|
One Problem with USB-drive and NTFS is: You also copy the NTFS ACL with the file.
If you plug the USB drive into another PC you might not be able to get access to the file unless you change the permissions of the file first.
An alternative would be, instead of reformatting the drive, if you're working with zip files anyway to let 7-zip (or any other zip tool) to split the zip file into multiple parts. Makes it easier to handle 
|
|
|
|
|
That's where I hit a problem with 7zip. I tried selecting the option to split the archive into 600MB CD chunks. 7zip, alas, barfed "Not implemented" at me. I know it's open source but I thought it would have been able to do it. WinRar does splitting as I recall but I think you have to pay for it?
Edit: I tried the split archive with 7zip here at work and it's works fine. Not sure why the same version on my home PC doesn't.
If there is one thing more dangerous than getting between a bear and her cubs it's getting between my wife and her chocolate.
|
|
|
|
|
That's odd, it worked for me
|
|
|
|
|
Harold, I just edited the previous reply. Works at office but not at home.
If there is one thing more dangerous than getting between a bear and her cubs it's getting between my wife and her chocolate.
|
|
|
|
|
IIRC you have to use the 7z format for it to work, maybe you had it set to something else?
|
|
|
|
|
I only ever use 7zip format because it compresses so much better than t'others.
If there is one thing more dangerous than getting between a bear and her cubs it's getting between my wife and her chocolate.
|
|
|
|
|
You could reformat it to NTFS (can be done with the command line tool "convert", which doesn't nuke your files), or use a "split archive" ("split to volumes" in 7zip) (I would choose this option)
|
|
|
|
|
SeptimusHedgehog 151576 wrote: Harold, you may well have explained it. What would you suggest?
If you don't want to go NTFS or just want to try the newest thing for kicks, try exFAT.
Michael Martin
Australia
"I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible."
- Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004
|
|
|
|
|
ExFAT. Never heard of that until now. Seems I've spent the last few years with my head up my ass.
If there is one thing more dangerous than getting between a bear and her cubs it's getting between my wife and her chocolate.
|
|
|
|
|
That's almost certainly the problem.
Do you have to use the file directly from the target disc, or can you split it up with a file splitter/WinRar/other archiver?
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a developer you should be able to write a rough 'linux split like' program in less than 10 minutes. 
Veni, vidi, vici.
|
|
|
|
|
FTFY. I've reinvented too many wheels in my lifetime. No matter how hard I try, they still keep coming out round. I've tried a few triangular wheels as well.
If there is one thing more dangerous than getting between a bear and her cubs it's getting between my wife and her chocolate.
|
|
|
|
|
SeptimusHedgehog 151576 wrote: I've reinvented too many wheels in my lifetime
I seem to be better at inventing punctures.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
From a command line:
convert [usb drive letter]: /fs:ntfs
If you want to be sure that you will not have access rights problems after that, you can give full access to everyone on the root.
You could also use a formatting tool for usb drives (I don't have a link, I just remember HP used to provide one - HP USB Formatting Tool), but formatting will erase everything that is already on the drive.
A gentleman is someone who can play the bag-pipe, and who does not.
|
|
|
|
|
If the file is marked as contiguous and there is insufficient contiguous space available, the copy will fail. You can get around this in several ways. My favorite is by putting it in a zip file and copying the zip file.
Windows 8 is the resurrected version of Microsoft Bob. The only thing missing is the Fisher-Price logo.
- Harvey
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some one said
Quote: "if your architecture is very simple ( in terms of developers will easily understand it) mean it very ordinary but if its complex ( That's mean complex architecture, not easy to understand, difficult to change) is best architecture."
I think architecture should be very simple and easy to understand, when you design an architecture that should be easy to implement, Secure (as Much as Required), easy to maintain, easy to change and up to the performance bench mark. 
what do you think?
Life is all about share and care...
public class Life : ICareable,IShareable
{
// implements yours...
}
|
|
|
|
|
All theory is gray. Do you really want to eliminate all the fun we have every day?
1) How do you otherwise want to show how smart you are and show the others where their place is?
2) How are you going to get rid of the large faction that still does not need or accept any architecture at all?
3) How do you intend to keep code Nazis and their conventions and checking tools off your back? Will you allow them to actually review your code instead of keeping them busy with some deliberate decoy to keep them busy (<.. a little too busy )? I use small, perfectly functional and readable loops using goto. There is absolutely nothing wrong with them and it takes the Nazis hours to 'convince' me that they have to be removed.
4) Are you really going to meet some manager's unrealistic expectations, only to get the bar raised yet higher next week?
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
I hold an A-7 computer expert classification, Commodore. I'm well acquainted with Dr. Daystrom's theories and discoveries. The basic design of all our ship's computers are JavaScript.
|
|
|
|
|
Given that whoever it was you quoted spoke in pre-school English, I'm somewhat surprised that he had anything at all to say about architecture -- unless, of course, he was talking about Lego.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
|
I actually met an architect once who referred to their architecture as Lego blocks which they could stack to build dream houses, but also boats etc..
In the end;
The boat sank & the dream house was too small for even a lego dummy.
Hope he didn't had the same when he grew up when he was playing with his own lego. He would have been bullied a lot
|
|
|
|
|
Suvabrata Roy wrote: what do you think?
That is about time for the machines to write their own code.
Microsoft ... the only place where VARIANT_TRUE != true
|
|
|
|
|
Veni, vidi, vici.
|
|
|
|
|
Not true.
The simplest architecture is monolithic code: spaghetti with some linguini and a little bit of fusilli added for good measure. And no-one with any experience of the real world will go with that for anything bigger than a throwaway application.
The architecture to use is the simplest that fits the application requirements: and that varies depending on what the application does, what language(s) it is coded in, and what it has to interface to. Perhaps also, the experience and quality of the developers. There is no one architecture which fits all circumstances, despite what the disciples of any one system will tell you.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
