|
Decided to create my own backup system (as I'm fed up with none of them doing exactly what I wanted)
And since I'm moving to GIT under VS2013, I started there.
Eventually worked out how to create a repo and connect it to a VS project again - and wrote a quick Tip so I stand a chance of remembering next time.
And then I started "filling in the blanks". Created the DAL project in the solution, committed, synced.
And because I like to know these things, checked the BitBucket Repo...no source files in the new project. the .prk file was there, but no source.
Long story short: if you look in your gitignore file that VS creates, it specifically excludes anything starting with "backup"... so everything in my BackupOrganiser DAL project is totally ignored. 
That's a morning wasted, then... 
Delete the project, commit, sync, create with a new name, commit, sync...and it works... 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: and wrote a quick Tip
Here? I can't see...
A bit OT - why BitBucket (I'm too used it for my last two projects and liked it, but still curious)?
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We use BitBucket here at the shop. It has a better licensing model as well. However, if your repo is going to be public facing, I have read that GitHub is better for that.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know about Griff, but I use BitBucket because it it's free, and still allows me to have private repos, unlike GitHub, when I last looked.
No object is so beautiful that, under certain conditions, it will not look ugly. - Oscar Wilde
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: the .prk file was there, but no source
What did you expect from a "prick" file? 
|
|
|
|
|
Well, a "j" would have helped...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Did a code review on your hint and/or tip
you spelled anythign
PooperPig - Coming Soon
|
|
|
|
|
Oh wow! Finally upgraded my laptop with an SSD and 8 Gig. Build time dropped by 43%! Da*n, technology, you are impressive!
Maybe some more coding in the future, and possibly another article or two because of the additions! Hope you are all having fun. Tried some gin because of some of the posts in here, but can't say I'll ever be a fan  I think I'd get sick before drunk!
That's all for this brief exclamation. Happy coding!
|
|
|
|
|
David O'Neil wrote: Da*n, technology, you are impressive!
I Also thought that when I first saw non-mechanical mass storage in action around 1980.[^] But no, we had to go with mechanical hard drives for a few decades longer.
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a f***ing golf cart.
"I don't know, extraterrestrial?"
"You mean like from space?"
"No, from Canada."
If software development were a circus, we would all be the clowns.
|
|
|
|
|
I learned a few programming skills on my own, not on the job, but through my own coding and analysis of source code samples, like .NET, C#, Java, etc. Is it OK to put "familiar with .NET, C#, Java" on my resume. Usually, "familiar with" means "comfortable with", even though some dictionaries suggest it means "to have a good knowledge of".
This issue refers to the section with general skills, the experience section would list the on-the-job skills.
|
|
|
|
|
I can't imagine what goes on in recruiters/screeners' heads, but if I were interviewing you and saw the term "familiar with," that would "register" as an ambiguous term, and would make me immediately want to question you in in detail on what your "familiarity" was, exactly.
imho, "have specific experience with" is less ambiguous.
imho, it is always wiser to claim you know less, and demonstrate you know more, than to claim you know more and then be able to demonstrate less.
cheers, Bill
«To kill an error's as good a service, sometimes better than, establishing new truth or fact.» Charles Darwin in "Prospero's Precepts"
|
|
|
|
|
BillWoodruff wrote: it is always wiser to claim you know less, and demonstrate you know more, than
to claim you know more and then be able to demonstrate less.
that's almost a quote from a Bond Film isn't it - Im sure it was John Cleese playing the part, and a repartee between him and Bond was along the lines of 'being smarter than you look is better than looking smarter than you are'
|
|
|
|
|
CRobert456 wrote: some dictionaries suggest it means "to have a good knowledge of".
Nah, it means "I read about it in a blog a while back".
If you have experience with something, then say "experience".
|
|
|
|
|
"Familiar with", typically means:
Capable of keying in, saving to a file, building and executing "Hello World", in the language mentioned.
modified 26-Apr-15 4:15am.
|
|
|
|
|
If it's just a summary in the form of a list, I just tend to put it in a sentence with a lot of commas!
If it's more detailed I like to try to include the context - e.g.
I wrote a personal website using ASP.Net 4 using C# for the family photo album.
I wrote PooperPig (blah about that) in Objective C, and recently converted it to C++
I wrote DigiTVTimer (blah about that) in Delphi 5.0
If it is "I read a blog about it once" I don't mention it at all.
PooperPig - Coming Soon
|
|
|
|
|
CRobert456 wrote: s it OK to put "familiar with .NET, C#, Java" on my resume.
No. Put a specific # of months/years of actual working with and indicate which language/framework versions. If you can, pick one or two language / framework features you have worked specifically with, for example, threading, Linq, async, etc.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
7.5 Magnitude Earthquake in Nepal[^]
I pray for the people who perished in this disaster as well as their friends and families. ![Rose | [Rose]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
Terrible.
Nature is all too powerful.
modified 26-Apr-15 4:14am.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm surprised democrats haven't tried to legislate some of that power away from its rightful owner...
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
A somewhat misplaced attempt at humour I feel.
|
|
|
|
|
No, a misplaced attempt at humor would have been if I stated concern for the accessibility of Tier 1 technical support for various American companies that feel compelled to offshore that kind of job.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nah. He can just say "Israel". That's way more awkward than Birmingham.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
