|
There's no best answer, each project has a especific order.
Missing
1. Usefullness
Paulo Gomes
Over and Out 
|
|
|
|
|
Reliability encompasses all the others except maybe performance, but I would think think a product without acceptable performance would be consider unreliable by most.
|
|
|
|
|
Hmm....
Life is all about share and care...
public class Life : ICareable,IShareable
{
// implements yours...
}
|
|
|
|
|
1. Reliability
2. Performance
3. Exception Handling
4. Security
5. Availability (not sure what your definition is here: platform support?)
If its buggy I don't care about most of the other stuff. If it is tight I am concerned about how fast it is and how well it handles typical exceptions.
If it runs well I am concerned about security and platform availability. If it is buggy how secure can it be anyway.
"Courtesy is the product of a mature, disciplined mind ... ridicule is lack of the same - DPM"
|
|
|
|
|
Well said... 
Life is all about share and care...
public class Life : ICareable,IShareable
{
// implements yours...
}
|
|
|
|
|
They will be:
1. Exception Handling
1. Reliability
1. Availability
1. Performance
1. Security
Oh, did you mean real code? then:
1. Usability (that's that it works and does what it supposed to do)
Everything else is a bonus.
|
|
|
|
|
 
Life is all about share and care...
public class Life : ICareable,IShareable
{
// implements yours...
}
|
|
|
|
|
None of the above.
IMHO the most important aspect of coding is CLARITY!
Clarity makes all the others possible. Without it, you can't implement any of the others.
Clarity is why we create subroutines and classes: To break up the code into manageable chunks mere humans can understand. Clarity is why we have comments and expressive variable/method names.
Clarity is why a method of three subroutine calls in a loop is superior to a 200-line mess that no one can understand or reliably modify.
Clarity is key to writing maintainable, reliable code.
Good programmers strive for clarity.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm with you although I'd call it: Maintainability
Of course, for small throwaway apps, this doesn't matter. But for apps that will need to be maintained and enhanced and modified over time, it is important to have it coded properly, not just have it working. It is important to be able to make changes to it without breaking everything (or having to spend a week, six months down the road, trying to figure out how the code is actually working so that I can enhance it), etc.
My two cents,
-D
|
|
|
|
|
Yes you are rite but still above mentioned points as also applicable while development.
Life is all about share and care...
public class Life : ICareable,IShareable
{
// implements yours...
}
|
|
|
|
|
and really enjoying your work 
David
|
|
|
|
|
Which work dear I did not get your point. whatever thanks for comments.
Life is all about share and care...
public class Life : ICareable,IShareable
{
// implements yours...
}
|
|
|
|
|
6: Something no other software has done.
5 down to 1: it's called a Try Catch.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: 1: it's called a Try Catch.
I think you want to mentioned Exception Handling.
Life is all about share and care...
public class Life : ICareable,IShareable
{
// implements yours...
}
|
|
|
|
|
1. Exception Handling
2. Reliability
3. Availability
4. Performance
5. Security
0. Well documented, maintainable code.
Inevitably you will get 1-5 wrong but without 0 you have little to no chance of fixing the problems.
|
|
|
|
|
Scope Document, Technical Document , RTM (Requirement Tractability Matrix) are most impotent in prospect of Documentation.
Life is all about share and care...
public class Life : ICareable,IShareable
{
// implements yours...
}
|
|
|
|
|
Accuracy. Everything else can get stuffed.
|
|
|
|
|
Accuracy always depends on functionality and desire output...
Life is all about share and care...
public class Life : ICareable,IShareable
{
// implements yours...
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
with Cold drinks ( diet) 
Life is all about share and care...
public class Life : ICareable,IShareable
{
// implements yours...
}
|
|
|
|
|
I bring your attention to the first paragraph[^].
"I'm so glad to have this fight rescheduled – in my opinion, he's a classless pre-madonna, a diva, a no-good wannabe Bollywood actor and I can't wait to put him in his place," said Fury.
A pre-madonna FFS? This is meant to be a high-brow Newspaper as well.
|
|
|
|
|
WTE is that cardigan he is wearing?
"Rock journalism is people who can't write interviewing people who can't talk for people who can't read." Frank Zappa 1980
|
|
|
|
|
From Article: pre-madonna
That's his way of saying his opponent is old.
It was broke, so I fixed it.
|
|
|
|
|
S Houghtelin wrote: pre-madonna
Is that a written quote from a boxer who has been hit in the head too often, or a journo who has had one too many liquid lunches?
=========================================================
I'm an optoholic - my glass is always half full of vodka.
=========================================================
|
|
|
|
|
 I had thought that as well, was it a misquote from a reporter with bad language skills or an idiot boxer with bad language skills. It probably was both, we now know why they sent that reporter to the boxer's press conference.
It was broke, so I fixed it.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
