|
|
Phew I'm back 
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry about that. 
|
|
|
|
|
No worries. I saw that you responded as quickly as you could to remedy the error, and that's as much as anyone can do 
We all make mistakes as we're all human.
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The email service stopped without auto-restarting. Kicked.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I turned off forum email notifications some time ago. Until earlier today, the settings were saved every time I posted a new message.
Now, every time I post a message, I have to remember to un-tick both "E-mail me if someone replies to this message" and "Allow private email replies to this message".
Can we have the old behaviour back please!
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
And now they are saved. 
One of the hamsters must have nodded off for a few minutes.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
We'll switch back to the espresso-based pellets.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I found this bug based on this spam report[^].
This member[^] (well, spammer, actually :P) has MayankTripathi as username. However, there is also a member that has the member name mayankTripathi[^], and when you click on the @-link on the spammer's profile, you get redirected to the profile of the other member.
To me, it looks like a bug that it's possible to have two members with a username that's the same aside from capitalization. Can you please take a look at it?
The quick brown ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
I thought this sounded familiar!
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
I mistakenly marked this member[^] (Not the one in the post below) as a Spammer 
Totally unintended (hit wrong tab in browser). Could the report be removed please
|
|
|
|
|
I've removed the report.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks 
|
|
|
|
|
Avijnata[^] has been voted off as a spammer, Shirley that can't be correct, or?
|
|
|
|
|
I agree. I've asked about it in the Lounge (direct reply to Griff who was one of the 3 people that reported him).
|
|
|
|
|
I also reported him, according to his profile, but I cannot find the original entry in the Spam forum that I responded to. The problem is that we generally accept the word of the person who posts the original report, but most of the time the offending message(s) is not viewable.
|
|
|
|
|
If you go through his history, whether articles or forum posts, he seems to be a very nice chap. I think he was unfairly removed over some possible misreporting.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree, but I still cannot find the original message that reported him. Let's hope Chris can do the magic.
|
|
|
|
|
This is a rather unprofessional workflow though. If he was using his real name, now he has a public profile on CP visible to current and future employers that lists him as a spammer (when he is not). This is also risky for CP because there might be someone unfairly removed who might sue CP for character defamation. 
|
|
|
|
|
Nish Nishant wrote: he seems to be a very nice chap.
I can vouch for that.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks.
Hope I live to these words 
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, Jorgen.
Restored.
|
|
|
|
|
A couple of times recently I have received the email notification that someone replied to my comment. When I click the link, their message is not there. However, a few hours to a day later the message does show. I imagine this may be the SPAM filter/moderator queue holding it.
I realize it may mean a big change in code but it would be helpful to receive email notifications of replies to our comments after the spam filter/moderator queue has done its thing.
I don't have any specific examples, this just seems to be the likely cause of what's happening.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
