|
|
I answered this question comparing variables in loops[^] and on seeing the other answer realized that I had misunderstood the question and so removed my answer.
I do see the addition of 10 points for given the answer, but these points were not deducted when I removed the answer as I believe they should have been.
I am not sure but I believe the statistic number of answers given (on the profile page) also did not decrease.
0100000101101110011001000111001011101001
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Just changed my email address, and I used to be member 572967, and now a new member id is assigned to me, 2667552. Is there a way for me to get back my old member id?
Thanks
Hanbo
|
|
|
|
|
572967[^] is still there, it looks like you have two ids. Get Chris to delete the one you do not want.
One of these days I'm going to think of a really clever signature.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is common unfortunately. These sites steal content, but Code Project is good at setting the lawyers on these sites.
|
|
|
|
|
We will contact them. That's uncool.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
The OP's article is dated Dec 17th. The article on the other site is dated Nov 6th. Of course it's trivial to set a past date for a blog entry. But just thought I'd bring this to your notice.
|
|
|
|
|
Looking at the article's revision history, it was originally published on Code Project on Oct. 11, 2012.
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, my mistake. With all this Metro re-design, I missed that. But I blame Chris for this. 
|
|
|
|
|
or you lose your bug capturing skill ? just kidding!!
Jibesh.V.P
India
|
|
|
|
|
jibesh wrote: or you lose your bug capturing skill ? just kidding!!
The "just kidding" was not needed - that was fairly obvious. 
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, I noticed that previously, Its my article.
|
|
|
|
|
AshishChaudha wrote:
Thanks, I noticed that previously, Its my
article.
Yeah, I didn't think otherwise.
|
|
|
|
|
I looked at the HTML on the 3rd party article and it sure looks like they copied the HTML off CP. And then used an older date to make it look like the OP stole the artcle off them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
My latest blog article was posted on 27 Nov 2012, but it was never listed in any of the newsletters that were sent after that. Is there any bug or wasn't it included for any reason? This is the article:
Improving LINQ code reusability: Select method[^]
Thanks in advance,
Rui
|
|
|
|
|
Yes. It allows me to report the same message twice if I press the refresh page. I think once I report the message It should be enabled for me to report again?
am I right?
Jibesh.V.P
India
|
|
|
|
|
You can report it twice, but only one is counted (as far as I know), you can change the reason of the report (i.e. spam-->repost).
If you report, when it is done, it appears a message with "X" reports (X is current number). That should stay the same.
Regards.
--------
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpfull answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
thats sounds Odd to me. why cant it show the history of my report status so that atleast i am aware that I already reported. Also if some one already reported a spam why would I need to report it again?
was it open it for any purpose?
Jibesh.V.P
India
|
|
|
|
|
As I said.
If you click the false option, you can correct it.
The purpose I see, is that CP-Staff can have better control on why a message was nuked or things like that.
On the other hand, it is not the same to report a message as "not a solution" or "unclear or incomplete" than reporting it as spam or abusive/troll.
So if you change your mind or you have a bad click, you can correct the reason, but the report it self stays no matter how oft you do it. You get only 1 event of reputation and it adds only 1 report to the count of that message/user.
If you don't want to report it twice... then don't do it.
Regards.
--------
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpfull answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I have answered one question a simple question about about "scanf"[^], for which I received 4 votes and they are displayed in the Reputation history page.
The answer is also accepted, but I guess the 25 Authority points are not added 
as there is no entry for that in the reputation history.
Can you please check what is the problem?
Thanks...
|
|
|
|
|
Why are you so obsessed by the points? You must be checking your points at an unhealthy rate.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: Why are you so obsessed by the points?
Sorry @Pete, but I am not obsessed. 
Actually I asked the question as I saw the green background and got confused "why this is not accepted?". 
|
|
|
|
|
No. Your question clearly asked about the points.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
