C / C++ / MFC

Re: Who has the file opened?

23-Oct-09 9:33

Are you looking for a seriously advanced one (see this thread), or just one to handle 4-5 basic operators? The latter cab be done via a basic RPN calculator.

"Old age is like a bank account. You withdraw later in life what you have deposited along the way." - Unknown

"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons

Who has the file opened?

Peter Weyzen23-Oct-09 9:11

Peter Weyzen

23-Oct-09 9:11

How terrible is it to find out what application has a particular file open?

Clues?

-peter

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<br />
Peter Weyzen<br />
Staff Engineer<br />
<a href="http://www.soonr.com">SoonR Inc -- PC Power delivered to your phone</a>

David Crow23-Oct-09 9:34

Re: Who has the file opened?

23-Oct-09 9:34

Via code?

Peter Weyzen23-Oct-09 10:19

Peter Weyzen

23-Oct-09 10:19

Absolutely!

I'd love to display status information in my app about why I am having trouble backing up a file.
"File in use by Microsoft Word"

I could of course "guess using the file associations", but it would be cooler to know the actual application using the file.

-peter

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<br />
Peter Weyzen<br />
Staff Engineer<br />
<a href="http://www.soonr.com">SoonR Inc -- PC Power delivered to your phone</a>

Re: Who has the file opened?

David Crow23-Oct-09 10:22

Property Sheet OnOK only calls property page1 OnOK override? [modified]

23-Oct-09 10:22

Peter Weyzen wrote:
Absolutely!

Several utilities made by SysInternals do this, but they work in conjunction with a file-system driver. Many years ago, there used to be a "How does it work?" blurb on their Web site. I think it was removed even before Microsoft bought them.

al250023-Oct-09 8:19

Re: Property Sheet OnOK only calls property page1 OnOK override?

23-Oct-09 8:19

Hi,

Saw a lot of posts related to this but still not totally clear -

It appears that even if you override OnOK for all property pages only the first page(1) OnOK override is called. The others are never called even if the user hits OK when page 2-n is active.

Does this means it is difficult to perform additional OnOK processing of the data on pages 2-n when the user dismisses the sheet?

Thanks

modified on Friday, October 23, 2009 2:34 PM

al250023-Oct-09 9:26

Re: Property Sheet OnOK only calls property page1 OnOK override?

23-Oct-09 9:26

Found the following via google-

Hacking the CPropertySheet[^]

David Crow23-Oct-09 9:51

Re: Property Sheet OnOK only calls property page1 OnOK override?

23-Oct-09 9:51

al2500 wrote:
The others are never called even if the user hits OK when page 2-n is active.

With a very basic app created, I found this to not be true. Each page's OnOK() method was indeed called.

al250023-Oct-09 11:56

Re: Property Sheet OnOK only calls property page1 OnOK override?

23-Oct-09 11:56

But normally you would need any modified page's OnOK called since the user may modify more than one or close from a different page.

Regardless, I think the best method (for me) is as follows (found it in a post here):

Add afx_msg void OnOK(); to the property sheet definition

Add ON_COMMAND(IDOK, OnOK) and

void CMyPropSheet::OnOK()
{
AfxMessageBox("Hello World");
CPropertySheet::EndDialog(IDOK);

}

to the implementation. Then you have access to data memebers of all pages.

David Crow23-Oct-09 14:52

Re: Property Sheet OnOK only calls property page1 OnOK override?

23-Oct-09 14:52

al2500 wrote:
But normally you would need any modified page's OnOK called...

Which is exactly what happens, plus the pages that were not selected (i.e., no modifications).

al250023-Oct-09 18:35

C++ troubles with basic openMP code.

23-Oct-09 18:35

David,

Thanks for your help - I see now that it calls OnOK (using afx_msg void OnOK()) for any pages that were viewed and I initially expected all pages to call OnOk regardless so I did not "view" them when testing...

However, I have verified that it only calls OnOK for pages that were viewed. This is OK with me but it might be good to understand why your behavior is different.

My code is -

For each page definition-

afx_msg void OnOK();

For each implementation -

ON_COMMAND(IDOK, OnOK)

void CPageN::OnOK()
{
AfxMessageBox("PageN");
CPropertyPage::OnOK();

}

Again, thanks for the help. It's actually much cleaner to perform any data validation/storage in the page implementation vs. the sheet implementation.

Andre_E_S23-Oct-09 6:41

Andre_E_S

23-Oct-09 6:41

Messing around trying to learn something and I'm having trouble seeing the time benefits in my openMP example.
Each array (pArray1 and pArray2) hold about 10meg of RGB bitmap data, bufferSize2 is the bmp file size. OpenMP is enabled in VS.

So I can run the following with or without #pragma and get the same 20Msec's or there about.

<br />
<br />
#pragma omp parallel for         //<-no impact on time<br />
  for(long loop=0;loop<bufferSize2;loop++)<br />
   pArrayResult[loop]= ~(pArray1[loop] - pArray2[loop]);<br />
<br />

I can try the common openMP example:

<br />
#pragma omp parallel<br />
{<br />
printf("hello world");<br />
}<br />

and never get something that looks like the example warning
helhelloo w world orld
I always get
hello world hello world

I can try

<br />
  #pragma omp parallel<br />
{ <br />
	int ID=omp_get_thread_num();<br />
        printf("Hello(%d)",ID);<br />
	printf("world(%d)",ID);<br />
}<br />

and the result is always sequential
hello(0)world(0) hello(1) world(1)

Anyone have an idea as to why everything seems sequential? What am I doing wrong?
Thanks,
Andre

Re: C++ troubles with basic openMP code.

David Crow23-Oct-09 7:06

Re: C++ troubles with basic openMP code.

23-Oct-09 7:06

A common misconception about multi-threaded programs is that they produce faster code. This can only be true if you have more than one processor. Otherwise, the context switches will actually make your code slower. Multi-threaded programs do make some problems easier to solve, however.

Andre_E_S23-Oct-09 8:25

Andre_E_S

23-Oct-09 8:25

Sorry for not being clearer... As the beginning of my post suggest I'm working on two 10 meg arrays. I "think" I was careful in how I split the work with respect to memory as well. I thought that workload would be perfect for the openMP test. And strangely enough I was sure to run it on a dual-core machine.

Thanks,
Andre

Unicode and Rich Edit Control

Software200723-Oct-09 5:47

Software2007

23-Oct-09 5:47

In my non-Unicode application, If I put in Chinese Text into a Rich Edit Control, it displays the chinese characters fine. I was wondering how would I be able to read that variable into a string that would hold the chinese Text, Can I somehow read that into binary? or am I going about this the wrong way to be able to read and write chinese Text in non-unicode app?

Michael Schubert23-Oct-09 6:47

Michael Schubert

23-Oct-09 6:47

Did you try any of the suggestions you got when you asked yesterday? Do you read the Chinese text from a file? If so, what encoding is it?

Anyway, for multibyte/UTF-8/UTF-16 conversions I recommend this class:
CStdioFile-derived class for multibyte and Unicode reading and writing[^]

Software200723-Oct-09 7:13

Software2007

23-Oct-09 7:13

Hi,
(Traditional, Big 5)
I have one simple program with a dialog and Edit field that I would like to enter chinese Text (like Customer Address). Usually I Serailize this field, and I read it from a different application thru the Serialize() function and display it. CString is what I use for that variable, but I know it doesn't work with chinese characters.

Nemanja Trifunovic23-Oct-09 8:30

Nemanja Trifunovic

23-Oct-09 8:30

Software2007 wrote:
CString is what I use for that variable, but I know it doesn't work with chinese characters

CString (on a non-Unicode build) should work just fine with the Big 5 encoding (Code page 950).

If I understand your requirements correctly, you could read the text from the rich edit control as Unicode (see EM_STREAMOUT[^] and then convert it back to CP 950 with WideCharToMultiByte[^] function.

utf8-cpp

Software200723-Oct-09 8:53

Software2007

23-Oct-09 8:53

I cannot type in Chinese Text into the regular Edit field to begin with, it displays ???? instead.
But if I use RichEdit control, I guess, I would be able to put in Chinese text, but I am not sure how to hold it in strings to serialize it, then when I read it back thru Serialize again it would turn back into chinese.