|
So do I. (VC++).
On a collaborative project with many contractors, dev suite and target OS were "hardwired" in interface documents so we keep on making fixes (from time to time) with VC++ 6.0 to avoid huge regression testing on the whole system...
|
|
|
|
|
It probably won't come as too much of a surprise that I've currently got all of the following installed on my laptop, given that we support add-ins for them:
- eMbedded Visual C++ 4.0
- Visual C++ 6.0
- Visual Studio .NET 2002
- Visual Studio .NET 2003
- Visual Studio 2005
- Visual Studio 2008
That list came very close to having Visual C++ 5.0 added to it a couple of weeks back too.
eMbedded Visual C++ 3.0 is another one we would consider adding if someone asks for it, too.
|
|
|
|
|
Anna-Jayne Metcalfe wrote: - eMbedded Visual C++ 4.0
You've got me beat by only one on the MS side.
But since I have an equal smattering of non-MS compilers, I think it balances out.
_________________________
Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau.
Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)
|
|
|
|
|
I'm sure it does.
|
|
|
|
|
could they be installed in the same machine? or you run them in virtual machine?
i would like to install vs2008 in my pc with vs2005 but i fear that this would bring me problems....
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, they can. I've not had any problems running them side by side.
The only interaction we've seen was between VC6 and eVC4, but unless you're doing something pretty exotic with add-ins you aren't likely to run into it.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you very much!
now i should update my survey response!
not only vs2005
but vs2005/vs2008
|
|
|
|
|
I am also using (Nearly) the full set...
At home...
Visual Studio 2008 Beta 2
Visual Studio 2005 Express editions
At work...
Visual Studio 2005
Visual Studio .NET 2002
Visual Studio .NET 2003
Visual Studio 6
*jaans
|
|
|
|
|
I left a company a few years ago and have been brought back as a contractor a few times to add some modifications to existing code. So Visual C/C++ 1.52 is technically still on my list. I do not have anything above 2003, but I still have QuickC around here some place.
INTP
"Program testing can be used to show the presence of bugs, but never to show their absence."Edsger Dijkstra
|
|
|
|
|
...it was fun. Now all my projects have been migrated to VS2005.
|
|
|
|
|
Rob Caldecott wrote: ...it was fun. Now all my projects have been migrated to VS2005.
You are lucky, I still have one.
_________________________
Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau.
Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)
|
|
|
|
|
How about the .NET Command Prompt which opens up more power unrestricted for those who want do delve into the details and play with the various command line switches? A few of the csc switches, I am sure are not exposed and supported within the context of IDE right?
|
|
|
|
|
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar wrote: How about the .NET Command Prompt which opens up more power
But that's "soooo" Unix.
|
|
|
|
|
You got to live with only command prompts when there are servers in which you have to operate upon. Servers, in most cases, don't have Visual IDEs installed for security reasons. Isn't it?
|
|
|
|
|
Nah, it's DOS.
I mostly use CSC because it doesn't require project and solution files and needless subdirectories.
I only use VS when doing WinForms.
|
|
|
|
|
True. Also, CSC is bit smarter that you need not mention the standard assemblies in the r switch right? When we try VBC, I think it makes a bit more complex anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
I've got to ask the question, with +-26% of respondents using VS2003, how the hell can MS not support it on Vista?
Now granted, I'm on the verge of rolling back to XP, but it seems crazy.
|
|
|
|
|
It does. We have some major problems with using VS2005 for add-in development, and the two issues together are causing us some real headaches.
|
|
|
|
|
I have VS2003, VC# 2005 Express and VS 2008 Beta 2 installed on a Vista HOme Premium laptop. Vista gave an initial warning about the issues that it has with VS2003, but I have been running it under the administrator setting and it has been behaving itself sofar.
I have also had all 3 open at the same time (slighty confusing as t which example I have open it which version
Francois
Francois Benadie
|
|
|
|
|