|
OK - I got this:-
Sorry, no entries were found matching tags VB.NET, C++, C++/CLI, C, VC6, VC7, VC7.1, VC8.0, VC9.0, VC10.0, VC11.0, VC12.0 after I had previously been on the C++ articles tab so that seems to be the cause.
|
|
|
|
|
It no goes to this link: http://www.codeproject.com/script/Answers/Post.aspx?aid=[post-id][^] The page opens up is empty and (using new editor?). Also the green 'submit' button is wrong...
...30 minutes later...
Now the page displays the old editor and the button is back as before, it also displays the expected content (except preview which seems to be ages behind the editor). However the page looks like the 'ask a question' page and not the 'improve the question' as I remember it...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
modified 22-Jun-14 15:36pm.
|
|
|
|
|
It depends on the post.
A long, long time ago we allowed HTML posts in QA and so some old questions may have the old HTML format. I remember reasonably recently I put in place some code to ensure everything was converted to the text-with-HTML that we use. Clearly that 100% watertight code leaked.
Can you point me to the question that showed the WYSIWYG editor?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
You missed the point - for an half hour I saw an other page when hit 'improve' button. The page displayed the new editor, messed up with the submit button and didn't show the original content. After half an hour the editor was back to the old one, the button got fixed and content was in place...But! Now I get a side not with the 'A few simple rules when posting your question.' like I'm to post a new question and not editing it - that wasn't there before...
And it now happening me with all questions...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I've received a few comments and criticisms on my blog feeds because the readers believe they are full-fledged articles.
I write both articles and blog entries. I definitely do put more time in polishing the articles that I post.
While the blog entries are serial in nature, cover a small topic, and by themselves could appear to be incomplete.
Could the fact that an article originates from a blog be made a little more prominent in the display of these articles.
I like the feature of feeding my blog to CP and getting the extra readers, and I would like to continue to feed my posts here. However, I would prefer to discuss the technical content with the readers rather than trying to explain to them that it isn't an article.
|
|
|
|
|
It should be separated, in the moderation queue there are different tabs and in the item itself it should be a "type" on the upper right corner.
Is that mixing? If not... I think the readers should pay a bit more attention
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hello Team,
One of my friend
torakami.confidence@gmail.com is his Id.Please fix the problem so that he can continue with codeproject account.
Thanks Vinay
|
|
|
|
|
Your friend with Profile name torakami was reported being Abuse. His account is suspended.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the reply.
Is it possible to activate the account please.
Kind Regards,
Vinay
|
|
|
|
|
Vinay Sakpal wrote: Is it possible to activate the account please
Wait for Admins to respond. I don't see such possibility as your friend was given a chance.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
I am not sure if it is a bug or intentional, CodeProject is forgetting my filter setting too often. I have updated my filter several time this week.
I do not fear of failure. I fear of giving up out of frustration.
|
|
|
|
|
I used to be co-author for article Your Development Tools[^] starting from 26-Mar-14. However at some point my profile has vanished from the co-author list. If I try to add myself, I keep getting a generic, dictionary related error...
|
|
|
|
|
I can see you as co-editor this moment! All seems good...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: I can see you as co-editor this moment!
 I can't. So it seems that there was a short moment when the co-author info was present but vanished again for some reason....
|
|
|
|
|
Now I added some content to the article, added myself to co-author list and submitted the article. Then I realized I need to make more modifications, but when I try to edit the article, the editor is showing wrong version (44). That version does not contain the databases section I just added...
Really confused 
|
|
|
|
|
Now (at 22:30 on 21 of June 2014 - local time) I see you as co-editor, and I see a 'Databases' section with six entries (MariaDB, MySQL, Firebird, PostgreSQL, SQL Server Express Edition, Oracle Database Express Edition 11g Release 2). The current revision number is 45. Something is missing now?
If does you should call the hamsters to aid...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
What happens if you try to edit the article. Does the editor open with version containing the Databases section or with the previous one?
|
|
|
|
|
You right! While editing it looks like a different version. Without the 'Databases' section and without you...
I call upon @Sean-Ewington to help us fix it...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
