|
DeeExpus: a very nice  ... beautiful guitar playing, a melodic style very reminiscent of Joe Satriani (... high praise intended by that statement). I like the mix of vintage synths (analogues + glissando =  ) and the twin/double guitar solo stuff.
Moving into a very different genre, have you ever heard of a guitarist/singer/song writer called George Ross Watt (who sadly passed a few yers ago)? ... when I 1st stared out guitar playing in the late 80s/90s, hell bent on Hendrix/SRV/Rory etc this was guy to see in town.
There's not alot of his stuff out there (... some old camcorder type footage in youtube, a couple of albums on Spotify). I can't send links as I'm at work just now, but if you search Spotify for "Big George and the Business" and "George Ross Watt" - if you can have a listen to a track called "The Storm" from "The Alleged Album" ... haunting guitar playing.
|
|
|
|
|
I haven't heard of him. I'll give him a listen.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
Stylistically, he reminds me of another mate of mine. The incredible Russ Tippins[^]
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
Just had a listen to Russ ... loving his cover of Jimis Freedom.
... his style reminds me of Audley Freed when he was in the band Cry Of Love.
Sounds like he'll fit right into my usual daily listening stack ... and another 1 added to the spotify playlist!
|
|
|
|
|
Cry of Love. Been a long time since I heard that. Yet another to resurrect for my collection. Thanks.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
hypermellow wrote: I'm listening to Moving Waves just now, shocked at how much it sounds like later period Floyd, they must have been listening to this before they made Wish You Where Here.
You cannot be serious?
I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!
|
|
|
|
|
I'm afraid I am serious  
I can draw a few parallels with the Floyd from the Moving Waves album, elements from Dark Side to Division Bell. I do think the Floyd were probably listening to Focus, too many similarities song/album structure, and there's a few Akkerman traits that I can hear in Gilmours playing.
|
|
|
|
|
The only problem with this marvellous theory (apart from the fact that I hear absolutely nothing of these alleged comparisons in the music at all) is that neither Gilmour nor any member of the band at the time has so much as mentioned Akkerman or Focus in the vast number of interviews they have given on the subject of their musical educations, inspirations, development or personal taste. Frankly the notion that Gilmour's quintessentially English, dark, brooding, classical, soaring style is in any way be influenced by the thoroughly continental, cool dude, punny, jamming, jazz pastiche style of Focus, especially on the Moving Waves album (Hocus, Pocus, for crying out loud!) makes no sense at all! Floyd and Focus are poles apart on the 'prog rock' spectrum. Camel I could believe, Floyd is just laughable.
I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!
|
|
|
|
|
9082365 wrote: apart from the fact that I hear absolutely nothing of these alleged comparisons in the music at all
... and here lies that part that's missed on you.
There is no marvellous theory, or a problem with something that doesn't exist.
Music is subjective, and I simply stated an observation, my observation.
I'm not surprised you unable to hear the similarities between the 2, if your trying to hear it in a track like Hocus Pocus. Maybe try listening to something like Eruption, plenty of soaring guitar there, some of it almost like the Floyds money (esp around 9:20).
Strange how 2 people can listen to the same pieces of music, and find the other opinion laughable is it? ... maybe that's the subjective part of Music eh?
|
|
|
|
|
There is a considerable difference between saying ...
I think there are some parts of this record sound a bit like Dave Gilmour
... and ...
Dave Gilmour obviously listened to this record and used it as a source for his own later work.
In your original comments it was clearly the second which you were saying and it is that which is objectively laughable, your attempt to now pretend that you were only saying the first notwithstanding. The distinctive Gilmour style in evidence on the recordings you name is also evident on recordings which predate Focus's very existence so if you want to suggest that there is influence it can only be the other way round, Akkerman producing a (pale) imitation of an already matured Gilmour. That I could believe (well, with a little actual evidence). Your weird and wonderful theory just doesn't add up historically. Subjectivity be damned!
I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!
|
|
|
|
|
9082365 wrote: Your weird and wonderful theory just doesn't add up historically
 You're still not getting this are you? ... for the 2nd time (see previous reply for the 1st) ... there is no theory, weird nor wonderful.
9082365 wrote: Dave Gilmour obviously listened to this record and used it as a source for his own later work.
And when did I say this? ... oh yeah, never  the closest I said has been:
I'm listening to Moving Waves just now, shocked at how much it sounds like later period Floyd, they must have been listening to this before they made Wish You Where Here. ... and as an opinion, my option I agree.
9082365 wrote: Akkerman producing a (pale) imitation of an already matured Gilmour
... you think? IMO Gilmour only started having any influence in Floyd around Meddle (... same time as Moving Waves?), and matured (... for me) somewhere around Darkside/WYWH (i.e. mid '70s). I get that you come across as a big Floyd fan (as am I), but I cannot begin to grasp the concept of Akkerman being an imitation (pale or not) of an already matured Gilmour?? ... what were you saying about something not adding up historically?
I'm not bashing, or downing on Gilmour in any way, he is an incredible guitarist, one of the very few who are truly 'one offs' and have managed to create an instantly recognisable style & sound (more so than Akkerman).
If you have listened to some Focus, and can't hear anything that reminds you of the Floyd, then fair enough - that the subjective part again. Nobody is trying to force you to hear anything, there is no theory - again, just my opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Golden Earring, although I had to google to confirm that.
|
|
|
|
|
I'll throw Delain in there, since they toured with Within Temptation
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I know these and I am not cheating 
Within Temptation,
Epica,
The Gathering,
Mercenary,
Golden Earring
...
I knew a few more but forgot them now
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think Abba is a dutch band; swedish I think. And we could discuss whether it is a rock band
But I can be wrong.
You always obtain more by being rather polite and armed than polite only.
|
|
|
|
|
meh. Swedish/Dutch/Danish is all the same I think.
|
|
|
|
|
Abba is neither Dutch nor are they Rock. And the same goes for the others.
I believe Pompeyboy is just being himself.
|
|
|
|
|
The only one I can think of is Urban Dance Squad.
You always obtain more by being rather polite and armed than polite only.
|
|
|
|
|
Ha ha that has been awhile 
|
|
|
|
|
Yep! it brings me back to my old and happy student days
You always obtain more by being rather polite and armed than polite only.
|
|
|
|
|
What do you want:
1 Dutch origin (as in The Netherlands)
2 Dutch speaking (as in Flemish and Dutch)
3 Singing in Dutch (and not English)
1: Golden Earring
2: The Scabs, Hooverphonic, Channel Zero
3: Cpex, Belgian Asociality
And with that I assume you mean really "rock" or heavier as main stream, because I know a lot of artists which have an occasional rock song or have an extensive protfolio in another genre.
Does that suffice ? 
|
|
|
|
|
Don't kill me for this:
Caught in the act
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
