Including files and images correctly - Article Writing Discussion Boards

In this particular case I need to talk to the author about a non-language related issue first.

Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject

Luckily, before I left the in-progress edit of my article I saved off the HTML, but in any case this article won't display for me:
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/1024774/Firebase-Web-Apps-Will-Change-Your-Thinking-WebSoc[^]

Click the link, you'll probably see the angry hamsters.
Can anyone help?
Thanks,

I've been trying for a few hours now. It finally came back. No more hamsters.

CPS1.NET
No downloads and no image, you approval it soon.
Now I've fixed it, and there is a new version of it. But no one approval it. Why? Approval the new version please.

This is a world wide site, the people who likes your article to be approved might be sleeping or at work. Please be patient.

~~By the way, the images are not being displayed~~ forget it, images are there now

M.D.V.

If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

Some of us compulsive editors are awake Wink | ;)

cheers

Chris Maunder

I have asked Sean below about the images. I know they are justified by the article and they are kinda needed for the explanation as well. But lately Sean asked us to be a bit harder with it and point him out such cases because of possible copyright issues.

What do you mean in this case?

M.D.V.

If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

I've had a little bit of trouble when embedding images and files in articles (using the functions in the right side bar). Sometimes they display correct when editing and previewing, but not on the article once it's been queued for publishing.

Has this something to do with the pending state or is there something else I should check when writing an article?

One that looked fine in preview but not pending is:
www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?waid=181488&aid=1023523[^]

Unfortunately we still have not isolated this bug. Once the article is published, the images will look fine.

Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject

Thanks for the quick feedback!

Hi @Sean-ewington

another one to be checked (although I am pretty sure about the result)
http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?waid=181356&aid=1023175[^]

M.D.V.

If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

Just to confirm, are you reporting the movie images?

Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject

yes, as you told in other message

Is it wrong?

M.D.V.

If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

This is a very weird case. It's almost meta. It looks like he's making a movie review website, and taking screenshots of his movie reviews. There are different allowances (I believe) for using images on movie review sites, but this is simply an image of a movie review site and does not contain actually movie criticism. Still ...

This may be too complicated to call definitely from my chair.

Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject

Sean Ewington wrote:
This may be too complicated to call definitely from my chair.

Noone said it was going to be easy. Actually tough ones are exactly the ones where I don't say anything to the user. If it is a easy one I try it myself.

M.D.V.

If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

This one is one is a difficult one.

I like the article and the images are kinda needed for the explanation, but I think they are copyright of the arcade games company, and the 50 years are not over yet.

http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?waid=181719&aid=998595[^]

M.D.V.

If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

MAME alone is a tricky legal issue, I am not qualified to make an accurate final ruling, but as you say the article does not work without the images so we'll leave it for now.

Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject

Is there any other CP-Staff Member that is deeper in such thema?

M.D.V.

If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

Yes and no. So I took the cans of worms to our lawyers who gave us more cans and more worms and some thinking and discussing to do internally. So for now please sit tight. We will arrive at a conclusion in due course.

Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject

Sean Ewington wrote:
So for now please sit tight

Meaning I should give you a brake? Or should I continue pointing out what I find?

M.D.V.

If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

You can still poke around but no actions will occur until our discussions and policies are in place.

Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject

Ok... I'll make a list.

Anyways I am going away for 5 weeks (working in another continent) so my availability will be quite reduced.

See you around

M.D.V.

If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

According to a message in the B&S Forum about copyright of images...

@Sean-ewington can you please check this[^]? Is such allowed? or better to contact the user?

It might be not the last one that I post.. how do you prefer o be done? Posting it here or something else?

M.D.V.

If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

If digital ocean and its services weren't mentioned so much and linked to, then maybe. Bower seems harmless. But unfortunately we've had too much abuse of community reviews and we've had to crack down on them. The article has been removed.

Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject

And the way of procedure?

Post here summoning you, so you can have a look?
or better in Abuse report forum and let the guys decide?

M.D.V.

If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.