|
Speed has improved. RSS feeds via Google Reader are excellent although sometimes it is quicker to click the Google Reader link to a Lounge posting than to navigate to the Lounge from other forums. And I appreciate the "irony" comment on some error pages.
From time to time, when viewing an article in a new tab (mainly Firefox) it forgets by login status in the new tab but continues with my correct login status from the preceding tab.
modified 1-Aug-19 21:02pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard A. Abbott wrote: From time to time, when viewing an article in a new tab (mainly Firefox) it forgets by login status in the new tab
Hmm.
Do you open a new tab from a link on a current page, or open a new tab then go to the site directly by typing the address in the address bar?
When you refresh does it pick up your sign on?
Do you have "remember me" checked when you log on?
Are you waiting a good amount of time (over 20 mins) between viewing a page and opening a new tab from a link from that page?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I usually login from a button on the toolbar, or if I am ONLY using Google Reader, the lounge posting link, both no problems there.
From home page, I can right click and send to new tab an article for viewing. Intermittently, I get the warning that you must login, refreshing page in new tab don't help. Yet from the home page in the preceding tab I can navigate to any forum without loss of login status even if I right click and send to new tab any links on sidebars.
As said, it is intermittent.
Chris Maunder wrote: Do you have "remember me" checked when you log on?
Yes
Chris Maunder wrote: Are you waiting a good amount of time (over 20 mins) between viewing a page and opening a new tab from a link from that page?
No, not usually.
modified 1-Aug-19 21:02pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I haven't had an error page come up, but the speed is still a bit dodgy during peak hours, but it has definitely improved.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: 1 = Not so Good, 5 = Going Well So Far
I have two systems: one at work, the other at home.
At work: Going well so far. The speed is good. And clicking the Lounge main link won't give me an ASP error now.
Regarding to the clipboard issue, I will ask the IT guys at my company today.
At home: I have to verify tonight. The 10 Mbps DSL connection doesn't look like 10 Mbps. Accessing CP at home has been very slow these months. But it is fast while accessing other sites. Maybe it is because of poor routing to CP.
Maxwell Chen
|
|
|
|
|
Its been good as gold only I cant email people with the email link in a post
|
|
|
|
|
Chris,
Great job ! Speed is good for me. Message boards loads much faster than ASP version. But the HTML tags showing in mails (message board reply) still exist.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris,
First, we should all appreciate you and your team for the real hard work and countless sleepless nights you guys have put in and that too during the New Year Seasons in bringing in the best possible user experience in the website, patiently listening to the zillions of emails that kept pounding your SMTP hamster.
The speed and performance has definitely improved in good leaps and bounds in relative to what it had been during the stage of deployment.
Instead of just voting your Feedback in beguile mundane arithmetic figures like 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5, we wish you good luck in more success in bringing more features and enriching experience at http://www.codeproject.com/[^]
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage
Tech Gossips
A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis Levinson
|
|
|
|
|
|
The slowness is sporadic or the number online being < 9000 is sporadic?
I'm in Australia at the moment and the site is blazingly fast for me. 
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry - re-reading my post just now and I realize it made no sense.
The site performance is *much* better in the past few weeks, than it was right after conversion. Main page loading speed of < 3 seconds and lounge loading in < 5 seconds is typical now. However, from time to time, page loading takes > 40 seconds. I have seen this happen (again, in the past few weeks) at different times during the day - I don't think it is directly related to the number online.
I think the real test will come when the number online gets up to 15,000 - which was quite common last year.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Han - that's reassuring.
I've been watching with user numbersaround 15K and it seems still nice and snappy but yes - we'll let time test it properly.
We're still seeing a few timeouts occasionally but Dmitry's working like a bandit on a new system that will increase our database capacity significantly. However, timeouts make up less than 0.008% of all database calls so it's pretty good, though not perfect.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: We're still seeing a few timeouts
Do you just record timeouts, or do you also record very long page loads?
|
|
|
|
|
Both
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
It still stalls occasionally (mainly when posting) but no more than hte old site did at this point.
Otherwise [Microsoft is] toast in the long term no matter how much money they've got. They would be already if the Linux community didn't have it's head so firmly up it's own command line buffer that it looks like taking 15 years to find the desktop.
-- Matthew Faithfull
|
|
|
|
|
CP now seems pretty good from the UK, about as fast as it was before the upgrade, still the occasional blank page/error but only about once a day at the peak time. I haven't tried posting any articles since the upgrade but I guess you've go that under control now. All in all a great job 
Nothing is exactly what it seems but everything with seems can be unpicked.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hello. Recently, perhaps due to these cold winter days, CP has received many many articles, aimed only to show one or two features about a language, or an algorithm to accomplish a simple task, etc. While these contents are (IMO) not suitable for an entire article, sometimes I find the approach useful. So, I would suggest to add a "snippet" section so that these content could be added. It wouldn't count as an article, but maybe having a repository of snippets would 1) avoid simple articles to be posted and 2) those contents would still find a place within CP.
What do you think?
Stupidity is an International Association - Enrique Jardiel Poncela
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I don't think we need a new category of publications here, with it's own lists, search
mechanism, etc.
I don't care much about the length of an article; the length should be what it deserves to be.
if all it takes is 10 lines of code, and 3 lines of text, so be it.
I do not like however the recent articles that forget to either adapt or delete the
standard texts (as in "Using the code: A brief description of how to use the article or code.
The class names, the methods and properties, any tricks or tips. ...").
|
|
|
|
|
It's not about the length of the article, rather because of the content. With a snippet, you pinpoint exactly one problem and how to solve it, say, how to use the ::ShellExecuteEx API call. It wouldn't be necessary to write an article on all the shell functions or related stuff. Another example:
=====
How to iterate over a vector in the C++ way:
vector<int> vtr;
...fill the vector...
for (vector<int>::iterator i = vtr.begin();
i != vtr.end();
++i)
{
cout << *i << endl;
}
</int></int>
1. begin points to the first element of the iterators.
2. end points to past the end of the elements.
3. pre-increment is preferred over post-increment because optimization issues.
4. De-referencing the iterator will give you the value of the container.
=====
This is an example of what I do have in mind. Something simple, something fast, that people can simply understand, copy and paste into their codes. An article would have to include an explanation about containers, iterators, why to use this or that approach, etc. A snippet would be something simple and fast.
In such way, many articles (like the recently posted) could fit into this category.
Stupidity is an International Association - Enrique Jardiel Poncela
|
|
|
|
|
Fernando A. Gomez F. wrote: 3. pre-increment is preferred over post-increment because optimization issues.
Is this true of modern compilers? It strikes me as rather bizarre that in simple cases that the optimizer would handle the two differently.
Otherwise [Microsoft is] toast in the long term no matter how much money they've got. They would be already if the Linux community didn't have it's head so firmly up it's own command line buffer that it looks like taking 15 years to find the desktop.
-- Matthew Faithfull
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I just repeated what it was stated in "The C++ Standard Library" by Nicolai Josuttis. I've always do pre-increment. At any rate, this was only meant to provide an example on how a snippet could look like.
Stupidity is an International Association - Enrique Jardiel Poncela
|
|
|
|
|
There already are all kinds of articles: tutorials, technology reviews, stories,
functional solutions, technical solutions, etc. I see no objective to having
articles on code snippets. I'm not in favor of more categories. If anything, I would
predefine and add some more keywords for easier searching the entire article base.
|
|
|
|
|
This has been suggested by several people and is "on the list" according to Chris.
|
|
|
|
|
This is in the works.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
