|
|
|
|
|
|
That's actually quite amusing.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
I'm still chuckling.
I need to get out more.
Oh.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
argh - we've doubled up - I'll delete my report - it seems we like typing at the same time
|
|
|
|
|
Spammer terminated. Noddy will not be pleased.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
| .
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
Both spammers terminated.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
| .
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 and #23 are gone.
"Five fruits and vegetables a day? What a joke!
Personally, after the third watermelon, I'm full."
|
|
|
|
|
Only my view, please don't take it to start a discussion.
From my own experience I think, ban a member like Bram van Kampen - Professional Profile[^] should be _only_ the responsibility of the site operators.
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry but (as usual) I don't agree.
The guy is here more than long enough to know where the limits are. Has taken every try to warn him in that thread as a "What? I didn't do anything wrong" and then came again with the same insulting and trolling in the second part of the message.
The site operators will still have the last word anyways and can reinstate the account if they think a temporary ban is enough. But I think they won't because the guy is already known for beding the limits in several ocasions, and this time has gone a bit too far.
If you really think it is _only_ site admins responsibility, then summon Sean or Chris to have a look (although I suppose they have already or will do it anyways).
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Sorry but (as usual) I don't agree.
Not a problem, we are only discussing and share our own opinions.
Quote: If you really think it is _only_ site admins responsibility, then summon Sean or Chris to have a look (although I suppose they have already or will do it anyways).
No no! It is their job
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
0x01AA wrote: No no! It is their job
Yes, it is their job...
among creating new functionality, managing the infrastructure involved, hunting and fixing bugs and trying to keep everything running smooth so that we can enjoy this site.
Ah, and not to forget that they are humans too and have right to have private life and other things to do. And that they live in the other part of the world (compared to us) and there are some hours offset to our living cycles.
The biggest purpose of this concrete forum is that they trust us and delegate on us to keep the site clean so they don't have to read every one post every one thread posted here.
They have implemente the "@" summong exactly for the purpose to be able to call the attention of any user of the site (specially them) when appropiated.
If you really think it is _only_ their responsibility to handle about that user, you should summon them before the user gets nuked by the community. If you don't then you make your own comment / opinion / complain totally worthless, because by the time they read this messages (if they come here and read it), it will be more than late and then we will be in the situation I previously stated: they still have the last word and can reinstate if they want to.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 26-Apr-20 14:10pm.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
