|
Do they have really the chance?
I had some luck (?, yes it was really ok and helped) to be confronted with SAK at my very beginning. I don’t know why, but SAK that time was patiently to guide me. I think also SAK does not always pay that much patience for beginners; it was only a lucky shot for me.
I only like that all beginners have the same Chance what I had.
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Do you mean "it's useless for me, as a question asker, in a specific situation" or "it's useless for every situation and of no benefit whatsoever to anyone, anywhere".
Yes, it is useless for most every Situation. In some rare case it is maybe suitable.
Quote: Suggest an improvement that will guide those who are unable (or unwilling) to post their questions clearly.
Sorry, I'm not able to do it. For me the way how CP handles it until now was very ok. Asking a Question was simple.
Also I like to mention: The possibility to join CP without being a member is GREAT! One of the important "Details" which makes CP attractive. Please don't destroy this with artificial burdens to ask a question here.
Bruno
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I changed my E-mail in CP for authoring purposes but CP doesn't send me a confirmation E-mail. I get other things from CP such as my article being published but confirmation does not work--so CP e-mail does get to my new address. When I change back to my older e-mail address I do get the confirmation E-mail. Please help. I would like to use my new address as my older e-mail has too much spam in it to be useful for answering CP questions.
What I've Tried:
I change to my new address in CP and get authoring/publication change notifications but cannot get the confirmation to work
I change back to m old address in CP and suddenly I can get a CP confirmation of my (old) new address
I've done this multiple times back and forth but it's always the same outcome.
|
|
|
|
|
Email me (chris@codeproject.com) directly from the address you wish to confirm
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
The following note appears when searching forum messages only (i.e. only the "Forum Messages" check box is selected) at the bottom of the page:
Note We have changed to default "Sort By" setting to "Date created, descending" since you are only searching forum messages.
Which is fine, but when I try to change the order to "Relevance" from the "Sort by" combo, it goes back to "Created (New - Old)".
[Edited] The other sort options seem to work, though. [/Edited]
|
|
|
|
|
I suggest stopping votes on answers after a certain amount of time.
I got downvoted yesterday for an answer I gave in Q & A 4 years ago. My answer was a valid one (and the question was rather not so), but I guess someone still disliked it.
Moreover, not the case here, but questions could be updated making an earlier answer invalid.
of course, just a suggestion.
|
|
|
|
|
Conversely you could get upvoted too. If someone finds an old thread by googling their issue (I can haz google? Unlikely, I know  ) and they find your solution then they can upvote it if it's good, and that adds to the rep of the solution over time.
|
|
|
|
|
he he, I thought of that, but the likelyhood of an upvote is afar less than that of a downvote and in most cases, even after a few weeks the threads are not actual anymore, anyway 
|
|
|
|
|
I tend to disagree. I've had very old posts upvoted-usually after someone has resurrected an old post but sometimes after a Googler has been in.
Had down votes too, granted.
You will always get the down voters whatever the age of the post
|
|
|
|
|
V. wrote: I got downvoted yesterday
Sorry to hear that. My thoughts are with you at this time. Stay strong.
![Rose | [Rose]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
I frequently get no results when I want to see the reputation page. The page loads but there is no table. After a few refreshes or retries it works, but it is quite annoying.
|
|
|
|
|
What is the official position of the site?
In an article Chris sent me a message saying more or less: That is not a tip, tip must be short.
To be honest, I prefer to keep the focus on good articles having a higher minimum requirements and to have a bigger diversity in tips, than to keep the focus on short tips and everything what is longer going to articles.
In other words... With black and white, the grey zone belongs to tip.
And I think many members think like me. But if I am wrong, then I won't say the "have you consider to post this as a tip?" anymore, if it is not clearly 100% a tip.
I would like to have answers from @Chris-Maunder, @Sean-Ewington at least, other CP-Staff are welcome as well.
Members feel free to answer, I will accept the majority.
Edit: Expanding the types with the "HowTo/Walkthrough" and/or "Guideline" (as suggested short ago) would be a nice feature that would cover most of the grey zone and make it easier to classify.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
read my message please
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Are you asking detail explanation between Tip vs Article? I personally think the definition Sean put is more than enough.
|
|
|
|
|
Another time... please read my message carefully.
I am asking about the gray zone.
Edit: Nevermind I got what I wanted, answer is given.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 10-Feb-16 11:58am.
|
|
|
|
|
Glad you got what you want.
No argument though. I read many times what you wrote. And the answer what I gave and what Sean gave landed on the same content except different links.
Here is the content both places.
What I gave you as a link :
What is a tip?
A Tips and Tricks post is a single problem, with a single solution, and a super-short write-up. Ideally you could consume it in under 30 seconds.
And what Sean gave you :
So we are going to clarify what a tip is: A Tips and Tricks post is a single problem, with a single solution, and a super-short write-up. Ideally you could consume it in under 30 seconds.
I don't think you need article clarification.
|
|
|
|
|
Another time... the question was not about the definition of a tip or the definition of an article, I have read those definitions surely more than you and I use those links always in my messages to articles in moderation.
The full point was about the comparison of both and specially the undefined grey zone between them and how to consider it.
Thanks for trying to help though.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek: I have read those definitions
Actually my answer was not to give a definition. I assume you get the idea of differences or grey zone issues between Tip and Article when you read it and understand their definitions. There is big difference between reading and understanding. To me, this resolves the grey zone.
Now let me step back and ask you a question.
What things you understand as the grey zone issue ? Members will get benefit from this.
modified 16-Mar-16 14:54pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Master.Man1980 wrote: There is big difference between reading and understanding.
It is not the same not understand something, that understand it wrong. With the second you think everything is ok, until someone shows you it is not. I thought I had understood it, but the comment of the other day told me "hey, maybe is not like that". So that's exactly why I am asking, I am asking for clarification.
Not all users are english native (I am not at least). What for you is so clear, for other might be not. And if you are active in the moderation, you will see I am not the only one with similar concept (even many english speakers think/thought like me).
And since I have received a concrete answer with something it is 100% concrete that I find crystal clear... this thread is done for me.
Thanks for trying to help.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek: Thanks for trying to help.
You're welcome.
|
|
|
|
|
|
OK... definition is now clear. Thanks for the answer and the explanation Sean.
If I understand it correctly, the focus is to let tips short and concise and join the grey zone to the articles. I will accordingly reduce my "Have you consider..." posts
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
From my point of view it is simply overkill of definitions over definitions again. Let the author decide whether it is a tip or an article. What I agree is, that an article needs a certain level... what certain level means I'm not able to define.
But a definition, that a tip needs to be readed in 30 seconds.... no sorry, it's stupid. Next definition will be Lounge discussions needs to be readable in 10 Sec...
Only my mind, does not count anyway.
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Way back in the dawn of time everything was an article. There were no tips. The cutoff for acceptance was
1. did the author have the rights to publish it
2. was it on topic
3. was it of sufficient quality
We then added Technical Blogs and Tips/Tricks
These are all still "article types", meaning they must all adhere to the three criteria above.
Technical blogs are technical articles, not ramblings about what you did on a Saturday. They are simply an article that's been posted in a blog and will be aggregated by our crawler and posted as an article.
Tips are "tips". Short, punchy, consumable-in-30-seconds type things with the goal of providing a quick answer to a specific problem.
What I've seen happening is that the tips category has been used for "things not worthy of being an article". If it's not worthy of posting it should be removed. If it's a tip it should be a tip. If it's not a tip then it's an article. "Article" is actually the catch-all here, not tips, and this then leads to the other conversations about whether we need a HowTo category, a Walkthrough category, a Tutorial category, an Interview category etc etc.
The question then comes down to:
1. What value will this add
2. Will this make it more painful for authors.
At this point I'm not willing to introduce more article categories until I feel the "Tips" category is working. The blame for the confusion must lie with us: we're the ones who have been explaining the difference. We'll be the ones to clean it up (mostly). Hopefully from now on everyone else has a clearer picture of what we're trying to do.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
