|
In general it is small companies that allow you to be innovative, whether they are startups or not - simply because you can talk directly to the person who makes the decision and they understand what you are saying. The larger the company, the more layers of non-understanding you have to go through to get an idea started.
But innovation is not just about your output, to be truly innovative in terms of product needs a lot more than a good idea - it need a lot of money too. There are the costs of manufacture, marketing, advertising, sales - all of which are frequently tens or hundreds of times the development cost. This is where it takes a big company to back it and get it to the market.
I have seen quite a few good, innovative products that have got nowhere because the company concerned cannot afford to get it out there to teh attention of people. And quite a few that do very well, despite being completely useless. JML anyone?
Ideological Purity is no substitute for being able to stick your thumb down a pipe to stop the water
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: I have seen quite a few good, innovative products that have got nowhere because
the company concerned cannot afford to get it out there to teh attention of
people. And quite a few that do very well, despite being completely useless. JML
anyone?
The poll asks "Which type of organisation is the most innovative?" - of course small is better. If a product is created money is needed to go further - commercialisation. This can be IPO, Sell out, Partnership etc. Quite often this is where they fall - because they cannot take this step (or mess it up) - but that is another question.
Peter Wasser
|
|
|
|
|
I agree - but the list does not cover small (or medium sized) companies that have been going for a while.
Ideological Purity is no substitute for being able to stick your thumb down a pipe to stop the water
|
|
|
|
|
Do they exist?
Peter Wasser
|
|
|
|
|
Well there has to be some stage between "small startup" and "large commercial"...
Ideological Purity is no substitute for being able to stick your thumb down a pipe to stop the water
|
|
|
|
|
And yet few people have voted "other" it seems.
Peter Wasser
|
|
|
|
|
Because people don't vote for a penguin for President of the USA, doesn't mean they don't exist, either!
Ideological Purity is no substitute for being able to stick your thumb down a pipe to stop the water
|
|
|
|
|
..Small commercial Start-ups in most cases.
I have worked in big MNC's and never found it to be innovative, only big billing and comfort zone.
Also, worked at small IT inc as fresher and had good experience of learning, unlike Big Co's.
// ♫ 99 little bugs in the code,
// 99 bugs in the code
// We fix a bug, compile it again
// 101 little bugs in the code ♫
|
|
|
|
|
|
I completely agree with you. You dont get the right recognition for the work done if you are in a big organization but small organizations and startups do help you grow and help you learn a lot.
Ravi Sant wrote: only big billing and comfort zone
Completely agree. The company which i work is not at all an employees organization, i would say its the stake holders organization. People here only talk about money.
Every new day is another chance to change your life.
|
|
|
|
|
Problem is, you also want to get *paid* a lot. Perhaps I been around for a long time so getting paid sounds more important than *opportunity to learn* (hell any tech subjects I can find online learn on my own)
dev
|
|
|
|