Survey Results

FirstPrev Next

Re: 1.8% Anna-Jayne Metcalfe17-Sep-07 19:10 Anna-Jayne Metcalfe 17-Sep-07 19:10  It's down to 1.73% now. That just doesn't have the same ring to it, though. Anna Linting the day away Anna's Place | Tears and Laughter "If mushy peas are the food of the devil, the stotty cake is the frisbee of God" VS6 only for mainenance. jhwurmbach16-Sep-07 23:21 jhwurmbach 16-Sep-07 23:21  But I still need it every now and then. Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not money, I am become as a sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal. George Orwell, "Keep the Aspidistra Flying", Opening words Re: VS6 only for mainenance. jpoggio17-Sep-07 21:32 jpoggio 17-Sep-07 21:32  So do I. (VC++). On a collaborative project with many contractors, dev suite and target OS were "hardwired" in interface documents so we keep on making fixes (from time to time) with VC++ 6.0 to avoid huge regression testing on the whole system... (Nearly) the full set... Anna-Jayne Metcalfe16-Sep-07 22:47 Anna-Jayne Metcalfe 16-Sep-07 22:47  It probably won't come as too much of a surprise that I've currently got all of the following installed on my laptop, given that we support add-ins for them: - eMbedded Visual C++ 4.0 - Visual C++ 6.0 - Visual Studio .NET 2002 - Visual Studio .NET 2003 - Visual Studio 2005 - Visual Studio 2008 That list came very close to having Visual C++ 5.0 added to it a couple of weeks back too. eMbedded Visual C++ 3.0 is another one we would consider adding if someone asks for it, too. Anna Linting the day away Anna's Place | Tears and Laughter "If mushy peas are the food of the devil, the stotty cake is the frisbee of God" Re: (Nearly) the full set... El Corazon17-Sep-07 14:52 El Corazon 17-Sep-07 14:52  Anna-Jayne Metcalfe wrote: - eMbedded Visual C++ 4.0 You've got me beat by only one on the MS side. But since I have an equal smattering of non-MS compilers, I think it balances out. _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb) Re: (Nearly) the full set... Anna-Jayne Metcalfe17-Sep-07 22:24 Anna-Jayne Metcalfe 17-Sep-07 22:24  I'm sure it does. Anna Linting the day away Anna's Place | Tears and Laughter "If mushy peas are the food of the devil, the stotty cake is the frisbee of God" Re: (Nearly) the full set... giammin17-Sep-07 22:33 giammin 17-Sep-07 22:33  could they be installed in the same machine? or you run them in virtual machine? i would like to install vs2008 in my pc with vs2005 but i fear that this would bring me problems.... Re: (Nearly) the full set... Anna-Jayne Metcalfe18-Sep-07 23:41 Anna-Jayne Metcalfe 18-Sep-07 23:41  Yes, they can. I've not had any problems running them side by side. The only interaction we've seen was between VC6 and eVC4, but unless you're doing something pretty exotic with add-ins you aren't likely to run into it. Anna Linting the day away Anna's Place | Tears and Laughter "If mushy peas are the food of the devil, the stotty cake is the frisbee of God" Re: (Nearly) the full set... giammin20-Sep-07 5:07 giammin 20-Sep-07 5:07  Thank you very much! now i should update my survey response! not only vs2005 but vs2005/vs2008 Re: (Nearly) the full set... J a a n s18-Sep-07 22:27 J a a n s 18-Sep-07 22:27  I am also using (Nearly) the full set... At home... Visual Studio 2008 Beta 2 Visual Studio 2005 Express editions At work... Visual Studio 2005 Visual Studio .NET 2002 Visual Studio .NET 2003 Visual Studio 6 *jaans Re: (Nearly) the full set... John R. Shaw20-Sep-07 20:04 John R. Shaw 20-Sep-07 20:04  I left a company a few years ago and have been brought back as a contractor a few times to add some modifications to existing code. So Visual C/C++ 1.52 is technically still on my list. I do not have anything above 2003, but I still have QuickC around here some place. INTP "Program testing can be used to show the presence of bugs, but never to show their absence."Edsger Dijkstra Goodbye VS6... Rob Caldecott16-Sep-07 22:37 Rob Caldecott 16-Sep-07 22:37  ...it was fun. Now all my projects have been migrated to VS2005. Re: Goodbye VS6... El Corazon17-Sep-07 14:54 El Corazon 17-Sep-07 14:54  Rob Caldecott wrote: ...it was fun. Now all my projects have been migrated to VS2005. You are lucky, I still have one. _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb) How about the .NET Command Prompt? Vasudevan Deepak Kumar16-Sep-07 21:20 Vasudevan Deepak Kumar 16-Sep-07 21:20  How about the .NET Command Prompt which opens up more power unrestricted for those who want do delve into the details and play with the various command line switches? A few of the csc switches, I am sure are not exposed and supported within the context of IDE right? Vasudevan Deepak Kumar Personal Homepage Tech Gossips Re: How about the .NET Command Prompt? Nemanja Trifunovic17-Sep-07 1:54 Nemanja Trifunovic 17-Sep-07 1:54  Vasudevan Deepak Kumar wrote: How about the .NET Command Prompt which opens up more power But that's "soooo" Unix. Programming Blog utf8-cpp Re: How about the .NET Command Prompt? Vasudevan Deepak Kumar17-Sep-07 5:12 Vasudevan Deepak Kumar 17-Sep-07 5:12  You got to live with only command prompts when there are servers in which you have to operate upon. Servers, in most cases, don't have Visual IDEs installed for security reasons. Isn't it? Vasudevan Deepak Kumar Personal Homepage Tech Gossips Re: How about the .NET Command Prompt? PIEBALDconsult17-Sep-07 7:05 PIEBALDconsult 17-Sep-07 7:05  Nah, it's DOS. I mostly use CSC because it doesn't require project and solution files and needless subdirectories. I only use VS when doing WinForms. Re: How about the .NET Command Prompt? Vasudevan Deepak Kumar20-Sep-07 20:53 Vasudevan Deepak Kumar 20-Sep-07 20:53  True. Also, CSC is bit smarter that you need not mention the standard assemblies in the r switch right? When we try VBC, I think it makes a bit more complex anyway. Vasudevan Deepak Kumar Personal Homepage Tech Gossips VS2003 vs Vista SimonS16-Sep-07 19:26 SimonS 16-Sep-07 19:26  I've got to ask the question, with +-26% of respondents using VS2003, how the hell can MS not support it on Vista? Now granted, I'm on the verge of rolling back to XP, but it seems crazy. Cheers, Simon > company:: Broken Keyboards Software > VS add for delicious BKS-Delicious > skype :: SimonMStewart > CV :: PDF Re: VS2003 vs Vista Anna-Jayne Metcalfe16-Sep-07 22:49 Anna-Jayne Metcalfe 16-Sep-07 22:49  It does. We have some major problems with using VS2005 for add-in development, and the two issues together are causing us some real headaches. Anna Linting the day away Anna's Place | Tears and Laughter "If mushy peas are the food of the devil, the stotty cake is the frisbee of God" Re: VS2003 vs Vista Francois Benadie21-Sep-07 10:22 Francois Benadie 21-Sep-07 10:22  I have VS2003, VC# 2005 Express and VS 2008 Beta 2 installed on a Vista HOme Premium laptop. Vista gave an initial warning about the issues that it has with VS2003, but I have been running it under the administrator setting and it has been behaving itself sofar. I have also had all 3 open at the same time (slighty confusing as t which example I have open it which version Francois Francois Benadie .NET 2003 and .NET 2005 we all used justin10816-Sep-07 18:03 justin108 16-Sep-07 18:03  The First one.

Last Visit: 31-Dec-99 18:00     Last Update: 21-Jun-24 11:48 Refresh ᐊ Prev123

General    News    Suggestion    Question    Bug    Answer    Joke    Praise    Rant    Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.