|
The best collaboration happens when the team members are each mindful of the global context, the product objectives, while implementing their part of the work. Collaboration fails when "not my job" is the prevailing mind-set.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
...and if you run out of that: A sledgehammer! 
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-----
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-----
I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy.
Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
I don't understand why "File management" is so much important where GIT/SVN is already there? - Thanks, Johny
|
|
|
|
|
Those are very helpful. They can even make all the other tools redundant.
|
|
|
|
|
If you have code....No other things needed.
Believe me, You are the KING 
Find More .Net development tips at : .NET Tips
The only reason people get lost in thought is because it's unfamiliar territory.
|
|
|
|
|
Really it depends upon the project, scope of the project , size of the team members,although all these factors are considerable the Source code versioning and the documentation part is important among the all types of the projects.
|
|
|
|
|
REPOST
Find More .Net development tips at : .NET Tips
The only reason people get lost in thought is because it's unfamiliar territory.
|
|
|
|
|
Really it depends upon the project, scope of the project , size of the team members,although all these factors are considerable the Source code versioning is important among the all types of the projects.
|
|
|
|
|
The best projects where I worked with others were when I could depend on the others to hand me working code to be integrated with mine.
The worse were when a person would hand me code they swore they had tested and then it failed immediately, no chance that it ever worked.
A great experience I had once was with a programmer I had worked together before with, but not as integrated as this particular project was. He and I sat down, decided what was going to be done, divided the labor, and made clear the interface points between our work and then we went our own directions and when we zipped our code together, it worked fantastically!
Psychosis at 10
Film at 11
Those who do not remember the past, are doomed to repeat it.
Those who do not remember the past, cannot build upon it.
|
|
|
|
|
Some of these tools really aren't very useful in small projects. The development methodology of the project also makes a difference. In older methodologies such as Waterfall, instant messaging and discussions aren't quite as important as in Agile since the requirements are basically written in stone.
In Agile, the requirement process is much more flexible and developers need to have more contact with the customer. Therefore, being able to have contact is much more important.
Without defining what kind of project they were looking to get data on, the results of the poll are somewhat meaningless. Perhaps this poll should have been more specific to the type and size of project it was looking for.
|
|
|
|
|
The trouble with collaboration is that it involves more than one person and that is a recipe for disaster.
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair.
Those who seek perfection will only find imperfection
nils illegitimus carborundum
me, me, me
me, in pictures
|
|
|
|
|
... and it's real trouble when someone with that attitude is part of a development team.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Whilst I appreciate the point, being in a team and collaborating are 2 very different things.
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair.
Those who seek perfection will only find imperfection
nils illegitimus carborundum
me, me, me
me, in pictures
|
|
|
|
|
My experience has been that lone wolves are more of a hindrance than a help. They don't collaborate. They go their own way, and pay little attention to the needs of the project or their coworkers. You end up working around them. The net result is project failure, or at best unnecessary delays.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Shouldn't be better if answer in the result are sorted in descending order?
|
|
|
|
|
No, they make a nice curve at the moment.
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
... the 1 to 5 carried no meaning.
1 Highest Priority or Lowest Importance
.
3 Neutral
.
5 Lowest Priority or Highest Importance
|
|
|
|
|
I figured it was like the 5-star voting on articles.
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
I figured that they wrote "(1 = not important, 5 = important)" at the top, so nothing to guess.
I will never again mention that Dalek Dave was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel.
The console is a black place [taken from Q&A]
How to ask a question
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmm, I don't think that was there when I voted, but I could be wrong.
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
It wasn't
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
when creating a survey, not only should one always specify if the highest or lowest number is best (it's NOT a given), but more importantly has an option to allow one to not answer irrelevant options.
Many a survey's answers are merged with the bull-droppings of forced answers. In my case, that presumes I'll even finish such a survey.
[edit]
What is the proper answer for not-relevant? 1? 3? 5? Would it really be too much trouble to either allow skipping questions or adding N/A ???
[/edit]
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error." - Weisert | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
modified 26-May-14 7:47am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have a feeling you're going to regret asking that.
Some men are born mediocre, some men achieve mediocrity, and some men have mediocrity thrust upon them.
|
|
|
|
|
Not at all the same.
Not Important implies a ranking - a relevance. In other words, some weight was given. An implied comparison.
Not Relevant implies that there's no rank as it doesn't have a valid connection (within the context). Not a comparison.
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error." - Weisert | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
