|
Paul M Watt wrote: GC would be removed
That would be a huge semantic change. There's nothing in the language to do deterministic memory collection.
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.-John Q. Adams
You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering.-Wernher von Braun
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.-Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
The creator of the Linux kernel and Git has said that security issues should be publicly disclosed, not swept under the rug where vendors can leave them unsolved for years. Isn't that the point of open source?
|
|
|
|
|
Everyone who is part of an organization — a company, a nonprofit, a condo board — has experienced the pathologies that can occur when human beings try to work together in groups. "None of us is as dumb as all of us"
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: "None of us is as dumb as all of us"
You nailed it!
Group-think! Ugh!
Obviously it's a good idea to gather good ideas, but nothing good is ever created by committee. Nothing.
Yes, I said nothing. 
Except maybe a spell checker.
2nd edit. wait I correctly spelled committee. So I stand by my original quote. Nothing good is ever created by committee. Not even spell checkers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yup, totally stolen.
Those folk are genius. Ineptitude[^] is right above my screen, trying (in vain) to improve me.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here's Another[^]
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.-John Q. Adams
You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering.-Wernher von Braun
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.-Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
LOL
I love it!
I've never seen it presented like that before.
|
|
|
|
|
You just identified one of the reasons I like to be a consultant -- it offers some measure of distance between me and "the team."
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Keeping a smartphone charged is a problem that has evaded researchers and the public in general for a number of years. As phones have gotten bigger and internals have become more power-hungry, living away from the power-socket has become a more unrealistic prospect with every passing month. No, Mr. Bond. I want you to energize.
|
|
|
|
|
Sharks with frickin' laser beams attached to their heads!
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Microsoft Research wants to charge your phone with lasers
This will work well for me, because I can shoot lasers out of my eyes.
It tooks years of practice and lots of headaches.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tech world is abuzz with interesting possibilities for the Internet of Things (IoT) lately, but regular folks haven’t caught up yet. Why the enthusiasm gap? Oh, you know. Things.
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe because no one asked for it? 
|
|
|
|
|
You didn't ask for your fridge to communicate directly with all local grocery stores? Luddite.
I know people have posted in other threads that IoT makes sense for industrial (non-consumer) scenarios, but we've always had that. We just called it embedded computing.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: your fridge
Came with the apartment. And it's pretty old; it ought to call the dump to be hauled away.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Improvement to quality of life is too marginal
[2] It is not a norm that manufacturers of home appliances expose the control interface through Wifi/Bluetooth/Zigbee/ZWave
[3] Security is also an issue. The kid next door may be adding too much sugar to your coffee.
|
|
|
|
|
Reality.
If you are to buy a new appliance, would you pay $100 more for some feature that requires compatibility with all some other appliances?
Show me a use-case where I would want to spend the money.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
For me there are different reasons.
1) Not all of us are in America.
By this I mean that many nations don't have widespread broadband Internet access, for example in order to have an Internet connection where I live it took me 8 years - I got the connection in 2014. Before I had to use GB-limited HSDPA pendrives, which were limited to GPRS speed due to low area coverage. Imagine a house connected at 20 kbps...
2) Privacy.
Maybe, I say maybe, I would like to be one of the few to know what's in my fridge. I'm not braindead enough to not know how to take care of my groceries. And why should I have a connected laundry-washer? It just doesn't make sense.
On this matter I recently bought a high-end BlueRay player and it automatically connects to my wifi - at least, it tries, since I removed the connection parameters. I decide when and how it should connect.
3) Usefulness.
They have none. Maybe the connected air-conditioner can be useful, but not enough to have security issues and spending good money on it.
Geek code v 3.12
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
I would prefer things ("hardware") with ability to run some of universal script, and also open API on what it can do (with library included). It would have some default options (factory settings) available for people who like it as it is. But it might be moddable by Internet modders (or me.. programmer) to create all kinds of crazy things. Like to turn on lights when clocks turn certain time in the morning and also start coffee machine if some conditions are fulfilled. Programmable open hardware. These preprogrammed one function (or choice of few usually completely useless or boring) supposedly "smart" things are not for me. I want to program (and debug) my home completely. It would be so much fun.. .. for me at least. 
|
|
|
|
|
Me
I don't like it
So you can't have it. 
|
|
|
|
|
That's a trick question, because it's already here.
The only thing is it's not "The Unified Internet of Interoperable and Artificially Intelligent Things" (UIoIaAIT)
-New Orleans uses a small mesh network to create a private network to administer and monitor their traffic cams.
-All of the integrated Smart Homes.
-Amazon.coms automated robot order fulfillment factories.
The most successful application has been as the Intranet of Things.
|
|
|
|
|
Listen schoolers and newbs alike, I've got 36 years of experience working with computers (since the Heathkit) and here's what my equally geeky girlfriend and I can tell you from personal experience:
Absolutely nothing is holding back the "Internet of Things". As a matter of fact it seems to be doing the opposite, holding back nothing but security and privacy, and creating according to an article I read recently, "smart" this's and that's's are rapidly increasingly becoming unwitting unsecured access points into personal and corporate networks. I mean anyone driving around with an Android looking at the list of network names that appear rather often can see the good number of routers named "Thermostat #7" or "HP Wireless Printer" or even sometimes "Soda Vending Machine #xxxx", etc.
I mean face it fellow geeks, given the current miserably deplorable state of the computing industry right now - blatant documented unfettered mass distributions of abominations of malware being sold and proliferated to unknowing, innocent public citizens by rogue constitutional-scoffing agents of the State known as Google, Facebook, Time Warner, Comcast, AT&T, T-Mobile, Samsung, ZTE, Motorola, HP, Adobe, Anroid, iOS not to mention organized crime networks (including advertising agencies), the NSA, the ruthless and spineless foreign "cyberterrorwar" governmental divisions and the ones who if they are so worried about being Anonymous then they probably should either go ahead and grow a pair of balls, show their f^cking faces and walk their talk or just get the f^ck off of the Internet period and seriously rethink their lives.
A computer to me is rapidly becoming a standalone desktop with no networking hardware, no hard drive, a read-only version of Linux running off of the DVD drive and a USB-port for a USB-powered pencil sharpener to sharpen the pencil that I will use on a a piece of paper to record any data or perform any kind of mathematical computation or write any kind of composition. A secure mobile phone is the fact of knowing how annd where you can let somebody know that you would like to meet them in person to grab a cup of coffee or a scone and catch up on each other.
Forget firewalls, AV tools, encryption, or any proper procedure, protocol, provision, etiquette, decorum - any of it - the Internet of Things is an Internet of Bullf^ckery.
Here's a few articles to sour your stomach with:
http://www.zdnet.com/article/the-microsoft-store-a-wretched-hive-of-scams-and-fake-apps/[^]
http://www.zdnet.com/article/google-triples-chrome-bug-bounty-rewards-to-15000/[^]
http://www.cso.com.au/article/564069/extortionists-becoming-more-helpful-new-ransomware-generation-bows/?utm_medium=www.cso.com.au&utm_source=article_body_related_article[^]
Cyberransomeware? This is what we have to look forward to in an Internet of Things? I'm ready to do a reverse cannonball into Walden's Pond myself... Who's with me...?
"... having only that moment finished a vigorous game of Wiff-Waff and eaten a tartiflet." - Henry Minute
"Let's face it, after Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says WTF!" - gavindon
Programming is a race between programmers trying to build bigger and better idiot proof programs, and the universe trying to build bigger and better idiots, so far... the universe is winning. - gavindon
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
