|
No problem. Those articles should be deleted.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
I would suggest a review of this article: Complete Managed Media Aggregation Part III : Quantum Computing in C# Today?[^]
Honestly I don't know if I'm missing the point of the article or if it's just a steaming pile of nonsense the author is trying to sell as the best thing ever, e.g.Quote: ICoreUnit - This represents the core units of energy the Framework is able to work with, right now only Transistor is implemented but in the future Qubit's could be easily implemented using this Framework with minor adjustments.
|
|
|
|
|
Would it be interesting an article about MFC and PowerShell integration? Something like a MFC class to drive PowerShell.
|
|
|
|
|
Read the article guidelines, and if you think it fits within the rules, post it and see what feedback you get.
|
|
|
|
|
I posted this article[^], which is a list article like this one[^], but it got closed as Unclear or Incomplete. Why is it unclear? Were the closers wrong in this case?
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
---
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
---
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
Dunno. Should it be a reference instead?
modified 18-Feb-15 22:14pm.
|
|
|
|
|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: referejmce
Not sure what that is, but I think you mean Reference.
EDIT: It is. I will change that.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
---
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
---
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
I am thinking of writing an article on electronics-related things (e.g. Software, Parts, Books, Websites, etc) and I am wondering where it would best fit. Here? RootAdmin? Or somewhere else?
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
---
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
---
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe in Hardware and System[^]. Sean's in the process of splitting that section into two separate Hardware and System sections.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
That makes sense. I will start work on it now.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
---
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
---
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
It got closed as unclear or imcomplete. I restarted it here[^]. Could someone tell me what I should do to make it complete?
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
---
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
---
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
Format is a bit messed up and I can't tell the owner due to missing message board.
Can someone have a look?
http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?waid=159404&aid=876274[^]
thanks
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Rescued.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Sean
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why bring it up here? The people who can do it are the ones who will see that thread in Sugs and Bugs. You just have to have a little bit of patience.
|
|
|
|
|
All fixed.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, article 'Technical guide on c and related topics' was published however due to serious comments it was closed and I accidentally ended up closing my account. However, now that I have reopened my account with different membership number, and also posted modified article (by closing all comments to previous article) which has been once again published. However, the old article still exists as 'closed' and appears when googled.
So how to get rid of this old article link?
|
|
|
|
|
Could you post the link please?
|
|
|
|
|
|
I've killed it. The link in Google doesn't take you to the article now.
|
|
|
|
|
I have started writing an article and I have saved it as a draft. When I try to "preview" it. I get weird tags for one link and looks good for another link.
BTW, both link refers to same article.
Works fine:
Protected Access Modifier
Issue:
Protected Access Modifier
I am not sure how to resolve this. Any help is appreciated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes. The link you mentioned is the one I am working with
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
