Click here to Skip to main content
15,314,824 members
Articles / Programming Languages / C++
Posted 13 Dec 2011

Tagged as


49 bookmarked

Hooking the Real COM Objects: Intercepting IHTMLDocument3 Functions

Rate me:
Please Sign up or sign in to vote.
4.86/5 (18 votes)
15 Dec 2011CPOL10 min read
This article presents a problem on hooking real COM objects and shows solutions on it.
Image 1

Table of Contents

  1. Introduction
  2. Motivation
  3. Hooking the COM interface, IHTMLDocument3
  4. Finding problems in the code
    1. Solution #1: Using a naked function
    2. Solution #1: Limitations
    3. Solution #2: Implementing the TearoffThunk12 function to find out the real method
    4. Solution #2: Limitations
  5. Points of Interest
  6. Software based on this technique
  7. References
  8. History


The basic concept of intercepting methods of COM components is quite simple and easy. As many articles [1, 2, 3, 4] explain, you can change an element of component's virtual table to redirect a function to your handler. Theoretically, this mechanism should work for all COM components. However, in reality, you may face some wield errors in implementing and debugging the technique with some COM components. For example, intercepting the IHTMLDocument3::attachEvent method incurs a runtime error.
This article analyzes why these errors occur and presents solutions to the problem.


I decided to write this article to share my experience and knowledge I obtained from implementing one of my applications. A month ago, I started developing an application that incapacitates script code that blocks the copy and paste feature. For example, as an article [5] states, some web sites register some script functions to prevent users from copying and pasting. Basically, most of them can be neutralized by removing registered event handlers. However, if an anonymous function is registered as an event handler by using attachEvent function, the handler cannot be deregistered. This is because detachEvent function requires the identifier of registered function that anonymous functions do not provide.
To figure out the problem, I decided to write code to hook the COM interface, IHTMLDocument3::attachEvent.

Hooking the COM Interface, IHTMLDocument3

Since hooking the COM interface is a well documented topic, this section only includes the code and its detail, not the basic concept and background.
If you would like to see this basic idea in detail, the above articles[1, 2, 3, 4] would be good references.

To intercept a method of IHTMLDocument3 interface, the very first thing to do is obtaining a browser's interface. Since I am working with the Web Browser ActiveX control, I chose the 'DownloadBegin' handler to retrieve the interface. By creating an event handler for 'DownloadBegin', you may get the 'OnDownloadBeginExplorer1' function. As using the below code, you can get the IHTMLDocument3 interface on every web page load. Also, the obtained interface will be available until the web page is reloaded.

void CxxxDlg::OnDownloadBeginExplorer1()
	IDispatch* lpDisp = m_web.GetDocument();
		IHTMLDocument3* pDoc3 = 0;
		hr = lpDisp->QueryInterface( IID_IHTMLDocument3, (void**)&pDoc3);
		if( SUCCEEDED(hr) && pDoc3 ) {
			HookInterface1( pDoc3 );
		} else {
			OutputDebugString("Failed to query interface");
	} else {
		OutputDebugString("Failed to get document");

After that, the next step is constructing a C style interface structure of IHTMLDocument3. Although you can hook a method without a C style interface by using the offset of method, I just use the C interface to make the code readable.

Anyway, the following structure is a part of IHTMLDocument3 structure. Since I just try to hook the attachEvent method, the structure does not include all methods.
To make a C style interface for hooking, you can copy all methods from IDispatchVtbl and the target interface you want to hook in order.

typedef struct IHookHTMLDocument3Vtbl

	    IDispatch * This,
	    /* [in] */ REFIID riid,
	    /* [iid_is][out] */ void **ppvObject);

	    IDispatch * This);

	    IDispatch * This);

	    IDispatch * This,
	    /* [out] */ UINT *pctinfo);

	    IDispatch * This,
	    /* [in] */ UINT iTInfo,
	    /* [in] */ LCID lcid,
	    /* [out] */ ITypeInfo **ppTInfo);

	    IDispatch * This,
	    /* [in] */ REFIID riid,
	    /* [size_is][in] */ LPOLESTR *rgszNames,
	    /* [in] */ UINT cNames,
	    /* [in] */ LCID lcid,
	    /* [size_is][out] */ DISPID *rgDispId);

	/* [local] */ HRESULT ( STDMETHODCALLTYPE *Invoke )(
	    IDispatch * This,
	    /* [in] */ DISPID dispIdMember,
	    /* [in] */ REFIID riid,
	    /* [in] */ LCID lcid,
	    /* [in] */ WORD wFlags,
	    /* [out][in] */ DISPPARAMS *pDispParams,
	    /* [out] */ VARIANT *pVarResult,
	    /* [out] */ EXCEPINFO *pExcepInfo,
	    /* [out] */ UINT *puArgErr);

	// Now you can copy and paste methods from the object what you would like to hook.

	    IHTMLDocument3* This);

	    IHTMLDocument3* This,
	    /* [in][defaultvalue] */ VARIANT_BOOL fForce);

	    IHTMLDocument3* This,
	    /* [in] */ BSTR text,
	    /* [out][retval] */ IHTMLDOMNode **newTextNode);

	HRESULT (STDMETHODCALLTYPE * get_documentElement)(
	    IHTMLDocument3* This,
	    /* [out][retval] */ IHTMLElement **p);

	    IHTMLDocument3* This,
	    /* [out][retval] */ BSTR *p);

	    IHTMLDocument3* This,
	    /* [in] */ BSTR event,
	    /* [in] */ IDispatch *pDisp,
	    /* [out][retval] */ VARIANT_BOOL *pfResult);

// org
//} IDispatchVtbl;
} IHookHTMLDocument3Vtbl;

// org
//interface IDispatch
interface IHookHTMLDocument3
	//CONST_VTBL struct IDispatchVtbl *lpVtbl;
	CONST_VTBL struct IHookHTMLDocument3Vtbl *lpVtbl;

The next is replacing the method with your function. By using the structure we made, you can easily access the address of method without calculating the offset. To overwrite the element of virtual table, the VirtualProtect API is used to make the memory area writable. The HookInterface1 function does that work.

void CIETestDlg::HookInterface1(IHTMLDocument3 *pDoc3)
	IHookHTMLDocument3* pHookDoc3 = (IHookHTMLDocument3*)pDoc3;
	CString s;
	s.Format("Address of Vtbl : %08X, FuncAddr : %08X, mshtml.dll : %08X",
		pHookDoc3->lpVtbl, pHookDoc3->lpVtbl->attachEvent, 
				GetModuleHandle("mshtml.dll") );

	if( (PFNATTACHEVENT)pHookDoc3->lpVtbl->attachEvent != 
				(PFNATTACHEVENT)New_attachEvent ) {
		DWORD dwOldProt = 0;
		if( VirtualProtect(&(pHookDoc3->lpVtbl->attachEvent), 
				4, PAGE_EXECUTE_READWRITE, &dwOldProt) ) {
			g_pfnOrgAttachEvent = (PFNATTACHEVENT)pHookDoc3->
			g_ppfnOrgAttachEvent = (PFNATTACHEVENT*)&
			pHookDoc3->lpVtbl->attachEvent = New_attachEvent;
						4, dwOldProt, &dwOldProt);
		} else {
			OutputDebugString("Failed to unprotect the memory area");
	} else {
		OutputDebugString("This has been already hooked");

The following function is a new handler of attachEvent method. It just shows a message box in order to check the function has been hooked.

			IHTMLDocument3* This,
            /* [in] */ BSTR event,
            /* [in] */ IDispatch *pDisp,
            /* [out][retval] */ VARIANT_BOOL *pfResult)
	CString szEvent ( event );
	AfxMessageBox("The attachEvent method is intercepted: event = " + szEvent);
	return g_pfnOrgAttachEvent( This, event, pDisp, pfResult );

Theoretically, it should work. However, as I stated at the very beginning of this article, it does not work properly. Although it works fine at first glance, the application crashes when you select an object and move your mouse pointer on it. The below picture shows an error occurred due to the above reason.

memory fault

Finding Problems in the Code

To find out what was wrong in the code, the first step is inspecting the program by using a debugger. I inserted a breakpoint (int 3h) in the New_attachEvent function like the below code and ran it in the OllyDbg.

			IHTMLDocument3* This,
            /* [in] */ BSTR event,
            /* [in] */ IDispatch *pDisp,
            /* [out][retval] */ VARIANT_BOOL *pfResult)
	// trap it in the debugger
	__asm int 3h

	return g_pfnOrgAttachEvent( This, event, pDisp, pfResult );

The application will stop at the 'int 3h' and the following screenshot shows the states including stacks and code.

Ollydbg: Application has been stopped in New_attachEvent

As you can see, there is an event name, "oncontextmenu", on the stack (at the right-bottom side of the screen). However, if you select an object and move the mouse pointer on it, the application will show a different stack which does not have an event name. The following picture shows that state.

Ollydbg: the function is also called from other places

How it could be? To see what happened in detail, I disassembled the original code of attachEvent method. As you might already know, I printed the address of the original method in the HookInterface1 function to easily find the code address connected to the IHTMLDocument3 interface.

The following disassembled code is a function which the IHTMLDocument3::attachEvent points. I copied it from the IDA disassembler.

.text:63988944 ; void __stdcall TearoffThunk12(void)
.text:63988944 ?TearoffThunk12@@YGXXZ proc near        ; DATA XREF: .data:64030540 o
.text:63988944                                         ; .data:6403BAC0 o
.text:63988944 arg_0           = dword ptr  4
.text:63988944 ; FUNCTION CHUNK AT .text:63A40595 SIZE 00000008 BYTES
.text:63988944                 mov     eax, [esp+arg_0]
.text:63988948                 push    eax
.text:63988949                 test    dword ptr [eax+1Ch], 1000h
.text:63988950                 jnz     loc_63A40595
.text:63988956 loc_63988956:                           ; 
		CODE XREF: TearoffThunk12(void)+B7C54 j
.text:63988956                 add     eax, 0Ch
.text:63988959                 mov     ecx, [eax]
.text:6398895B                 mov     [esp+4+arg_0], ecx
.text:6398895F                 mov     ecx, [eax+4]
.text:63988962                 mov     ecx, [ecx+30h]
.text:63988965                 pop     eax
.text:63988966                 mov     word ptr [eax+20h], 0Ch
.text:6398896C                 jmp     ecx
.text:6398896C ?TearoffThunk12@@YGXXZ endp

Clearly, the TearoffThunk12 seems to that it does not contain any relevant code for attaching an event handler. In other words, the function TearoffThunk12 does not do the real job for attachEvent. It seems to that it just checks something and jumps to the real handler of attachEvent. After an extensive research, I found that the TearoffThunk12 function is related to a tear-off interface, a dynamically created interface at runtime when it is requested[6]. Specifically, a tear-off interface is usually adopted to implement an interface which is rarely used at runtime in order to save memory space.

With the above information, we can now conclude that the IHTMLDocument3 interface is a tear-off interface. Also, since we observed that the TearoffThunk12 is called from other interfaces when a user moves the mouse point on a selected object, there may be another interface which shares the virtual table of IHTMLDocument3 interface.

By reverse-engineering callers of TearoffThunk12, I found that a method of IHTMLElement interface calls the TearoffThunk12. And I verified it by using the below code:

void CIETestDlg::OnBtnshowvtbl()
	HRESULT hr, hr2 ;
	IDispatch* lpDisp = m_web.GetDocument();
		IHTMLDocument3* pDoc3 = 0;
		IHTMLDocument2* pDoc2 = 0;
		hr2 = lpDisp->QueryInterface( IID_IHTMLDocument2, (void**)&pDoc2);
		hr = lpDisp->QueryInterface( IID_IHTMLDocument3, (void**)&pDoc3);
		if( SUCCEEDED(hr) && SUCCEEDED(hr2) && pDoc3 && pDoc2) {
			IHTMLElement* pElem = 0;
			hr = pDoc2->get_body( (IHTMLElement**)&pElem );
			if( SUCCEEDED(hr) && pElem ) {
				CString s;
				s.Format("%08X  %08X  = 
				pDoc2\n%08X  %08X  = pDoc3\n%08X  %08X  = pElem",
					pDoc2, ((IHookHTMLDocument3*)pDoc2)->lpVtbl,
					pDoc3, ((IHookHTMLDocument3*)pDoc3)->lpVtbl,
					pElem, ((IHookHTMLDocument3*)pElem)->lpVtbl );
			} else {
				OutputDebugString("Failed to get body");
		} else {
			OutputDebugString("Failed to query interface");
	} else {
		OutputDebugString("Failed to get document");

As shown in the below picture, it is very interesting that pDoc3 and pElem both share the virtual table, lpVtbl in the above code.

document and body objects share the virtual table

The below picture shows that the result of test means IHTMLElement and IHTMLDocument3 have the same virtual table.

the structure of virtual table in this case

Therefore, since pDoc3 and pElem share the same lpVtbl, when we changed an element of IHTMLDocument3(pDoc3), IHTMLElement(pElem) is also affected.
However, the number of parameters of the original function can differ from one another. For example, the IHTMLDocument3::attachEvent has 4 parameters whereas the IHTMLElement::put_id method which corresponds to the attachEvent method has 2 parameters. In this case, if IHTMLElement::put_id is called, the stack will be broken and cause runtime errors (memory faults).

Solution #1: Using a Naked Function

In the above section, we have discovered the problem and what happened underneath the COM component. In this section, I suggest the first solution which uses a naked function as a handler.

As you learnt in the classroom, functions usually have prologue code in order to make their own function frame. As well, there is an epilogue code which removes the frame and restores the stack according to the calling convention (cdecl, stdcall, fastcall, etc.) and number of parameters.

Therefore, since it is not determined that the number of parameters of original function which is called by the TearoffThunk12 function, we cannot use a function which has epilogue and prologue code. This is because the prologue and epilogue code will mess up the stack when the original function differs from the new handler's definition.

To figure this problem out, I used a naked function as a handler like the below code:

__declspec( naked ) HRESULT New_attachEvent_naked()
	__asm {
		mov eax, dword ptr[esp+8]
		push eax
		call New_attachEvent_Internal
	__asm {
		jmp g_pfnOrgAttachEvent

void __stdcall New_attachEvent_Internal(BSTR event)
	WCHAR* pwstrEvent = (WCHAR*)event;
	if( pwstrEvent ) {
		// it can be called from other methods.
		// The below code makes sure the pwstrEvent is BSTR and readable.
		memset( &mbi, 0, sizeof(mbi) );
		if( VirtualQuery( pwstrEvent, &mbi, sizeof(mbi) ) > 0 ) {
			DWORD dwBaseAddress = (DWORD)mbi.BaseAddress;
			DWORD dwstrEvent = (DWORD)pwstrEvent;

			if( dwstrEvent == 0 || dwBaseAddress == 0 || 
						mbi.RegionSize == 0 ) {
				return ;

			if( ((DWORD)dwBaseAddress < (DWORD)dwstrEvent) && 
				((DWORD)dwstrEvent < (DWORD)(dwBaseAddress + 
				mbi.RegionSize - 1)) &&
				(mbi.State == MEM_COMMIT) &&
				(	((mbi.Protect & PAGE_EXECUTE_READWRITE) == 
					((mbi.Protect & PAGE_EXECUTE_READ) == 
					((mbi.Protect & PAGE_EXECUTE_WRITECOPY) == 
					((mbi.Protect & PAGE_READONLY) == 
					((mbi.Protect & PAGE_READWRITE) == 
					((mbi.Protect & PAGE_WRITECOPY) == 
						PAGE_WRITECOPY)  ) &&
				(	!((mbi.Protect & PAGE_GUARD) == PAGE_GUARD)	
				if( pwstrEvent[0] == 'o' && pwstrEvent[1] == 'n' ) {
					CString szEvent(pwstrEvent);

					MessageBox( NULL, "The attachEvent method 
					is intercepted: event = " + szEvent,

It just pushes the first parameter(esp+8) and calls the New_attachEvent_Internal function. The New_attachEvent_Internal function validates the parameter by using the VirtualQuery API. Also, you can make sure it is a call for the attachEvent method by checking the first 2 bytes of the event name. If it starts with "on", it must be a request for the attachEvent method. All these validation methods are implemented in the New_attachEvent_Internal function. The below screenshot shows it works well.

now attachEvent has been successfully intercepted

Solution #1: Limitations

Although it works well now, you should be aware that it cannot guarantee that it will work well in the future. If the interface is changed or new interface which is very similar to IHTMLDocument3, but not exactly the same, shares the IHTMLDocument3's virtual table, it would cause another memory fault issues. In these cases, you may add more robust memory checking code to prevent errors.

Solution #2: Implementing the TearoffThunk12 Function to find out the Real Method

Another solution is to find out the real method by implementing the TearoffThunk12 function's code. The brief idea is very simple. According to the above findings, the TearoffThunk12 successfully calls the real methods using the address of instance of interface. Therefore, we can find the real method address if we trace and do what the function does.

The below code is the TearoffThunk12 function and I put some descriptions on that.

61198944   8B4424 04        MOV EAX,DWORD PTR SS:[ESP+4] 	// eax = this
61198948   50               PUSH EAX 			// push this
61198949   F740 1C 00100000 TEST DWORD PTR DS:[EAX+1C],1000	// if( *(this + 0x1C) & 
							// 0x1000 != 0 )
61198950   0F85 3F7C0B00    JNZ mshtml.61250595		// jmp mshtml.61250595
		1.	if( *(this + 0x1C) == 0x1000 ) then goto mshtml.61250595 
								(return code)

61198956   83C0 0C          ADD EAX,0C			// eax = this+0xC
61198959   8B08             MOV ECX,DWORD PTR DS:[EAX]		// ecx = *(this+0xC)
6119895B   894C24 08        MOV DWORD PTR SS:[ESP+8],ECX	// orgparam = *(this+0xC)
		2.	Replace original this pointer in the stack with '*(this + 0xC)'

6119895F   8B48 04          MOV ECX,DWORD PTR DS:[EAX+4]	// ecx = *(this +0xC + 0x4)
61198962   8B49 30          MOV ECX,DWORD PTR DS:[ECX+30]	// ecx = * 
							//( *(this + 0x10) + 0x30 ) )
61198965   58               POP EAX
61198966   66:C740 20 0C00  MOV WORD PTR DS:[EAX+20],0C	// *(this+0x20) = 0xC
		3.	*(this + 0x20) = 0xC;

6119896C   FFE1             JMP ECX				// jmp to real handler
					// (=ecx = *( *(this + 0x10) + 0x30 ) ) )
		4.	jmp *( *(this + 0x10) + 0x30 );

According to the above disassembled code, the TearoffThunk12 function can be summarized to the below C function.

__declspec( naked ) void TearoffThunk12(IDispatch* pThis)
	if( (*(pThis + (0x1C/sizeof(IDispatch*))) & 0x1000) == 0 ) {
		jmp Return_Thunk;

	*pThis = *(pThis + (0xC/sizeof(IDispatch*)));
	*(pThis + (0x20/sizeof(IDispatch*))) = 0xC;

	jmp *( *(pThis + (0x10/sizeof(IDispatch*))) + (0x30/sizeof(IDispatch*)) );

The point is that it uses "*(*(this+0x10)+0x30)" in order to call the original function. One more interesting thing is the number 2 of disassembled code. It replaces the original this pointer in the stack with *(this + 0xC). As you might know, the first parameter of all COM methods is "this pointer". The meaning of changing the first parameter into "*(this + 0xC)" is that the tear-off object stores the original object on "*(this + 0xC)".

Anyway, by inspecting that memory address, I found that it is the real object's virtual table. The full picture of the component is presented in the below picture:

the structure of an instance of tear-off interface

The start address of object means the 'pDoc3' pointer itself. It has several items and one of them is the real object of IHTMLDocument3 and its virtual table. In its virtual table, the 12th method is what we are looking for.

With these findings, I wrote a function for intercepting the method by changing the real object's element of virtual table.

void CIETestDlg::HookInterface3(IHTMLDocument3 *pDoc3)
	CString s;
	IHookHTMLDocument3* pHookDoc3 = (IHookHTMLDocument3*)pDoc3;
	s.Format("Address of Vtbl : %08X FuncAddr : %08X",
		pHookDoc3->lpVtbl->attachEvent );

	LPVOID* lpObj = (LPVOID*)pDoc3;

	// get the mask
	DWORD* pdwMask = (DWORD*)lpObj;
	DWORD dwMask;
	pdwMask = pdwMask + (0x1C / sizeof(DWORD));
	dwMask = *pdwMask;

	if( dwMask & 0x1000 ) {
		OutputDebugString("Something wrong - Error");
	} else {
		LPVOID* lpAddress = NULL;
		LPVOID* lpAddressElem = NULL;

		// Find the address of function
		//  exp: *( *(this + 0x10) + 0x30 )
		// this + 0x10
		lpAddress = lpObj + (0x10 / sizeof(LPVOID));
		// *(this + 0x10)
		lpAddress = (LPVOID*)*lpAddress;
		// *(this + 0x10) + 0x30
		lpAddress = lpAddress + (0x30 / sizeof(LPVOID));
		// *( *(this + 0x10) + 0x30 )
		lpAddressElem = lpAddress; // Save it to hook in later.
		lpAddress = (LPVOID*)*lpAddress;

		if( (PFNATTACHEVENT)lpAddress != (PFNATTACHEVENT)New_attachEvent ) {
			// try to replace the function address
			DWORD dwOldProt = 0;
			if( VirtualProtect(lpAddressElem, 4, 
				g_pfnOrgAttachEvent = (PFNATTACHEVENT)lpAddress;
				g_ppfnOrgAttachEvent = 
				*lpAddressElem = New_attachEvent;
					4, dwOldProt, &dwOldProt);
			} else {
				("Failed to unprotect the memory area");
		} else {
			OutputDebugString("This has been already hooked");

Solution #2: Limitations

Although the second solution seems to be more convincing and accurate, it is possible that the internal implementation of interface will be changed in the future.

Also, it is worth noting that I tested the second solution on systems which have IE6, IE7, IE8 and IE9. (It works well on all released IE versions with Windows XP and 7.) In all tests, the second solution perfectly achieved what we want without any minor errors. As well, it is difficult to imagine the changes of fundamentals of Internet Explorer. However, no one can still say it will not be changed.

Therefore, to avoid possible errors in the new version of Internet Explorer, you should verify that the method and interface is using the TearoffThunk12 function. This can be done by comparing the above disassembled code with the code in memory.

Points of Interest

There are a number of articles on this topic (intercepting something). However, as far as I know, most of them do not cover very complex practical examples. For example, intercepting COM methods were introduced several years ago. However, I was not able to find any article or thread which covers what I presented in this article.

In this article, you can get how the complex and practical COM component (e.g. tear-off interface) works. Also, you will be familiar with the basic concept of intercepting COM components. Lastly, this article also covers how to use a debugger to find out what happened in your application.

Software Based on this Technique

As I stated in the above section, I started solving this problem in order to write my application. I am distributing the application which uses this technique on my website (
Specifically, the name of application is 'C Browser(See Browser)' and it incapacitates some functional restriction scripts.


[1] Volodymyr Shamray, Interception Calls to COM Interfaces
[2] Galen C. Hunt, Michael L. Scott. Intercepting and Instrumenting COM Applications
[3] Zhefu Zhang, COM Interface Hooking and Its Application - Part I
[4] Martin Mueller, Hooking a DirectX/COM Interface
[5], Disable mouse right-click
[6] Andrew Whitechapel, ATL Tear-Off Interfaces


  • Dec 15, 2011
    • Added test results on IE8 (It works well)
    • Typos and errors in the article were corrected
  • Dec 12, 2011
    • First release


This article, along with any associated source code and files, is licensed under The Code Project Open License (CPOL)


About the Author

Yonghwi Kwon
United States United States
I started to write software since 1999 and have developed various products including security solutions and system utilities.

Microsoft Visual C++ MVP
Assistant Professor at the University of Virginia

Comments and Discussions

QuestionNice Article Pin
HamidYaseen3-Jan-14 16:18
professionalHamidYaseen3-Jan-14 16:18 
QuestionIE11 And Enhanced Protection Mode Pin
Ehsan A Samani18-Dec-13 20:18
professionalEhsan A Samani18-Dec-13 20:18 
QuestionHookInterface3 doesn't seem to work on Win7+IE9 Pin
simonchen.net15-May-12 4:40
Membersimonchen.net15-May-12 4:40 
AnswerRe: HookInterface3 doesn't seem to work on Win7+IE9 Pin
Yonghwi Kwon17-May-12 16:47
MemberYonghwi Kwon17-May-12 16:47 
GeneralRe: HookInterface3 doesn't seem to work on Win7+IE9 Pin
simonchen.net18-May-12 21:00
Membersimonchen.net18-May-12 21:00 
GeneralRe: HookInterface3 doesn't seem to work on Win7+IE9 Pin
Yonghwi Kwon10-Jul-12 7:24
MemberYonghwi Kwon10-Jul-12 7:24 
GeneralMy vote of 3 Pin
JBoschen20-Dec-11 10:20
MemberJBoschen20-Dec-11 10:20 
GeneralRe: My vote of 3 Pin
Yonghwi Kwon20-Dec-11 14:26
MemberYonghwi Kwon20-Dec-11 14:26 
Questionmy vote of #5 Pin
BillWoodruff20-Dec-11 1:36
mveBillWoodruff20-Dec-11 1:36 
AnswerRe: my vote of #5 Pin
Yonghwi Kwon20-Dec-11 2:30
MemberYonghwi Kwon20-Dec-11 2:30 
GeneralMy vote of 5 Pin
Ștefan-Mihai MOGA16-Dec-11 3:57
professionalȘtefan-Mihai MOGA16-Dec-11 3:57 
GeneralRe: My vote of 5 Pin
Yonghwi Kwon16-Dec-11 13:22
MemberYonghwi Kwon16-Dec-11 13:22 
QuestionWicked sick Pin
abdurahman ibn hattab16-Dec-11 0:59
Memberabdurahman ibn hattab16-Dec-11 0:59 
AnswerRe: Wicked sick Pin
Yonghwi Kwon16-Dec-11 1:28
MemberYonghwi Kwon16-Dec-11 1:28 
GeneralMy vote of 5 Pin
JWhattam15-Dec-11 11:44
MemberJWhattam15-Dec-11 11:44 
GeneralRe: My vote of 5 Pin
Yonghwi Kwon15-Dec-11 13:31
MemberYonghwi Kwon15-Dec-11 13:31 
GeneralMy vote of 5 Pin
vbfengshui13-Dec-11 6:48
Membervbfengshui13-Dec-11 6:48 
GeneralRe: My vote of 5 Pin
Yonghwi Kwon13-Dec-11 8:45
MemberYonghwi Kwon13-Dec-11 8:45 

General General    News News    Suggestion Suggestion    Question Question    Bug Bug    Answer Answer    Joke Joke    Praise Praise    Rant Rant    Admin Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.