedying any of the growing evils but by removing the corruption and restoring its lost principles; every other correction is either useless or a new evil.' ~ Montesquieu
Soap Box 1.0: the first, the original, reborn troll-less
|
|
|
|
|
So, my fairy godmother told me that I could either have a massive schlong or a fantastic memory. I forget what I chose.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
|
I could do the 'Good post/bad post' thing, but voting 5 without a 1 is like a northpole without a south.
And science hasn't yet detected monopoles so I'm not even sure if it's possible.
Ya can't mess with physics.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Sad, sad. You need to study General Semantics and escape from your Aristotelian view of the universe. But I forgive you.
Jon
'When once a republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of remedying any of the growing evils but by removing the corruption and restoring its lost principles; every other correction is either useless or a new evil.' ~ Montesquieu
Soap Box 1.0: the first, the original, reborn troll-less
|
|
|
|
|
It's interesting that you characterize 5 as being a positive thing, and yet your characterization of 1 is very emotional.
Personally, I think of 5 as "strongly agree", and 1 as "strongly disagree". If I see a post I don't agree with, and a lot of 5 votes, I want to be able to indicate that I don't agree (strongly).
If 1 really has the connotation you indicate, maybe we should have a button with the graphic symbol for "steaming pile of manure", which would function like a 0 or maybe even -1, with an added dose of utter revulsion and disdain, but falling short of "take this pos post off the forum". 
|
|
|
|
|
Hans Dietrich wrote: t's interesting that you characterize 5 as being a positive thing, and yet your characterization of 1 is very emotional.
My dear boy, you have no idea how emotional I can get. 
Hans Dietrich wrote: If 1 really has the connotation you indicate, maybe we should have a button with the graphic symbol for "steaming pile of manure",
You must have been oblivious to the 1-wars that caused the end of Soapbox-the-original. Good for you for staying so far above the fray.
Jon
'When once a republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of remedying any of the growing evils but by removing the corruption and restoring its lost principles; every other correction is either useless or a new evil.' ~ Montesquieu
Soap Box 1.0: the first, the original, reborn troll-less
|
|
|
|
|
about votes of 1 by "haters", I remember I received votes of 1 in all my articles in a single day. Is there a way to detect this?
Best regards,
Jaime.
|
|
|
|
|
Jaime Olivares wrote: about votes of 1 by "haters", I remember I received votes of 1 in all my articles in a single day. Is there a way to detect this?
IIRC, Chris indicated that there was. I once thought of suggesting that the highest and lowest vote be eliminated, but realised that was just an invitation to the children to create additional logins.
Jon
'When once a republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of remedying any of the growing evils but by removing the corruption and restoring its lost principles; every other correction is either useless or a new evil.' ~ Montesquieu
Soap Box 1.0: the first, the original, reborn troll-less
|
|
|
|
|
I think keyboard navigation in the forum will be useful. I think about something similar with the navigation in Google Reader which uses the same key mappings like vim: j - down, k - up.
If you can't explain something to a six year old, you really don't understand it yourself. (Albert Einstein)
|
|
|
|
|
Already exists:
try:
ctrl + up arrow / down arrow / left arrow / right arrow
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, but anyways vim-like key bindings will be nice.
If you can't explain something to a six year old, you really don't understand it yourself. (Albert Einstein)
|
|
|
|
|
Can I suggest VMware's awesome idea?
http://www.mustafacodes.net/downloads/vmware-tag.png[^]
Cool, eh? 
If you can't understand the cropped image, what's happening is that the user, once he/she completes their post, just before they click post, they can set their tags, manually, or, and this is the cool part, they can choose tags that already exist (based on popularity).
No no, don't thank me, I love this place 
If the post was helpful, please vote, eh!
Current activities:
Book: Devils by Fyodor Dostoyevsky
Project: Hospital Automation, final stage
Learning: Image analysis, LINQ
Now and forever, defiant to the end.
What is Multiple Sclerosis[ ^]?
|
|
|
|
|
Actually we're working on exactly this. The soon-to-be-finalised Quick Answers uses a tagging system that is limited to our current batch of attributes, but it's increasingly obvious that free-form tagging is the only real path forward in this.
Now - surely we can at least send you a couple of bags of gold or a bevy of nubile virgins or something to say thank you for your trouble...
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: Actually we're working on exactly this. The soon-to-be-finalised Quick Answers uses a tagging system that is limited to our current batch of attributes, but it's increasingly obvious that free-form tagging is the only real path forward in this.
Excellent! 
Chris Maunder wrote: Now - surely we can at least send you a couple of bags of gold or a bevy of nubile virgins or something to say thank you for your trouble...
No, no, no need! Honest! What, you insist? Well, if you feel that you must, I'll accept a donut and a coffee if I make it to CP premises. Oh oh! And a tour of the hamster cages!!!
If the post was helpful, please vote, eh!
Current activities:
Book: Devils by Fyodor Dostoyevsky
Project: Hospital Automation, final stage
Learning: Image analysis, LINQ
Now and forever, defiant to the end.
What is Multiple Sclerosis[ ^]?
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: Now - surely we can at least send you a couple of bags of gold or a bevy of nubile virgins or something to say thank you for your trouble...
Man, I can't stop laughing since I read that
If the post was helpful, please vote, eh!
Current activities:
Book: Devils by Fyodor Dostoyevsky
Project: Hospital Automation, final stage
Learning: Image analysis, LINQ
Now and forever, defiant to the end.
What is Multiple Sclerosis[ ^]?
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmm...I would have used StackOverflow as the example for this, they've been rocking that feature since day one.
"Creating your own blog is about as easy as creating your own urine, and you're about as likely to find someone else interested in it." -- Lore Sjöberg
|
|
|
|
|
CP Team,
For an article after casting a vote of particular weight (giving appropriate reason), when I was trying to exercise the option of readjusting the vote weight it is displaying the following message:
You voted 2 for this article. Revote?
But even after that it is proceeding with a mandatory reason for vote. This reason-demand might not be suitable for revote right?
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage
Tech Gossips
The woods are lovely, dark and deep,
But I have promises to keep,
And miles to go before I sleep,
And miles to go before I sleep!
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks - added to the bug list
Hang on - I don't think I fully understand.
When you low vote you must provide a comment. If you wish to revote, and revote low, then yes, you will still be required to provide a comment. If you are changing from 1 to 2, say, then you've changed your mind on something and the author should be told.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I fully agree.
Luc Pattyn
I only read code that is properly indented, and rendered in a non-proportional font; hint: use PRE tags in forum messages
Local announcement (Antwerp region): Lange Wapper? Neen!
|
|
|
|
|
at the bottom of the page
correction. Was displaying a blank.
Jon
'When once a republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of remedying any of the growing evils but by removing the corruption and restoring its lost principles; every other correction is either useless or a new evil.' ~ Montesquieu
Soap Box 1.0: the first, the original, reborn troll-less
|
|
|
|
|
We're seeing it in a couple of places sporadically.
An odd one. We're trying to work it out at the moment.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
When an article is still unedited, there is a "Modify" link in the upper right corner. But when article is already edited, this hyperlink disappears and you have to send a mail by yourself to submit@codeproject.com whithout any facility provided by codeproject.
I think the link should keep and lead to another page with specific instructions and a button to open a new mail window with target address, subject and basic body info including article's title, author and url.
Best regards,
Jaime.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm sorry, but this sounds way too logical. Are you an engineer?
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
