|
My best guess is:
1. the old status is still used in lots of places (it sure still is mentioned all around);
2. everyone's old status value has vanished.
I do not understand how that is possible.
|
|
|
|
|
This looks like it is blocking article publishing entirely.
|
|
|
|
|
| No cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
A wee upgrade featurette there mate?"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
|
I've noticed that I can't view pending articles either. What are the criteria that I should aim for?
|
|
|
|
|
It should be fixed. I can see them..45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
I am still not 
Looks like the permission relaxation for this feature is still out of my reach.
What is the minimum reputation needed, any idea?
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know anymore, and I haven't seen the requirements posted anywhere (doesn't mean they're not posted, just means I haven't seen them if they are)..45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: I haven't seen the requirements posted anywhere (doesn't mean they're not posted, just means I haven't seen them if they are).
Nicely put! 
Might be, someone else has an idea and tells us then!
|
|
|
|
|
No, my homepage is completely devoid of anything to do with article approvals. It seems that the criteria have been made more stringent in that respect
|
|
|
|
|
The criteria is for Gold authors, not just gold 'anything'. We did this so that someone who is, say, a gold partipant (a big chatter box!) but has no expertise in articles will not be able to moderate content.
We tried to juggle the numbers a little to ensure most people who were gold continued to be gold as authors, but in the end a few (including your unfortunate self) missed out. You're close - just not quite there.cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Got it 
Hope to get that priviledge soon then!
|
|
|
|
|
| So how does that fit with those of us who have already been enrolled in the Mentors group, even though we did not have the correct author ranking? txtspeak is the realm of 9 year old children, not developers. Christian Graus
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: So how does that fit with those of us who have already been enrolled in the Mentors group
It will fit.
I am grabbing a crowbar (tyirelever in some parts of the world) and will make it fit.cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
The memebership status is now showing various reputation types with their membership levels - which is very cool.
Taking cue from the suggestion posted just below , I was just wondering if points could be displayed along with their reputation types in the Professional Profile (at least when you hover the tooltip over the various types)?Me, I'm dishonest. And a dishonest man you can always trust to be dishonest.
Honestly. It's the honest ones you want to watch out for...
|
modified on Saturday, March 13, 2010 6:53 AM
|
|
|
|
|
There is already something useful on hover of the reputations of individuals Profession Profile.
|
|
|
|
|
Sandeep Mewara wrote: There is already something useful on hover of the reputations of individuals Profession Profile.
Yes, I noticed that. But then, there can always be more information inside the tooltip.Me, I'm dishonest. And a dishonest man you can always trust to be dishonest.
Honestly. It's the honest ones you want to watch out for...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yep! it can be... its just that adding points too with a little detail might make the tooltip a little big which looks annoying to lots of people!
Still, can be thought of in compact manner somehow.
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like Chris read, agreed and resolved a solution based on what we both said.
Cheers Chris!
Though i wanted to share a little on the look of the implementation.
Might be a little smaller font-sizes would look much better on the page (this is based on normal style and smaller font stuff on the same page)
|
|
|
|
|
Sandeep Mewara wrote: Looks like Chris read, agreed and resolved a solution based on what we both said.
That was really really quick. I wish things in the real world had such quick turnarounds.
Awesome, Chris.
Me, I'm dishonest. And a dishonest man you can always trust to be dishonest.
Honestly. It's the honest ones you want to watch out for...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is it possible if the Reputation FAQ can be modified to show your current points in the "Member Levels by Reputation Type" table at the bottom of the FAQ.
e.g. in the Author Header put members current Author points. Saves having to go back and forth to the chart to remember numbers or take a note of them.
Cheers,
|
|
|
|
|
I disagree...
daveauld wrote: Is it possible if the Reputation FAQ can be modified to show your current points in the "Member Levels by Reputation Type" table at the bottom of the FAQ.
I don't think this is a good idea. FAQ's are the places where one should see what everyone see. Answers are provided to common questions.
What you are suggesting will no longer keep that FAQ as a common page and will be like a part of 'About my reputation'! and we should have a static FAQ!
daveauld wrote: Saves having to go back and forth to the chart to remember numbers or take a note of them.
One can open two windows and have a look at them simultaneously!
|
|
|
|
|
Who says a FAQ cannot be dynamic? That is bollocks, but you are entitled to you opinion as am I.
Why inconvenience the user with having 2 windows, when you have space and couple of lines of extras code to get the system to do the work for you?
Also, i wonder what the Points Needed column will be used for in the future? maybe it is for something dynamic....only time will tell.Dave
Don't forget to rate messages!Find Me On: Web| Facebook| Twitter| LinkedInWaving? dave.m.auld[at]googlewave.com
modified on Saturday, March 13, 2010 7:02 AM
|
|
|
|
|
daveauld wrote: but you are entitled to you opinion as am I.
Right! That was just my opinion, nothing more!
daveauld wrote: Also, i wonder what the Points Needed column will be used for in the future? maybe it is for something dynamic....only time will tell
Yep. Lets see.
|
|
|
|
|
I think it's a great idea, since the the FAQ is on a separate page from your actual reputation score.
Just put the member's current score for each category in the table header that explains that category..45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
