|
Another one.
When using the hash character as first one after a pre tag, there must be a space or line feed inserted. Otherwise it will miss the hash in the final post but not in the preview.
This will show up without the hash character in QA (here in the forum it is OK):
<pre>#define SOME_DEF 0</pre>
define SOME_DEF 0
This will be OK.
<pre>
#define SOME_DEF 0</pre>
#define SOME_DEF 0
|
|
|
|
|
When you respond to messages in forums you can uncheck the "Use Markdown formatting" checkbox at the bottom.
I don't know if it's global and affects also Q&A (where I haven't seen any such checkbox), but it's worth trying.
|
|
|
|
|
It doesn't affect QA. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Nothing affects QA. It has grown beyond our comprehension.
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver
"When you have eliminated the JavaScript, whatever remains must be an empty page." -- Mike Hankey
If a coffee bean is between the Earth and the Sun, is it a Java Eclipse? -- Sascha Lefèvre
/xml>
|
|
|
|
|
I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Markdown is schizophrenic. And bipolar.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
This isn't a markdown issue. It looks like it's a processing issue our end.
Added to the TODO
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I was just reading over my article in an attempt to clean it up some and I noticed that an image was missing.
ASP.NET MVC : Build Your Custom Blog Engine (CMS) - Part 1 of 2(Own ASP.NET MVC)[^]
Bad Root Path
I did an inspect (in Chrome) and checked the image name which is UnRio17.png.
Chrome offers the absolute path to that same image as:
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/1072781/unrio17.png -- if you navigate to that path, you see a CP error.
Finding a Good RootPath
I examined another image in my article and saw the rootpath is probably supposed to be:
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/aspnet/1072781/
I took that rootpath and pasted on the name of my image that wasn't displaying and voila the image loaded:
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/aspnet/1072781/UnRio17.png[^]
I also tried a refresh on the page to see if somehow those rootpaths are generated and would generate properly, but the image never shows.
I hope this helps make resolving the issue a bit more easy.
Thanks,
|
|
|
|
|
As mentioned by @Nelek , It makes sense if the protectors can get a visibility of members who have approved some dubious articles.
@chris-maunder mentioned that little education should solve the problem. In such case if the protectors know who has been careless with the approval system, they can explain them the process
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
The members who approved an article are already shown at the bottom left.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
To moderators or to all gold members?
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
plz tell ,what is scope of microsoft coded ui in future.
is there opening in big organisation for microsoft coded ui.
presently i m working with asp.net and mvc. i have 4.6 + experience.
i have switched a company. company is giving work in microsoft coded ui.
will it good for me.
|
|
|
|
|
Pramod, you have asked your question in the wrong forum. This forum is for bugs and suggestions about the usage of the CodeProject forum, and is not for posting general questions.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
And in addition to Pete's comments, no one can tell you what is the best choice of career path, or what is likely to happen in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
Pramod, I deleted your other message because you posted it in the same forum.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
plz share me the path for posting the same
|
|
|
|
|
You might want to try the General Indian Topics[^] forum - the regulars there will have a much better idea of the jobs market in India than someone like myself. Alternatively, if you're feeling brave, try the Lounge[^]; but be aware that the answers there will probably not be as helpful.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
Come-on! The Lounge is a very serious place for very serious discussions...You should not lame it like this 
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Just updated Firefox to 44.0.
The format options and emoticons are missing again like reported here Bugs and Suggestions - CodeProject[^] and before for older updates.
Must it be fixed now with each new FF version?
|
|
|
|
|
Same here. FYI:
User Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:44.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/44.0
CRC 2440239949
Edge False
Chrome False
Gecko True
IE False
Opera False
Safari False
Blink False
WebKit False
Browser Firefox
Platform Type Desktop
Standard True
Display Mode Normal
Version string 0.0
Version 0
Platform Win7
Platform Version 6.1
Editable Elements False
Mobile Device False
Small Mobile Device False
Touch Device False
Desktop True
Tablet False
Modern False
Semi-Modern False
Cookies OK? True
Server Web02
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like it's been fixed - the formatting options are there for me. 
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:44.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/44.0
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Though I'm also running FF 44, still no formatting options here.
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
That's odd. What does the browser check page[^] say?
I get:
User Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:44.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/44.0
CRC 2569830139
Edge False
Chrome False
Gecko True
IE False
Opera False
Safari False
Blink False
WebKit False
Browser Firefox
Platform Type Desktop
Standard True
Display Mode Normal
Version string 44.0
Version 44
Platform Windows NT
Platform Version Windows NT
Editable Elements True
Mobile Device False
Small Mobile Device False
Touch Device False
Desktop True
Tablet False
Modern True
Semi-Modern True
Cookies OK? True
Server Web03
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
"Version string" and "Version" have values of 0.0 / 0 instead of 44.0 / 44 for whatever reason. But the 44 is still in the User Agent string.
User Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:44.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/44.0
CRC 2440239949
Edge False
Chrome False
Gecko True
IE False
Opera False
Safari False
Blink False
WebKit False
Browser Firefox
Platform Type Desktop
Standard True
Display Mode Normal
Version string 0.0
Version 0
Platform Win7
Platform Version 6.1
Editable Elements False
Mobile Device False
Small Mobile Device False
Touch Device False
Desktop True
Tablet False
Modern False
Semi-Modern False
Cookies OK? True
Server Web02
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
I'm seeing the same issue. Browser check page is returning 0.0/0 for version string and version, and I'm still on FF 43.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
