|
Hi Chris,
Happy to hear, it kinda sorted out. But it still does not sounds completely correct to me.
Can you, please, send me a screenshot, when the list is empty. I would like to see the filter setting on that image.
Send it to elina at codeproject, please.
Sincerely,
Elina
Life is great!!!
Enjoy every moment of it! 
|
|
|
|
|
I got your screen shots and the source file. Thanks.
This happens on IE 6 only. IE 7 and FF are fine
I am opening the bug, and we will deal with it ASAP.
Will keep you updated. Thanks again for reporting and sorry for inconvenience
Sincerely,
Elina
Life is great!!!
Enjoy every moment of it!
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Elina. Good to know that it's something you can take a look at. 
Chris Meech
I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar]
In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. [Yogi Berra]
|
|
|
|
|
All fixed.
All Thanks belong to Thiru
Sincerely,
Elina
Life is great!!!
Enjoy every moment of it!
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Elina, and to Thiru also. Works great now! Appreciate the help.
Chris Meech
I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar]
In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. [Yogi Berra]
|
|
|
|
|
The pleasure all ours
Sincerely,
Elina
Life is great!!!
Enjoy every moment of it!
|
|
|
|
|
Is there a reason my side menu is now firmly stuck on the top of the content, I know it is possible I did something but I would really like to undo it and can't figure out where the something is.
Now Chris if it was you just frakkin around with the screen LEAVE THE BLOODY THING ALONE.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Which browser?
Have you Ctrl+F5'd?
We've been trying to sort out a specific problem with floating elements and IE6. It's like playing whack-a-mole.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I am using IE6 and FF 3.# at the office, it is definitely environmental as my profile does not affect the home system, it's using Chrome and IE8 and they work fine.
I will try the ctrl F5 on Monday. Sooner or later they will allow us to move off IE6 in the office (I use FF illegally) but I'm not counting on it.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
|
I always thought there was a stutter in C++, now you have proof.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
I only read code that is properly formatted, adding PRE tags is the easiest way to obtain that. [The QA section does it automatically now, I hope we soon get it on regular forums as well]
|
|
|
|
|
I don't believe you, you must have downloaded the HTML and modified it yourself then took a screenshot. 
Ok, ok, I believe you. It wasn't (just) because you were drunk that you saw it before. Nice find.
Also, "Angel Eyes- The love"... wonder what that is. Hmm...
|
|
|
|
|
aspdotnetdev wrote: Also, "Angel Eyes- The love"... wonder what that is. Hmm...
Yea that would look odd..
That's my girlfriend
|
|
|
|
|
harold aptroot wrote: aspdotnetdev wrote:
Also, "Angel Eyes- The love"... wonder what that is. Hmm...
Yea that would look odd..
That's my girlfriend
sure it is, sure it is...
Panic, Chaos, Destruction.
My work here is done.
|
|
|
|
|
I guess that's the best I could come up with? 
(btw her whole MSN name is "Angel Eyes- The love we give away is the only love we keep.")
|
|
|
|
|
harold aptroot wrote: (btw her whole MSN name is "Angel Eyes- The love we give away is the only love we keep.")
Way, way TMI.
Panic, Chaos, Destruction.
My work here is done.
|
|
|
|
|
Ok honestly though, we (me and her, not you) are probably going to get engaged soon (this summer or so) so keep reading the Lounge! (or not, if you don't care lol)
@others: sorry for going offtopic so far
|
|
|
|
|
Awww - good luck mate ![Rose | [Rose]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)
Dave
BTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)
Why are you using VB6? Do you hate yourself? (Christian Graus)
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Does she know? If not you should remember that a proposal should include a diamond ring and not a couple of roofies in her drink.
Panic, Chaos, Destruction.
My work here is done.
|
|
|
|
|
I have another suggestion:
Quick answers shouldn't have a voting range from 1 to 5. It should either be "Yes" that answered my question or "No" it did not.
The reason:
A follow-up question was posted to one of my answers, and I answered the posters follow up question (at least, I thought I did). My answer was voted 3 with no reason as to why a "3". I answered the question and the answer I provided was completely accurate.
I tell my kids this all the time ... If you ask a question and I answer it, you either understand the answer or you don't. If you don't understand the answer, then I didn't answer your question, so tell me I Don't understand, and I'll try to rephrase my answer so you can better understand it, don't say "I think I get it", when you don't really.
The same rules apply here ... you either understand my answer, and therefore "Yes" I have answered your question or you do not understand or I have not answered the question, so therefore "No" I have not answered the question.
Maybe you need: Yes this answers my question, I don't understand the answer, rephrase, or "NO" this did not answer the original question.
Honestly, voting levels of 1-5 are so meaningless here ...
That's my two cents,
D.
|
|
|
|
|
I strongly disagree. An answer can be correct but incomplete; it can be an attempt to be complete but partly incorrect; it can be correct, complete and suboptimal, etc etc. So I would vote it 3 if that is what it deserves, and certainly not a 5 if and when it looks good but I think I have a better answer.
IMO all "good question/bad question" and "good answer/bad answer" votes should go, they all deserve a scale so one can quantify how good/how bad things are.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
I only read code that is properly formatted, adding PRE tags is the easiest way to obtain that. [The QA section does it automatically now, I hope we soon get it on regular forums as well]
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: An answer can be correct but incomplete; it can be an attempt to be complete but partly incorrect; it can be correct, complete and suboptimal, etc etc.
Partial answers do not answer the question.
Using your method, someone gives you a partial answer, you vote a 3. The person that gave the answer is left wondering "What the heck does that mean? I answered the question". Do you not like the answer I gave? Did you not like the wording? Was it not complete (perhaps the individual that posted the answer thought it was complete), are you just being a dork, and voted me a 3 just because?
If the person asking the question doesn't provide any form of feedback, it leaves the person that answered the question in a position to have to go ask them "Why'd you vote me a '3'", and then wait for a response, etc..etc..etc...
It's just too vague.
|
|
|
|
|
Douglas Troy wrote: someone gives you a partial answer, you vote a 3
Nope. First, I don't ask much questions, I answer a lot. If I were to ask something, and get a partial answer, I would judge it on its merits and probably vote 2 or 4 or not at all.
When someone asks a question and gets a partial answer, I will provide the full answer if I can, and I will vote if I feel a need to; I will explain my vote if it isn't obvious already from other replies that something is wrong, missing, or suboptimal. I will feel a need to vote if someone gets a partial or a partially wrong answer, and that answer gets voted 1 or 5; I will immediately vote the opposite to counteract the wrong vote, wrong IMO at least. If in a 1-or-5 world that results in an average of 3, I can't help that.
Douglas Troy wrote: Partial answers do not answer the question.
So if you ask a question and get a partial, clear and correct, although incomplete, answer, will you down-vote the answer in your black-and-white world?
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
I only read code that is properly formatted, adding PRE tags is the easiest way to obtain that. [The QA section does it automatically now, I hope we soon get it on regular forums as well]
modified on Thursday, January 28, 2010 6:11 PM
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: So if you ask a question and get a partial, clear and correct, although incomplete, answer, will you down-vote the answer in your black-and-white world?
I was waiting for you to say something along the lines of black-and-white, or absolutes, etc..etc.. ... but Chris has pointed out that there is an accept answer, which changes the game a bit (I had not noticed that ... gee .. the world's NOT black-and-white, sometimes it has bright yellow boxes around it too!).
I realize, of course, the world is certainly not black-and-white, even though there are many things in software development that are ... but people are voting answers to questions 3's, 4's and not stating why. So as a person that's trying to help these people find a solution, when something like that happens, it leaves me wondering what it is about the solution I offered them that was, to uses Chris' own words here, "Suboptimal".
To me it's rather like if I walk up to you and ask a question, you give me an answer that you know will work, and I say thank you. Then I ask a follow-up question, you give me yet another answer, and then I say "meh" and just walk off ...
Don't you think you'd be left there thinking "WTF was that about?" I know I would.
So I guess I'm just going to have to ask them 'why' when they vote low.
BTW - I've seen people vote a '1' to a person's follow-up question, when I thought they're follow-up question made sense ... being that they didn't have the slightest clue to begin with, which is why they were asking a question in the first place. Same kind of thing in reverse, and it makes no sense to me either.
We'll see what happens when I start asking "why"
Thank you for your opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
