|
Why not just use tags like SSIS, SSRS, etc? If CP littered the categories with every technology out there then I think articles would be difficult to find or manage.
|
|
|
|
|
Follwing this thread[^], and shamelessly stealing the idea, I would suggest replacing the [Message automatically removed] by [Message sunshined] or [Message elephanted] or [Message sunshine elephanted] (c) @walterhevedeich
~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
Do not feed the troll ! - Common proverb
|
|
|
|
|
Or a nice litte "Null(Content)ReferenceException"? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'll get right on that...
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
If that's how you make bug reports I feel sorry for your dev team 
Maybe describe what the problem is? I see a picture and some stuff you've highlighted with your mouse, whatever "bug" you are describing is not apparent by the picture.
|
|
|
|
|
The code goes over the article info box.
Keep Clam And Proofread
--
√(-1) 23 ∑ π...
And it was delicious.
|
|
|
|
|
Found a way to reproduce it: you need to select some file, then put mouse over the stars for voting. Sometimes thie effect appeared, sometimes not
|
|
|
|
|
Which browser?
Keep Clam And Proofread
--
√(-1) 23 ∑ π...
And it was delicious.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh sorry, i'm terribly sorry!
Was in a hurry, so i had no time to write a good bug report.
It maybe too late now, but my browser is Chrome 29.0.1547.76 m
Sorry again for i wasn't responding, for some reason i didn't get any email notifications 
|
|
|
|
|
This article http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?waid=91884&aid=648858[^] is in the moderation queue, and when you click on it you get the normal approval header, but with
This is an old version of the currently published article above it.
If you click on the "currently published" link, you get to the article, but with a header:
There is a version that is ready for approval by the community. Would you like to view or edit it?
Click on the "view" link, and you're back to the moderation queue version with its link to where you just came from! 
Sorry, no pictures, I'm on my tablet and can't remember how to takes them... 
This message is manufactured from fully recyclable noughts and ones. To recycle this message, please separate into two tidy piles, and take them to your nearest local recycling centre.
Please note that in some areas noughts are always replaced with zeros by law, and many facilities cannot recycle zeroes - in this case, please bury them in your back garden and water frequently.
|
|
|
|
|
I have seen this as well (and tried explaining it a few posts down). However, I did not see the message you describe on the currently posted article about a new version being in the moderation queue.
[EDIT]
I suspect I don't see the message on the currently published article because I don't have privileges to edit the article.
[/EDIT]
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
The "there is a newer version" one I can understand - it takes time both to get through the moderation queue and to synchronize the database across gawd-knows how many DB servers the hamsters are running at the moment! Get the wrong couple of minutes, and the article can be approved and out of the queue before the web servers have finished serving the page.
But for that to link to a published version, which links back to the unpublished version even now (over 25 minutes after I first noticed it) means that the synchronisation has gone via Columbia, then the moon, rattled around trying to find any acting ability in Nicholas Cage, given up and only then reported to the web page!
This message is manufactured from fully recyclable noughts and ones. To recycle this message, please separate into two tidy piles, and take them to your nearest local recycling centre.
Please note that in some areas noughts are always replaced with zeros by law, and many facilities cannot recycle zeroes - in this case, please bury them in your back garden and water frequently.
|
|
|
|
|
It no longer shows up in the moderation queue. Does that mean they solved the Nicholas Cage puzzle?
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
I just provided a solution to a question in the C# Quick Answers. After accepting the solution, the UI seemed to display it as an answer, not a solution. I thought I'd made a mistake, so I deleted the answer and re-entered my solution (taking care to click the correct button). I ended up with 2 solutions, one deleted. 
How do I undelete a deleted solution (of which I'm the author)?
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
CPIAC2013[^]
I guess the info provided is not wrong anywhere in the timeline.
kinda pay back to CP!
Starting to think people post kid pics in their profiles because that was the last time they were cute - Jeremy.
|
|
|
|
|
How about a checkbox or filter (I think the current filters are inclusive not exclusive) to hide contest entries from the latest updates or latest articles?
I think a lot of good articles are getting buried by contest entries. I'm not really interested in reading a one or two paragraph contest entry, but I do want to read the articles. Its slightly annoying to have to dig back through a few pages of contest entries to find meaty articles.
Easy? Hard? Not sure, but I think it would be beneficial if it could be put in!
|
|
|
|
|
This is already meant to be happening.
Which page are you seeing this on?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
That moment when you think the OP is closeing your questions just for the fun of it. I'm sure that if a question is a question then a question is a question, huh. So if a question is closed then is it not a question? But if some one asks a question like "how do I do this?" Then I'm sure that it shouldn't get taken down, because its a question, jus the cause some one might not justify the question as good dosent mean it should be taken down, I think OP should leave it there for people to find and if there is no answers for that question, lets say 5days then it should be taken down, not on in the first 10mins, and also a post should not be taken down if there are answers on it, I would say that is slack, taking Down a question if it already had answers on it, come on, that answer may have been the answer to the question!.
Anyway sorry, that's me getting just getting frustrated at things, I thought I'd let you know.
|
|
|
|
|
Reminds me of a scene from Big Bang Theory:
Leonard: <Nonsensical spaghetti logic rant about Penny>
Sheldon: You're a lucky man Leonard.
Leonard: Why's that?
Sheldon: You're talking to one of 3 people in the western hemisphere capable of following that train of thought.
Leonard: So, what do you think?
Sheldon: I said I could follow it, not that I cared.
Don't worry Leonard, Sheldon is here
|
|
|
|
|
What? *Brain Overloads*
Keep Clam And Proofread
--
√(-1) 23 ∑ π...
And it was delicious.
|
|
|
|
|
Not all "how do I do this?" questions are equal.
"I need to write a website for my school project. How do I do this?"
or
"I'm trying to connect to a webservice, here's my code [...]. It keeps throwing error "...". How do I do this?"
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: I'm trying to connect to a webservice, here's my code [...]. It keeps throwing error
Still having problems with that web service I see. 
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
