|
spam[^] mer[^]
Geek code v 3.12
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
I use 1TBS
modified 23-Mar-15 7:52am.
|
|
|
|
|
Spam removed.
Programmer : A machine that converts coffee into code !
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
King Fisher wrote: But the same happening in QA now
What exactly?
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your friend or you?
In the conversation you link to with Sergey you say it was you.
|
|
|
|
|
Not mine, my friend account was blocked.
My answer is reported as spam and one of ours advised that to stop answering old question and he said Is the OP still looking for answer ,then i said but this answer may helps others in future. 
Born To Learn
|
|
|
|
|
My opinion for that:
http://www.codeproject.com/suggestions.aspx?msg=4990852#xx4990852xx[^]
http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/4997968/Re-Should-we-warn-him.aspx[^]
In this case... I would say it is boundary. I don't care about the reputation of the member, but the intention of Sergey is not promoting another site, nor reputation hunting (he doesn't need it). He can be many things, and is someone you like or you hate. But is someone who normally follow the rules.
I don't think he is doing it on abusive way, but so I think it is not needed too. Specially in such "questions" as the one opening this thread. Publishing the contribution already gives people the possibility to land on it through google search.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Sergey is not promoting another site, nor reputation hunting (he doesn't need it).
I agree. I'm not trying to report on sergey just would like to know and you know , I'm a big fan of sergey. 
Born To Learn
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, you can always say you have a really big hammer!
Geek code v 3.12
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
I use 1TBS
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gone 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Born To Learn
|
|
|
|
|
The user answers a 3 weeks-old post in Hardware & Devices, in an ugly textspeak style and with a web address at the bottom; his only post.
Spam[^] mer[^]
[edit]Spam deleted - OriginalGriff[/edit]
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
modified 22-Mar-15 5:25am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plagiarism is not blattant; I could not retrieve a part that is a verbatim copy of something else.
But this does not bring anything new to the subject, either. This is just an attempt to explain what can be found in many places; examples could have been copied, and the classes names changed, but there is no proof of that, and I don't think there can be.
This leaves me with the same feelings as every other short article on design patterns: OK, we get the concept, but what is lacking is a concrete description, from the beginning, of the issues it solves.
If formatting issues were to be corrected, then it would at least deserve an "incomplete" report.
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
|
|
|
|
|
No, it's not - but it does look likely to me, especially given his other, more blatant attempt and his comment when it was pointed out to him.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
To me either I just can't prove it, the only thing remaining is that it's only another way to express what have been written several times, and not the best one. At most, it's old hat.
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
|
|
|
|
|
Born To Learn
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spam[^] mer[^]
Second spam[^] from the same.
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
modified 21-Mar-15 9:11am.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
