|
|
I see no spam payload, and nothing that looks like a setup for spam.
All I can see is an attempt to answer the question, saying basically the same thing you said (except less eloquently), and replying to the wrong person.
Hardly a capital offence for a new user who probably doesn't count English as their first language.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, that's why I said "looks like ...".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.
"I'm neither for nor against, on the contrary." John Middle
|
|
|
|
|
|
.
"I'm neither for nor against, on the contrary." John Middle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Member 13524508 - Professional Profile[^]
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning
modified 29-Nov-17 16:46pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Just a thought, but if you add the member name to moderation spammer reports, we can see more easily if they are already reported when they re-appear in the queue!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Sure.
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|